Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The premise of Understanding is best, when it is utilized
Quote:
Originally Posted by FKD19124
Get over it. you lost!
I'm almost of sorrow for you, that such an affliction of limits within comprehension capability, has driven you to miss the tonality of the subject material.
Maybe it might help, to re-read what is written with a mindset to see and grasp perspective, and pursue efforts to understanding better, the tonality of expressions. Beyond this compassionate urging, there's not much else I can help you with.
The race-card is dead in the Trump administration....he's not playing.
Have you seen his picks? Bannon and Sessions are vocal White supremacists. Sessions was rejected for a federal judgeship in 1986 because of his openly racist views. It's very, very, very rare that a federal judgeship nomination is rejected by the US Senate Judicial Committee. It's only happened twice in the last 50 years.
Have you seen his picks? Bannon and Sessions are vocal White supremacists. Sessions was rejected for a federal judgeship in 1986 because of his openly racist views. It's very, very, very rare that a federal judgeship nomination is rejected by the US Senate Judicial Committee. It's only happened twice in the last 50 years.
Good Point !!!! but, as we see and continue to see, "Blind Allegiance" won't allow them to see such truths.....
It's really unfortunate, such blindness simply amplifies the racism, when the ignorance of some of these racist is embolden to think they have an upper hand, they become of much arrogance until they blind themselves, to the aggressive nature of their own racism.
It is not likely they will understand what you've tried to impart, they'd likely come back with some abstract condescending utterance.
Have you seen his picks? Bannon and Sessions are vocal White supremacists. Sessions was rejected for a federal judgeship in 1986 because of his openly racist views. It's very, very, very rare that a federal judgeship nomination is rejected by the US Senate Judicial Committee. It's only happened twice in the last 50 years.
I guess you spout this nonsense because most dems are completely uninformed, and may believe it.
There is a thread on here asking anyone to provide evidence that Bannon is a bigot, 18 pages so far, and not a single piece of evidence has been presented.
As far as Sessions, there was allegations, but no proof of any racist remarks.
I'm sure ppl on the progressive fascist regressive left, want to dictate that happen. Those 2 are the limp wristed snowflakes, worst nightmare. If it upsets the left so much, Trump is on the right track to draining the corrupt swamp.
You're calling Democrats "fascist" and "regressive" in regard to their dismay at Trump's advocacy of Bannon and Guiliani??
I suggest you learn the meaning of "fascist" and "regressive". T'aint us Democrats who fit those descriptions just now.
But what pressure? Who cares what the OP thinks? And I seriously doubt Trump and his team pay any attention to the hysterics and their hissy fits at the NYT and WaPo, who would love to sabotage Trump right from the start.
OH, the NYT gored Trump's ox, all right - see his own little hissy fit on Twitter, name-calling yet again. Contrary to such wishful invective, the NYT is not a "failing newspaper", as their subscriptions have risen astronomically in the last few weeks.
Some of these people talk as if they are hiding behind a "sheet"; It's so much like those whom put the pointed sheet hats on their head, trying to hide their identity while they engage in the vile of their twisted minds. To think that these type of people would ever admit to what is overtly true of their bias, bigotry and their ignorance. is simply wishful thinking.
They don't have the type nor quality of character to be of honesty in such perspective and regards.
Therefore, expect to see a rash of more of "one liner, slap stick idiocy" to be uttered.
Contrary to such wishful invective, the NYT is not a "failing newspaper", as their subscriptions have risen astronomically in the last few weeks.
Digital subscriptions are up...but that's what happens when you essentially give away subscriptions for free. In the meantime the NYT is struggling to survive with a combination of buyouts and layoffs.
I'm almost of sorrow for you, that such an affliction of limits within comprehension capability, has driven you to miss the tonality of the subject material.
Maybe it might help, to re-read what is written with a mindset to see and grasp perspective, and pursue efforts to understanding better, the tonality of expressions. Beyond this compassionate urging, there's not much else I can help you with.
I didn't see anyone ask for your help. Why would they?
Furthermore, you didn't address what he said.
Your side did lose. It lost bigly.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The premise of Understanding is best, when it is utilized
