Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-16-2017, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,607 posts, read 16,586,021 times
Reputation: 6055

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kamban View Post
Thank you for not doing that unlike all the other Hillary supporters who do it day in and day out, like this one. Once you start justifying one, it is a downward spiral and don't be surprised of BO is compared to a lower species. I don't like that too.



Another thing that galls me is the popular vote. It had no meaning and never will, unless the laws change. So bring it up time and again to justify Hillary's performance has no value. Trump had a overwhelming majority of the electoral vote and that is the game they played for and all that mattered. If she had also played the same game maybe she would have come close and maybe even won it. But winning big in NY, California or Texas does not make you a president. The in between states matter.

I don't want the democrats to die. If they become more main stream and get rid of wackos like Maxine Waters maybe they can be a force again. The first thing is to bury the past and get Hillary out of the way and to let the young fresh blood rise. The less we hear of Hillary whining and the more we hear from Gabbard and Webb, the more the people will see Democratic party as a true alternative nationwide.
The discussion is about who the people support. So yes, the popular vote does matter in that respect.


winning the electoral college does not mean you have the support of the people.

hypothetically, You could become president By winning California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio, New Jersey, Georgia, and North Carolina and lose every other thats and have 270 electoral votes.

Those states have a population of 186.102 million people. or 53% of the population. and account for 55% of everyone who voted. but lets say you won each state by a couple of votes

You could have a President with 270 EC votes, but only 25% of the popular vote. losing to someone who has 70% of the vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-16-2017, 08:03 PM
 
Location: Starting a walkabout
2,691 posts, read 1,670,947 times
Reputation: 3135
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
The discussion is about who the people support. So yes, the popular vote does matter in that respect.


winning the electoral college does not mean you have the support of the people.

hypothetically, You could become president By winning California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio, New Jersey, Georgia, and North Carolina and lose every other thats and have 270 electoral votes.

Those states have a population of 186.102 million people. or 53% of the population. and account for 55% of everyone who voted. but lets say you won each state by a couple of votes

You could have a President with 270 EC votes, but only 25% of the popular vote. losing to someone who has 70% of the vote.
I agree with what you have said but unfortunately rules are rules and one has to play by the rules. If they want to change that from electoral votes to popular let it be done legally and we can play by the new rules. Until then the notion of support of the people has no say or weight in the election of the president.

In my own case I have to taken an exam every few years to keep my license and job. There are 3 parts and I have to pass all the three sections in order to clear it. Even if I score 100% in the first and second and barely fail the third section I have failed the whole exam and have to take it again. Whereas a person who barely scraped though all three sections would have cleared the whole exam. He might have answered far fewer questions correctly than me but it does not matter. He passed and I failed. Those are the rules. Either I try to have it changed or I play by the existing rules.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2017, 09:14 PM
 
Location: 89434
6,658 posts, read 4,753,162 times
Reputation: 4838
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Quick! Which party won the popular vote for president?
The popular vote means nothing. Hillary had the popular vote because of California and New York.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2017, 09:21 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,378,870 times
Reputation: 7979
Quote:
Originally Posted by tripleh View Post
as long as Hank "islands can tip over" Johnson remains in the House in GA, that place is a joke. he is living proof that voter fraud exists.
He's living proof that democrat does not equal intelligent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2017, 11:02 PM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,607 posts, read 16,586,021 times
Reputation: 6055
Quote:
Originally Posted by kamban View Post
I agree with what you have said but unfortunately rules are rules and one has to play by the rules. If they want to change that from electoral votes to popular let it be done legally and we can play by the new rules. Until then the notion of support of the people has no say or weight in the election of the president.

In my own case I have to taken an exam every few years to keep my license and job. There are 3 parts and I have to pass all the three sections in order to clear it. Even if I score 100% in the first and second and barely fail the third section I have failed the whole exam and have to take it again. Whereas a person who barely scraped though all three sections would have cleared the whole exam. He might have answered far fewer questions correctly than me but it does not matter. He passed and I failed. Those are the rules. Either I try to have it changed or I play by the existing rules.
I will say it again, We arent debating the rules or who won, the discussion is based on who the people support.

The people to the tune of 65.8 million, supported Clinton over Donald Trump.

Regardless of who won, Hillary Clinton was supported by more people than Donald trump. More people wanted her as their president than him.


We are discussing who the people support, not who won the election, they are not one in the same and i think most people cant mentally get passed the block of "he won so that means the people support him"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2017, 01:35 AM
 
Location: Glendale NY
4,840 posts, read 9,923,457 times
Reputation: 3600
I agree that the popular votes matters. That's why Hillary is in the White House, because of the popular vote.

Oh wait, no she isn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2017, 02:18 AM
 
34,078 posts, read 17,134,198 times
Reputation: 17234
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoomDan515 View Post
I agree that the popular votes matters. That's why Hillary is in the White House, because of the popular vote.

Oh wait, no she isn't.
Perhaps DJT should invite her as a guest now and then. LOL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2017, 03:07 AM
 
12,045 posts, read 6,585,626 times
Reputation: 13985
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
I'm still working on the fringe definition.
I'm still working on the Bernie and porn part.....
Ugh, I never would have guessed, but it's true.....the guy did some creepy stuff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2017, 03:15 AM
 
12,045 posts, read 6,585,626 times
Reputation: 13985
Hillary only won the popular vote because of California.
California is a freak of nature -- plus they hate America and want to secede.
So their votes don't count in my book.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2017, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,198 posts, read 19,490,239 times
Reputation: 5308
On the GOP side, both Gingrich (who use to represent the district) and Rubio (who easily won the Primary in the district] have endorsed Hill who has been 3rd or 4th in most polls for the Republicans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top