Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She won in terms of content. Her answers were more specific, detailed, and informed. She was far more articulate, and most media folk, for reasons I'm sure you can understand, prize that. After all, it's how they make a living themselves (or at least, how they are supposed to.)
She has almost no content & no details. She blabs & blabs. Hillary is more polished & articulate...that I will give her credit.
I have to agree that Mr. TappperJohn's observation is closest to the mark, but I'm also reminded of the comment about Eugene Hickok and Perry Smith, the two killers in Truman Capote's In Cold Blood, that individually, neither one could commit the crime, but together, they were capable of it.
The naivete' of the SJW juveniles, the "don't give a &^%$ " attitude of the permanent welfare crowd, and the hard-to-hide contempt shown by Obama and the Clintons all played a part.
Barry-O's WonderPets to the contrary, it would appear that teamwork backfired in this case.
Who switched their votes because of the deplorable comment? Nope not buying it.
The simplest explanation is usually the right one, in this case she was the wrong candidate, our system needed an injection of populism, she was the antithesis of that.
She won in terms of content. Her answers were more specific, detailed, and informed. She was far more articulate, and most media folk, for reasons I'm sure you can understand, prize that. After all, it's how they make a living themselves (or at least, how they are supposed to.)
She lost in terms of touching the raw emotions of her base and the undecided. Remember hearing the phrase "enthusiasm gap?"
Does that sound about right to you?
I think we are in agreement. I did say she sounded more presidential. However, she failed to target specific people like Trump did. It became clear to me how people could vote for him and how her campaign could be in trouble. So when the media was in agreement that she won the debate, I did not agree because I considered who Trump may be targeting.
Who switched their votes because of the deplorable comment? Nope not buying it.
The simplest explanation is usually the right one, in this case she was the wrong candidate, our system needed an injection of populism, she was the antithesis of that.
I don't think it was so much anyone switching their vote but maybe having people vote, in some cases, who might not.
Just when you think the blame game can't get any more crazy!
And what a way to win friends/influence voters in future elections.
Oh for the love of Pete. How about thinking women don't want her to be the first woman president? Maybe someone that doesn't cheat, lie, and manipulate their way to the top? I vote with my brain, not my vagina.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Attention white woman voters....sounds like it's your fault now that hil lost by your "internalized misogyny"
