Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-17-2017, 11:28 AM
 
12,772 posts, read 7,990,107 times
Reputation: 4332

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I explained my reasoning. Feel free to try and dispute it.
I don't need to dispute the fact that you don't have the ability to predict a "what if" scenario with any real level of certainty, especially considering the fact that plenty of "experts" got the whole thing wrong with treasure troves of data and analysis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-17-2017, 12:12 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,273,228 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by t206 View Post
I don't need to dispute the fact that you don't have the ability to predict a "what if" scenario with any real level of certainty, especially considering the fact that plenty of "experts" got the whole thing wrong with treasure troves of data and analysis.
They had no desire to get it right. I noted before the elections that I believed Trump had a good chance at winning Michigan and Pennsylvania and explained why.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2017, 12:18 PM
 
34,078 posts, read 17,129,438 times
Reputation: 17234
Sanders and HRC would have fared equally in Philly. That wasn't a dropoff due to NAFTA, nor deplorables, but Obama created a once in our lives increase in turnout. Not transferable.

So I do not see Sanders winning Pa, as he would still get crushed in western, social values led, Pa. Just like HRC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2017, 12:48 PM
 
12,772 posts, read 7,990,107 times
Reputation: 4332
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
They had no desire to get it right. I noted before the elections that I believed Trump had a good chance at winning Michigan and Pennsylvania and explained why.
While I may somewhat agree with that since many seemed to be Hillary cheerleaders, it dosen't increase your ability to be right about knowing Sanders would win. Unfortunately (and not because I wanted him to win) he would have been subject to a Trump nickname like Dopey Bernie, plus Sanders was pretty naive during the debates with Clinton, so who knows what traps he would have either been lured into, or just stumbled into inadvertently. These two factors plus a bunch of other unknowns make your prediction no more accurate than a coin flip would have been.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2017, 01:18 PM
 
73,075 posts, read 62,706,187 times
Reputation: 21950
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Sanders would have won. Just as the (D)'s refuse to understand that they lost for one reason, Hillary, and they seem intent on making the same mistakes, others refuse to understand that Sanders would have very likely won if he had been the candidate.

Sanders does NOT lost Wisconsin or Michigan. He campaigns hard in Pennsylvania unlike Hillary. He did not have the baggage Hillary had in Philadelphia.

Maybe he doesn't get a 4 million vote advantage in California but he would have won it.
I voted for Bernie Sanders in the Democratic Primary. I wanted him to win. Instead we Hilary Clinton. I thought "fine. I will vote for anyone on the Republican side as long as it isn't Donald Trump". Surprise. Donald Trump won the Republican Primary. At that point, I said "forget it. I'm going 3rd party".

We got stuck with two of the worst candidates on the D and R sides. Why we got them, I don't know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2017, 03:54 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,273,228 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNJ1960 View Post
Sanders and HRC would have fared equally in Philly. That wasn't a dropoff due to NAFTA, nor deplorables, but Obama created a once in our lives increase in turnout. Not transferable.

So I do not see Sanders winning Pa, as he would still get crushed in western, social values led, Pa. Just like HRC.
He would. He would have done far better in the East. Hillary didn't lose Philly because of Nafta. She lost it because of Obama's policies that enriched the 1% over the middle and lower classes. Q.E. for one. Trying to enact another trade agreement that would have only benefitted Wall Street. Sanders would have campaigned there relentlessly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2017, 03:56 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,273,228 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by t206 View Post
While I may somewhat agree with that since many seemed to be Hillary cheerleaders, it dosen't increase your ability to be right about knowing Sanders would win. Unfortunately (and not because I wanted him to win) he would have been subject to a Trump nickname like Dopey Bernie, plus Sanders was pretty naive during the debates with Clinton, so who knows what traps he would have either been lured into, or just stumbled into inadvertently. These two factors plus a bunch of other unknowns make your prediction no more accurate than a coin flip would have been.
Sanders support did not care about name calling. Sanders would have talked specifics in the debate. Things that were drawing huge crowds to hear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2017, 03:57 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,273,228 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by green_mariner View Post
I voted for Bernie Sanders in the Democratic Primary. I wanted him to win. Instead we Hilary Clinton. I thought "fine. I will vote for anyone on the Republican side as long as it isn't Donald Trump". Surprise. Donald Trump won the Republican Primary. At that point, I said "forget it. I'm going 3rd party".

We got stuck with two of the worst candidates on the D and R sides. Why we got them, I don't know.
I along with many others did the same. (though there is NO way I could ever vote for someone like Jeb or Christie.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2017, 04:44 PM
 
73,075 posts, read 62,706,187 times
Reputation: 21950
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I along with many others did the same. (though there is NO way I could ever vote for someone like Jeb or Christie.)
As time goes on, I've become more of an Independent. I'm registered as a Democrat(since 2004, and I ironically voted for a Republican, the only time I voted for a Republican). However, I've become more Independent. I voted for Gary Johnson. I felt like some of what he stood for was more in line with me. I believe marijuana should be legalized. I feel that Stop and Frisk violates my Constitutional rights.

And some of the things Trump has said turned me off.

-I lost respect for him when he did that "I like soldiers who weren't captured" comment. That is a slap in the face to veterans. I get that John McCain did something stupid to get himself captured. However, Trump has no room to talk. He tried dodging the draft several times. Saying what he said to someone who actually served this country under those circumstances is absolutely disrespectful.
-President Trump tweeted "Our great African American President hasn't exactly had a positive impact on the thugs who are so happily and openly destroying Baltimore!". I get that people don't like the rioting. However, President Trump went after former President Obama, and brought his race into it. Trump went racial, and did it in such a way as to say "you're Black, why don't you do something about it"?
-Trump retweeted a Neo-Nazi's falsified statistics on Black crime and White genocide. And then Trump said "I don't check my sources".
-Trump called the Pope a pawn of the Mexican government
-There is also Trump's lewd comments about women.
-President Trump has said he would like to see a national stop and frisk policy implemented. I know where that will go. Racial profiling nationwide.
-And then there is President Trump's feigned attempts at getting the Black vote. The "vote for me what do you have to lose" comment was kind of comical. When he said this, he wasn't address a crowd of African-Americans in Milwaukee. He was in West Bend, WI in with a majority White crowd. And then in Redding,CA, he singles out a Black person nearby and screams "there goes my African-American over there". Stupid stuff.

How Trump could be so crass, and still get the Presidency is beyond me. Unless there are some people that either overlook his crassness, or relate to his crass ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2017, 05:08 PM
 
34,078 posts, read 17,129,438 times
Reputation: 17234
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
He would. He would have done far better in the East. Hillary didn't lose Philly because of Nafta. She lost it because of Obama's policies that enriched the 1% over the middle and lower classes. Q.E. for one. Trying to enact another trade agreement that would have only benefitted Wall Street. Sanders would have campaigned there relentlessly.
Sanders would have done no better than HRC, who did as well as Kerry and Gore. Philly was an area HRC did not dramatically underperform DNC norms in. One of the few..LOL. We know precisely why Philly turnout spiked for BO. Its not repeatable. Sanders does not create that special pull.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top