Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-15-2016, 12:30 AM
 
670 posts, read 1,108,383 times
Reputation: 893

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
These ignorant ****s STILL haven't realized that this is exactly why Trump won in the first place.

^ This!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-15-2016, 01:06 AM
 
7,978 posts, read 7,379,722 times
Reputation: 12078
Quote:
Originally Posted by brownbagg View Post
Mike Farrell, Loretta Swit was on MASH
martin Sheen is charlie sheen dad

Where's Alan Alda? Klinger? Radar?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 01:48 AM
 
Location: So Cal
10,041 posts, read 9,549,899 times
Reputation: 10473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. Skeffington View Post
Where's Alan Alda? Klinger? Radar?
Not sure about Alan and radar but I heard klinger was too busy shopping for a dress for New Year's Eve.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 01:51 AM
 
Location: So Cal
10,041 posts, read 9,549,899 times
Reputation: 10473
Quote:
Originally Posted by xboxmas View Post
Haven't heard of most of them.
I've heard and recognize most of them. Don't know talia balsam by sight but I remember she used to be married to George Clooney, so it does not surprise me she would be in the video.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 03:24 AM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,688 posts, read 6,764,591 times
Reputation: 6598
If the American people gave a crap what Hollywood actors thought politically, then Hillary Clinton would have won the election by a landslide. Clearly, they don't care what these people think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 05:34 AM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,718 posts, read 16,922,134 times
Reputation: 41865
Here is the point of all of this: When, in ANY election have you seen such an uproar about ANY other person who won ? We might not have liked it, and we grumbled, but we accepted it and went on. THIS election is totally different and a huge number of people are not accepting it in any way, shape , or form.

What can be the reason? It is simply because the man who was elected is much more than uniquely unqualified to hold this position, he is also dangerous is so many ways. He is going to attempt to rip apart many of the laws and policies that affect the average person.......ie, Roe v Wade, Medicare, Social Security, workers rights, workers conditions, etc. He , and his cabinet, have no regard for the environment.........they do not care what kind of Earth your kids and grandkids inherit.

He is also already showing how he has zero knowledge of how the world works. He is not even in there yet, and has upset some other countries, and is Hellbent of destroying decade old pacts and agreements that benefited us as much as our allies.

Those are only a few of the reasons this madman, with an agenda to make himself and his cronies richer, while using the common people who voted for him to do it, must be kept out of that office at all costs. His followers, for the most part, still have not seen the light, but they will, but by then it might be too late to repair his damage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 05:40 AM
 
17,409 posts, read 11,393,993 times
Reputation: 41245
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945 View Post
Here is the point of all of this: When, in ANY election have you seen such an uproar about ANY other person who won ? We might not have liked it, and we grumbled, but we accepted it and went on. THIS election is totally different and a huge number of people are not accepting it in any way, shape , or form.

What can be the reason? It is simply because the man who was elected is much more than uniquely unqualified to hold this position, he is also dangerous is so many ways. He is going to attempt to rip apart many of the laws and policies that affect the average person.......ie, Roe v Wade, Medicare, Social Security, workers rights, workers conditions, etc. He , and his cabinet, have no regard for the environment.........they do not care what kind of Earth your kids and grandkids inherit.

He is also already showing how he has zero knowledge of how the world works. He is not even in there yet, and has upset some other countries, and is Hellbent of destroying decade old pacts and agreements that benefited us as much as our allies.

Those are only a few of the reasons this madman, with an agenda to make himself and his cronies richer, while using the common people who voted for him to do it, must be kept out of that office at all costs. His followers, for the most part, still have not seen the light, but they will, but by then it might be too late to repair his damage.
I remember a lot of uproar when Reagan won. Same old crap. Barbara Streisand was going to move out of the country. I don't think she ever did. Maybe she bought a new vacation home on the French Riviera to hang out with her other elitist friends. My philosophy is that if Hollywood is foaming at the mouth hating a politician or candidate, then that candidate must be a great choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 05:47 AM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,718 posts, read 16,922,134 times
Reputation: 41865
Quote:
Originally Posted by marino760 View Post
I remember a lot of uproar when Reagan won. Same old crap. Barbara Streisand was going to move out of the country. I don't think she ever did. Maybe she bought a new vacation home on the French Riviera to hang out with her other elitist friends. My philosophy is that if Hollywood is foaming at the mouth hating a politician or candidate, then that candidate must be a great choice.
No, this one is very different. When people are using terms like madman, idiot, clown, buffoon, Hitler, etc, it is indicative of how badly this man is perceived by a lot of people.

You have to remember, the vast majority of people in this country saw through his con act, Hillary did win the popular vote, it was only through the shuffling of votes in the EC that he pulled it off. Now, even those people in the EC are not feeling good about having to put their name on his Presidency.

No, this one is much different than any before and much scarier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 05:55 AM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,718 posts, read 16,922,134 times
Reputation: 41865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiga Beau Perkins View Post
Who still see evil for what it is

Amen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 05:58 AM
 
17,409 posts, read 11,393,993 times
Reputation: 41245
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945 View Post
No, this one is very different. When people are using terms like madman, idiot, clown, buffoon, Hitler, etc, it is indicative of how badly this man is perceived by a lot of people.

You have to remember, the vast majority of people in this country saw through his con act, Hillary did win the popular vote, it was only through the shuffling of votes in the EC that he pulled it off. Now, even those people in the EC are not feeling good about having to put their name on his Presidency.

No, this one is much different than any before and much scarier.
Wrong, wrong, wrong. Without CA Hillary didn't win squat, not even the popular vote. So winning one State with a massive left wing population should out weigh the rest of the country? I don't think so.
Also, Reagan was called every name in the book by liberals including everything you mentioned above. Nothing new here. What shuffling of votes? States don't shuffle EC votes. I'm certain if Hillary had won, there'd also be a hand full of EC voters that would flat out refuse to vote for a criminal. You never got the chance to see that since Hillary the criminal lost.
Maybe once CA starts complying with Federals laws instead of being a far left rogue state and illegal sanctuary, then maybe we can take anything they vote on seriously. Until then, they shouldn't even be included in national elections since they don't comply with federal laws and pretend they are virtually a nation all to themselves. It should be that simple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top