Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Deanna asserts that she is qualified to be starting QB because she has spent the past 16 years married to Brett while he played QB for the Packers. During this period of time she became familiar with the definition of a corner blitz, and is now completely comfortable with other terminology of the Packers offense.
That's really a stupid comparison since one needs to have physical skill to play football.
Why don't you replace Clarence Thomas with his wife? I'll bet she could do his job without any problem. I'll bet Michelle Obama could take over for Barack Obama in the Senate without much stretch.
That's really a stupid comparison since one needs to have physical skill to play football.
Why don't you replace Clarence Thomas with his wife? I'll bet she could do his job without any problem. I'll bet Michelle Obama could take over for Barack Obama in the Senate without much stretch.
Wow don't take it so literally. Of course one needs physical skills to play football but the whole point of this "joke" comparison is that Deanna is basing her ability to play QB by the experiences of her husband, much like Hillary is basing her ability to be president by the experiences of her husband. So judging by your response, if this comparison did not involve any physical attributes but rather something more plausible then you're saying Hillary is capable of being president just because she was married to one? No matter what the comparisons are, it is straight up ridiculous to warrant someone a job who only base their "experiences" off another person.
Wow don't take it so literally. Of course one needs physical skills to play football but the whole point of this "joke" comparison is that Deanna is basing her ability to play QB by the experiences of her husband, much like Hillary is basing her ability to be president by the experiences of her husband. So judging by your response, if this comparison did not involve any physical attributes but rather something more plausible then you're saying Hillary is capable of being president just because she was married to one? No matter what the comparisons are, it is straight up ridiculous to warrant someone a job who only base their "experiences" off another person.
So you don't think Michelle Obama could take over for Barack in the Senate? Why not? I think she could...
So you don't think Michelle Obama could take over for Barack in the Senate? Why not? I think she could...
I never said she couldn't but even if she did, she wouldn't justify her place in the senate just because she is married to Barack--unlike Hillary who is basing her WHOLE candidacy on the experiences she gained as being the wife of a president . And you're only proving the point correct that Hillary IS basing her eligibility to become president off of her marriage to Bill, which it seems you don't mind at all. Pathetic.
Last edited by eliptik; 03-10-2008 at 02:32 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
