Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-05-2016, 05:15 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
15,153 posts, read 11,678,624 times
Reputation: 8631

Advertisements

Have you noticed not 1 single Celeb Hillary supporter never talks about her "accomplishments"? Nope, any time they go on this vapid talk shows, all they do is attack Trump. They never say WHY they support the corrupt witch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-05-2016, 05:17 PM
 
Location: Missouri
1,875 posts, read 1,336,410 times
Reputation: 3118
the Official Welcome Back to the White House Hillary, Bill, Chelsea & Socks

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 05:18 PM
 
21,991 posts, read 15,802,756 times
Reputation: 12954
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee View Post
Oh good grief! If Lizzy Borden were running instead of Hillary the left would still chide people, such as you have done in your post, about people not voting for her simply because she's a woman.
I would love for a female to finally become the president, but not Hillary. She would be so utterly horrible that it would probably take another 227 years before anyone would take another female candidate seriously. All of the qualified women in this country and the lefties picked the most corrupt one out of the group.
Hillary Clinton is not Lizzie Borden and Donald Trump is no saint, not even close. And this whole "I would love to vote for a woman" is just total BS that men and women will say for the next five centuries because women are weak and seek male approval while men have enjoyed controlling this country since its birth and have no desire to change that.

There are more women in this country than men. Why would you say it will take another 227 before another woman would be taken seriously as if women are so weak and pitiful that they need to beg, hope and plead to be given another chance? How pitiful can women be? It's no wonder it took someone like Hillary Clinton to make it this far, the woman is made of steel. She is more qualified than Trump could dream of being and Trump has a track record of corruption that goes back to the 60s and 70s when his father wouldn't rent to blacks. But the attacks we see against Hillary are things like nasty and ill-tempered?

Women in this country really are an embarrassment. If this generation lived in the late 1800s, women wouldn't even be able to vote now. They would be bragging to their husbands and friends how they didn't even want to vote and won't be played by the "gender card".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 05:19 PM
 
Location: DFW
41,011 posts, read 49,508,269 times
Reputation: 55170
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
Stupid.
Most Trump supporters aren't against her because she's a woman.
They are against here because she's:


* Nasty
* Ill Tempered
* A race baiter
* Incompetent
* Completely dishonest
* Corrupt


Shall I continue?
Most women I know think she's disgusting also so It's certainly not a male thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 05:23 PM
 
21,991 posts, read 15,802,756 times
Reputation: 12954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
Most women I know think she's disgusting also so It's certainly not a male thing.
Yes, those women deserve to be treated as the lesser citizens they have been. Trump has a long history of treating women horribly but these sad, pitiful women will tell everyone how smart they are for choosing another male president because the woman is just so disgusting. 227 years of male presidents, not one female and yet there are more women than men in this country. Women, you will be treated less because you ask to be treated that way. Men would never ever put up with it and that's why they've been in power for the entire history of this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 05:27 PM
 
9,398 posts, read 6,519,575 times
Reputation: 12605
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELOrocks17 View Post
Have you noticed not 1 single Celeb Hillary supporter never talks about her "accomplishments"? Nope, any time they go on this vapid talk shows, all they do is attack Trump. They never say WHY they support the corrupt witch.
Those celebs have been told to support Hillary but they have never been told why they should support Hillary. They are just following the demands of their handlers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 05:28 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,595,595 times
Reputation: 12319
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtkinsonDan View Post
Those celebs have been told to support Hillary but they have never been told why they should support Hillary. They are just following the demands of their handlers.
Yup and they know they will probably be blacklisted if they don't support.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 05:33 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
15,153 posts, read 11,678,624 times
Reputation: 8631
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm1982 View Post
Yup and they know they will probably be blacklisted if they don't support.
You would think ANY politician who takes money from countries that murder gay people would be completely and utterly shunned by the Hollywood elite..guess not huh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 05:36 PM
 
21,991 posts, read 15,802,756 times
Reputation: 12954
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELOrocks17 View Post
You would think ANY politician who takes money from countries that murder gay people would be completely and utterly shunned by the Hollywood elite..guess not huh?
The Republican Party platform is anti-gay.

Log Cabin Republicans: GOP Platform the 'Most Anti-LGBT' in Party's History


Log Cabin Republicans: GOP Platform the 'Most Anti-LGBT' in Party's History - ABC News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 05:48 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
15,153 posts, read 11,678,624 times
Reputation: 8631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
The Republican Party platform is anti-gay.

Log Cabin Republicans: GOP Platform the 'Most Anti-LGBT' in Party's History


Log Cabin Republicans: GOP Platform the 'Most Anti-LGBT' in Party's History - ABC News
Well, Trump is not a log cabin Republican, so there is no issue there. They should support him 100%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top