Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. In-Between
Ah... so we go from "drain the swamp, we're going to be the most ethical Administration in history" to "there's no reason we can't be just as corrupt as the other side."
Trumpheads are complete and total hypocrites. Thank you for confirming that once again.
I hate every one of you and everything you stand for. Get ready for 4 solid years of me in your face every damned day.
|
Bill Clinton, is that you?
As someone eventually says further through the posts, make it 8 years (hope you like Pence for another 8) and you'll see us just
Hate will eat your soul, look at Hillary Clinton and what it did to her.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1
Psssssssstttttttttttttttttt ~ your new first lady plagiarized from Michelle Obama and became a laughingstock on the world stage.
So far Trump has only a few qualifications he seems to be looking for: former employee of Faux; current billionaire status, how much did you personally help him get elected, and does he owe you a bit of pay to play like Pam Bondi and others.
|
Do you mean this Michelle Obama?
Look who Michelle Obama was CAUGHT plagiarizing DNC speech from... - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com Didn't CNN cover that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by McGowdog
Oh please, the pleasure is all ours... oh, and make that eight years.
|
Trump may only take 4 years if he gets the ball rolling and turn it over to Pence. Either way, it is going to be a long ride for sorry losers!
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDnurse
1. Trump isn't going to say anything truthful, honest or accurate; therefore, she's perfect for the job.
2. Trumps's supporters think that education is over rated and reading is unnecessary if the first sentence in a paragraph doesn't confirm what they already believe. So, they don't care about plagiarism.
Nothing new. Next
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by functionofx
If you copy from one source, it's plagiarism. If you copy from many, it's research.
Regardless, she isn't being picked to write a book, or PhD paper, as long as her copying made a good read, was cogent and pertinant to her arguments, she saved time. Trump may value this in an adviser and not consider it a problem.
Those whom she plagiarized from, should sue, if they have in any way been harmed. The issue would be between Crowley and the putative victims. My guess is those she copied from, also copied from someone else and wouldn't want to endure discovery.
|
I wonder when these people became all moral and caring about rules, regulations and laws, must have been after they voted for Hillary Clinton, the most morally, mentally and physically deplete individual walking (being dragged) through our country!
I didn't bother with another nonsense article, am truly concerned about anyone that expresses hatred toward any group of people, but could not see how that endangered national security or resulted in loss of life.
I guess "priorities" for Trump supporters are just different than those liberals could find it within their moral compass to support the "other" candidate.
I wonder who OP supported if OP is not a liberal though. With all the "hate" being spewn, I could not see it being a GOP candidate, especially religious type which most were if I remember correctly. Truly religious people do not hate.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
