Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you think the primaries for all states should be done on the same day just like the general elect
Yes 29 49.15%
No 23 38.98%
Other (please explain in your post) 7 11.86%
Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-13-2017, 08:30 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,719,065 times
Reputation: 14818

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by robr2 View Post
I agree. The Presidential election should last less than 9 months:

February - announcement
June - national primaries
September - debate 1
October - debate 2
November - election.
This.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-13-2017, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,768,486 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellion1999 View Post
again, if you do that then candidates will treat it like the general election and just focus and only spend money in a few key states and ignore the rest.

the vetting process shoud be long. We need to do it by region, 8 states or so at a time.
Yes, I would support your system as well. With the caveat that the order of timing rotate every cycle. Part of the problem is that undue attention is paid to the first primaries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2017, 08:56 AM
 
Location: South Carolina
21,025 posts, read 27,287,153 times
Reputation: 6000
Political party primaries should not be held at the time of the general election. You will end up with multiple political parties running many candidates. As no candidate is likely to have a majority vote, you have a nationwide runoff after the general election. This system would make the electoral college useless.

Political parties should determine their candidate for an office ahead of the general election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2017, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,768,486 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carolina Knight View Post
Political party primaries should not be held at the time of the general election. You will end up with multiple political parties running many candidates. As no candidate is likely to have a majority vote, you have a nationwide runoff after the general election. This system would make the electoral college useless.

Political parties should determine their candidate for an office ahead of the general election.
??????? The discussion here is whether all primaries should be held on the same day. Not whether the primaries and the general should be on the same day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2017, 09:21 AM
 
Location: Minneapolis
2,526 posts, read 3,054,392 times
Reputation: 4343
I voted “other†because I don’t think there should be primaries at all. What I mean by that is that I don’t think the federal government or any of the states should facilitate the selection process used by political parties to determine their candidates.

The Republican and Democratic political parties are both private entities. Those political parties, as well as other parties, should certainly be free to select candidates via primaries, caucuses, numbers drawn from a hat, or any other method they choose. — completely at their own expense.

However, it shouldn’t be the role of the federal, state, or local governments to provide venues, machinery, or logistics for the internal selection processes of private political parties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2017, 09:33 AM
 
Location: NY/LA
4,663 posts, read 4,554,093 times
Reputation: 4140
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilnewbie View Post
How? The media keeps saying they give influence but I don't understand how... do people in another state vote based on what another state says? That seems a little dumb for people to do...
Momentum influences who comes out to vote and who gets funding.

By the time the Republican primaries were held in New York and California, pretty much everyone but Trump had already been eliminated. Just those two states total about 8 million registered Republicans who never got the same options that voters from Iowa and New Hampshire had to choose from.

Throw in all the other states that voted afterwards and how many other moderate Republicans never had the opportunity to let their preference count?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2017, 08:58 AM
 
5,281 posts, read 6,219,958 times
Reputation: 3131
I could go for it if you had something like three rounds- total field in election 1 winnowed down to 4. Then a second election to winnow it down to 2. Then the final to pick a candidate.


If you simply throw them all on the ballot and someone has the potential to win the whole shebang with 20-30% of the vote because of vote splits I think its unfair to the majority.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2017, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,562,839 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by TTG2020 View Post
Do you think the primaries for all states should be done on the same day just like the general election?
Nope

Next easy question, please.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2017, 10:02 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,660,176 times
Reputation: 21097
No. I don't think they should be held on the same day.

But I do think they should take the importance of Iowa & NH out of it.

Move the first race to a real battleground state like North Carolina.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2017, 11:25 AM
 
3,221 posts, read 1,740,449 times
Reputation: 2197
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
No. I don't think they should be held on the same day.

But I do think they should take the importance of Iowa & NH out of it.
For once I agree with you Waldo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top