Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Joe Biden wouldn't have been the first woman President of the United States. I don't believe he would have gotten as much attention. In fact the election could have been far worse had he run.
Now after Hillary Clinton's stunning landslide loss, would the Democrats have been better off if they had nominated Joe Biden, the sitting VP to run as their nominee instead.
He had 8 years in the WH as VP, and he certainly didn't have the endless scandals which followed the Clintons like stink at a pig farm.
Hillary won, Russia hacked the ballot boxes for a Trump win. Poor whites don't VOTE!
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,968 posts, read 25,588,970 times
Reputation: 12193
Bernie was the best candidate for the Democrats. He would have gotten some votes Trump got, more importantly Millennials would have turned out in droves. There was no Trump surge, he got less votes than McCain or Romney. Hillary got millions less votes than Obama.
Biden would have done no better than Hillary. He doesn't solve Millennial and minority turnout problems.
Now after Hillary Clinton's stunning landslide loss, would the Democrats have been better off if they had nominated Joe Biden, the sitting VP to run as their nominee instead.
No. Replacing Hillary with Biden would still result in a landslide for Trump. Biden and Hillary are cut from the same cloth.....They both are arrogant liars; both think they're too good to fail; both think the world revolves around them; both are embarrassments to their party.
Now after Hillary Clinton's stunning landslide loss, would the Democrats have been better off if they had nominated Joe Biden, the sitting VP to run as their nominee instead.
I am a Trump fan, delighted he won, but at the very least, JB would have won either Michigan or Wisconsin, but the only way they would have nominated him in 2016 is if he changed genders.
They wanted a first, as opposed to wanting the best candidate.
Now after Hillary Clinton's stunning landslide loss, would the Democrats have been better off if they had nominated Joe Biden, the sitting VP to run as their nominee instead.
He had 8 years in the WH as VP, and he certainly didn't have the endless scandals which followed the Clintons like stink at a pig farm.
The decision was his to make not the parties and he chose not to run, woulda, coulda, should have...
The decision was his to make not the parties and he chose not to run, woulda, coulda, should have...
The fix was in for HRC at the DNC.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
