Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Relying on government as the source of property rights seldom ends well for the landless.
We don't. Private sellers and private buyers set the market. Not the government.
Minimum standards are set up to insure places that look like slums cannot be added which would harm the market value of homeowners with pride , who maintain their property properly.
1) Dispute the electoral college
2) Call it rigged
3) Have a sit-in on inauguration day
4) Lose at the inauguration day
5) Start the new "MeanPeace" Movement
6) Put "boots on the ground" in Mexico with booths, tables and literature espousing the free stuff they can have if they promise to vote Democrat next time once they cross illegally
7) Start a riot when same folks who come across actually have a job and have to now pay taxes and things are no longer free
8) Go on the talk show circuit scratching their heads why the recent "immigrants", er, "undocumented/illegal workers" are now voting Republican
9) Blame George Bush for everything that isn't going their way
10) Demand a recall long after the Dogwoods are in bloom
11) Start putting bumper stickers asking for Hillary on the backs of their gas guzzling SUV's
12) Demand more credit to offset the houses on interest only they can no longer afford
13) Turn SUV in for a smaller one when gas hits $3 a gallon thanks to interest rates
14) Blame George Bush
15) Wonder what to do with the tax break they are about to receive
16) Blame George Bush for the tax cut
17) Buy more Democrat literature from the now defunct Church of Scientology who is in search of new revenues now that Reminy or whatever her name is now squaking
18) Borrow more, spend more, and then demand Congress forgive it
19) Wishing they really, really, had voted for Bernie Sanders
20) Show up to Hillary's Book signing, "If only you believed", shell out $25 for the paperback
21) Assault the clerk at the local book store when Hillary sells the last 5 copies for $5
22) Increase their Zoloft allotment
23) Beat their kids, kick the dog outside of the PTA and Subdivision Meetings
24) Ask Ariana Huffington, "why?"
25) Demand Nancy Pelosi "get in there and do something!"
26) And finally, blame George Bush for everything that goes wrong in their lives....
Something like that.....
That was impressive! You forgot they will call everyone racist,bigot,nazi,anti semite,xenophobe,islamaphobic,etc etc.
We don't. Private sellers and private buyers set the market. Not the government.
Minimum standards are set up to insure places that look like slums cannot be added which would harm the market value of homeowners with pride , who maintain their property properly.
No objective determination of such harm is required or even offered - it's a political determination, imposed on the landless by the Property Class. See your local zoning code.
However, harm to the landless is never prohibited and is often encouraged for the benefit of the Property Class.
No objective determination of such harm is required or even offered - it's a political determination, imposed on the landless by the Property Class. See your local zoning code.
However, harm to the landless is never prohibited and is often encouraged for the benefit of the Property Class.
Can't harm someone who doesn't own property via property restrictions. They have no investment to be harmed.
Can't harm someone who doesn't own property via property restrictions. They have no investment to be harmed.
??? ??? Property restrictions --> government artificially restricts supply of housing types considered undesirable (e.g. apartments, trailers, rooming houses) --> restricted supply--> prices and rents increase naturally due to supply and demand --> people who don't own property are harmed.
The landless NECESSARILY depend on the property rights of others if they are even able to RENT, let alone BUY, property. Relying on government as the source of property rights seldom ends well for the landless.
Your reasoning is similar to that of an open borders supporter who tells us that illegal immigration does not undercut wages for legal workers.
By your logic, property restrictions that drive up landlord costs do not harm renters. (e,g, a 100% property tax rate on rental property costs renters nothing) Do you seriously believe that?
??? ??? Property restrictions --> government artificially restricts supply of housing types considered undesirable (e.g. apartments, trailers, rooming houses) --> restricted supply--> prices and rents increase naturally due to supply and demand --> people who don't own property are harmed.
The landless NECESSARILY depend on the property rights of others if they are even able to RENT, let alone BUY, property. Relying on government as the source of property rights seldom ends well for the landless.
Your reasoning is similar to that of an open borders supporter who tells us that illegal immigration does not undercut wages for legal workers.
Property restrictions though vary greatly, town to town. You can simply choose to move to a town whose restrictions best accommodate you. There are fat food jobs all over, which helps your ability to be mobile in picking.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
