Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-18-2016, 07:11 AM
 
6,675 posts, read 4,289,393 times
Reputation: 8441

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by metalmancpa View Post
On one side you have the winning side poo poo'ing all of the reports about potential, and I stress potential, election issues from Russian hacks and Putin's knowledge to the crosscheck where voters kicked off the polls (Michigan for example) etc.

On the other side you have the losing side whining about blatant misjustice to fraud to fixed, rigged etc.

In my mind, all I can say is there is enough noise for me to at least question the results. But until there is hard concrete evidence as opposed to accusations and reports of look likes and maybes, then we should continue to move forward. The only thing I laugh about is Trump was the one whining and screaming about voter fraud long before he got elected, and now once in of course not a peep.
There was no way I was voting for Hillary in any scenario, so full disclosure. Trump wasn't my dream candidate by any stretch of the imagination, but I voted for him. In California a lot of good that did, but....

I'd have a problem if the allegations were that the hack was to plant false information or hack the voting machines. That wasn't the case. The hacked email (as has been pointed out 3,487 times in these forums) revealed the DNC and Hillary to be the biggest bunch of crooks, liars and cheats around. If the Russians were behind the hacks, I don't care. The truth remains. Hillary shafted Bernie, wasn't smart or confident enough to engage in a debate with a man who gets into twitter wars with a comedy show without cheating and is just fine with rioters destroying property without so much as a word.

Most of the people I've talked to, the posts I've read and the media stories I've read ignore the emails. If you read the stories and posts without knowing the full story you would think the voting system got hacked and votes were changed from Hillary to Trump. They do not acknowledge the duplicity and underhanded dealing that went on. The refusal to accept the truth goes hand in hand with the shaking, crying, baby-like behavior of the millennials.

The truth about Trump's victory is that as bad as he is, Hillary is much, much worse. Her support base doesn't fall far from the tree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-18-2016, 07:19 AM
PDD
 
Location: The Sand Hills of NC
8,773 posts, read 18,411,561 times
Reputation: 12005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve930 View Post
There was no way I was voting for Hillary in any scenario, so full disclosure. Trump wasn't my dream candidate by any stretch of the imagination, but I voted for him. In California a lot of good that did, but....

I'd have a problem if the allegations were that the hack was to plant false information or hack the voting machines. That wasn't the case. The hacked email (as has been pointed out 3,487 times in these forums) revealed the DNC and Hillary to be the biggest bunch of crooks, liars and cheats around. If the Russians were behind the hacks, I don't care. The truth remains. Hillary shafted Bernie, wasn't smart or confident enough to engage in a debate with a man who gets into twitter wars with a comedy show without cheating and is just fine with rioters destroying property without so much as a word.

Most of the people I've talked to, the posts I've read and the media stories I've read ignore the emails. If you read the stories and posts without knowing the full story you would think the voting system got hacked and votes were changed from Hillary to Trump. They do not acknowledge the duplicity and underhanded dealing that went on. The refusal to accept the truth goes hand in hand with the shaking, crying, baby-like behavior of the millennials.

The truth about Trump's victory is that as bad as he is, Hillary is much, much worse. Her support base doesn't fall far from the tree.
Voting for President was like calling for a Taxi,

Do you want a driver with a glove box full of tickets or do you want a driver who never drove a car before.

America has chosen the inexperienced to take us for a ride.

I hope we survive the driving lesson.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2016, 07:43 AM
 
6,675 posts, read 4,289,393 times
Reputation: 8441
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDD View Post
Voting for President was like calling for a Taxi,

Do you want a driver with a glove box full of tickets or do you want a driver who never drove a car before.

America has chosen the inexperienced to take us for a ride.

I hope we survive the driving lesson.
Well said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2016, 07:44 AM
 
Location: Swiftwater, PA
18,773 posts, read 18,187,060 times
Reputation: 14783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve930 View Post
Most of the people I've talked to, the posts I've read and the media stories I've read ignore the emails. If you read the stories and posts without knowing the full story you would think the voting system got hacked and votes were changed from Hillary to Trump. They do not acknowledge the duplicity and underhanded dealing that went on. The refusal to accept the truth goes hand in hand with the shaking, crying, baby-like behavior of the millennials.
Great post!

In only one case that I remember; did Podesta challenge whether WikiLeaks information was factual. But, even in that one case; he did not come forward to tell us what was the truth. Obama and Hillary were ready to get us into WWIII simply because the Russians told the truth or, at least, a part of it! Obama's first reaction was to place a No Fly Zone over Syria which could have easily escalated into all out war. Fortunately he backed down. The Russians took him seriously and they were on the verge of war because of it. Both Russia and many in the US breathed a sigh of relief when Trump won.

When it comes to nuclear war, considering how quick you have to respond; it does neither side any good to live in fear or the other side - we want respect and not fear.

I also love that the liberal side loves whales, trees, pets and all things green. But they are willing to turn the Northern Hemisphere into an uninhabitable atomic wasteland because they do not want us to hear the truth! Even today Obama is planning an appraisal against Russia for telling us the truth!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2016, 08:13 AM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,483 posts, read 15,287,866 times
Reputation: 14351
Quote:
Originally Posted by metalmancpa View Post
Yes it has. Read my OP.

The garbage is that "you all" believe 100%, without a shred of anything, that all was clean as a whistle. Basically the entire other side is 100% throwing conspiracy theories in the air. 100%. Not even 99.99% Ivory Pure. That's the garbage. Too afraid to even think for a second, hmmm, who knows? That's ALL I said in my OP.

"In my mind, all I can say is there is enough noise for me to at least question the results. But until there is hard concrete evidence as opposed to accusations and reports of look likes and maybes, then we should continue to move forward. The only thing I laugh about is Trump was the one whining and screaming about voter fraud long before he got elected, and now once in of course not a peep."

As the title of the thread states, we may never know the whole truth. "You all" on the other hand just are 100% positive sure. That's garbage, and you are sheep. At least I have some objectivity in me, to at least keep my eyes open, questioning both sides, regardless of whom I voted for. That's irrelevant to the topic. Garbage.
So, by your standards, how can we be 100% sure of anything? People say things without any proof all the time. That shouldn't create doubt in a rational person.

How do we know the 2012 election wasn't hacked by Canada?
How do we know that Hillary isn't into snuff films?

People can say anything they want about anything or anyone. When there is zero evidence to back it up, why would a rational person believe it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2016, 08:43 AM
 
11,185 posts, read 6,520,163 times
Reputation: 4627
Quote:
Originally Posted by metalmancpa View Post
Yes it has. Read my OP.

The garbage is that "you all" believe 100%, without a shred of anything, that all was clean as a whistle. Basically the entire other side is 100% throwing conspiracy theories in the air. 100%. Not even 99.99% Ivory Pure. That's the garbage. Too afraid to even think for a second, hmmm, who knows? That's ALL I said in my OP.

"In my mind, all I can say is there is enough noise for me to at least question the results. But until there is hard concrete evidence as opposed to accusations and reports of look likes and maybes, then we should continue to move forward. The only thing I laugh about is Trump was the one whining and screaming about voter fraud long before he got elected, and now once in of course not a peep."

As the title of the thread states, we may never know the whole truth. "You all" on the other hand just are 100% positive sure. That's garbage, and you are sheep. At least I have some objectivity in me, to at least keep my eyes open, questioning both sides, regardless of whom I voted for. That's irrelevant to the topic. Garbage.
Congrats on your self-proclaimed objectivity. We'll continue to move forward whether or not you or anyone else question the results. Regardless of how WikiLeaks got the emails, the publication of private emails may, or may not have, affected the results. Who knows, if nobody had recorded Romney's '47%' comment maybe he'd have beaten Obama; maybe if Trump's audio had not been made public, he'd have won by a bigger margin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2016, 09:01 AM
 
Location: annandale, va & slidell, la
9,267 posts, read 5,132,033 times
Reputation: 8471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
In 2012, pre-election polling, exit polling, the electoral margin and the popular margin all pointed to an Obama victory. In 2016, only one of them pointed to a Trump victory and it was by the slimmest of margins imaginable. With certain Russian meddling, Trump's narrow electoral college win will always be suspect and his legitimacy as president will be questioned.
Speak for yourself. It's only suspect because you lost. You and your media pals were tricked and it pisses you off.
The polsters that were reliable in the past were making false assumptions based on polling from mostly democrats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2016, 09:04 AM
 
Location: San Francisco born/raised - Las Vegas
2,819 posts, read 2,118,568 times
Reputation: 1905
One thing is true and certain.

The Climate is Changing. There is a new political storm on the horizon. I welcome the Warmer weather, as it approaches.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2016, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
12,957 posts, read 13,376,956 times
Reputation: 14020
Quote:
Originally Posted by sapphire1 View Post
Neither one of the candidates were any good. It was a disgrace to this country.
You are correct.

The two parties have lowered the bar so low, it disgusts me to think about it. What is sad, there are plenty of good, capable people on both "sides" who could be running, but are put off (or out) by corrupt party practices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2016, 10:06 AM
 
2,646 posts, read 1,850,528 times
Reputation: 3107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Javacoffee View Post
This is exactly what it is.

They never stop.
If by "they," you mean Hillary supporters? "We," may never "stop." Believing, that Hillary is the true winner with over 2.8 million votes. Some day the electoral college will change. It has never been more evident, than now, change is necessary, for our democracy.

No matter what anyone thinks, or believe they know, Hillary was by far the most qualified candidate. A man with the same credentials would be the president elect; not some rich, spoiled kid that tweets like a kid that should be in school. Scary, very scary.

Maybe, while we are at it; the president and commander in chief positions should be two different jobs. I think Trump may be an average president and America, may able to overcome his one sided, closed minded views. However; as commander in chief, he falls flat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top