Stanford U: Hillary Clinton CANNOT win without fraud (democratic, myths, billion)

[DonJuanQuixote]

Odds Hillary Won Without Widespread Fraud: 1 in 77 Billion Says Berkeley, Stanford Studies | HNN – Higgins News Network

Link contains article, video, and research findings.

[beb0p]

This has been debunked.

And they were talking about the Democratic Primary, not the general election!

.

[phma]

Originally Posted by beb0p

This has been debunked.

And they were talking about the Democratic Primary, not the general election!

.

Do you have a link ? for your missing link.

[beb0p]

Originally Posted by phma

Do you have a link ? for your missing link.

Step 1: Look at the article that the OP linked to.

Step 2: Notice the date of the article is June 18, 2016.

Step 3: Put two and two together.

http://www.snopes.com/stanford-study...discrepancies/

WHAT'S FALSE: The paper was not a "Stanford Study," and its authors acknowledged their claims and research methodology had not been subject to any form of peer review or academic scrutiny.

and this:

Election Fraud Myths: "Are we witnessing" a feckless analysis?

.