Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't understand that. I used to live in Boston, and had to go through her initial election. It was painful to say the least. Are the Dems just tone deaf? I saw a similar discussion on CNN over the weekend. One of the comentators mentioned that Dems needed to focus less on identify politics, and on issues that were more important to those Dems who switched to Trump - the economy, immigration, etc. The libs still pushed back and focused on climate change, identify politics. How hard is it to understand, that 70-80% of the population is either center right or center left.
Seems like the libs are hell bent on pushing the extreme left agenda.
I agree +repped
So the Dems are doubling down? After losing both houses and getting in Trump....they want to risk losing more with the old guard? They need fresh blood and listen to America (as in the whole country) really wants.
I don't understand that. I used to live in Boston, and had to go through her initial election. It was painful to say the least. Are the Dems just tone deaf?
Wasn't she the one unwilling to shake peoples hands while campaigning, because they were commoners I guess?
If Dems pick Keith Ellison to run the DNC over Howard Dean it proves they learned nothing. They can not admit their "New Majority" strategy is a disaster. Compare this to the genius strategy of the GOP after Obama won in 2008. They poured money into state legislative races and governors. They swept into power in 2010 and gerrymandered the living heck out of many states.
The new majority got Barack Obama elected twice, so it seems to me that the problem isnt the strategy, but rather who leads it.
As for the DNC chairmanship, you are right, it should be Howard Dean.
How hard is it to understand, that 70-80% of the population is either center right or center left.
Seems like the libs are hell bent on pushing the extreme left agenda.
Extreme left?
Sorry but the Democrats generally speaking, are to the right of the Tory (Conservative) party in the UK.
I think Elizabeth Warren could win a presidential election; she has a better reputation than Hillary in some respects. I don't care for her, but Trump might alienate a lot of independent and/or white voters in his first four years, and usher in a Democrat resurgence; and Warren could ride that wave to the top...
I think Elizabeth Warren could win a presidential election; she has a better reputation than Hillary in some respects. I don't care for her, but Trump might alienate a lot of independent and/or white voters in his first four years, and usher in a Democrat resurgence; and Warren could ride that wave to the top...
I agree Warren has a better reputation than Hillary. The problem is she will really struggle on a national platform. Its just my opinion
Please do, Elizabeth Warren would be a wonderful choice
for libs.
Her and trump are such good friends.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
