|
03-16-2008, 10:55 AM
|
|
|
|
1,318 posts, read 2,388,439 times
Reputation: 409
|
|
|
LOOKS LIKE PELOSI IS GOING TO STAND IN HILLARY'S WAY OF PERSUADING THOSE SUPER DELEGATES!
Pelosi's Delegate Stance Boosts Obama
March 14, 2008 6:08 PM
ABC News' Teddy Davis Reports: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told ABC News' George Stephanopoulos on Friday that it would be "harmful" to Democrats if superdelegates were to give the party's presidential nomination to a candidate who is trailing in the delegates awarded in primaries and caucuses.
"If the votes of the superdelegates overturn what's happened in the elections," said Pelosi, "it would be harmful to the Democratic Party."
Although Pelosi offered her assessment without directly referencing Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., her comments lend considerable support to the Illinois Democrat.
Obama leads Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., in pledged delegates: 1,396 to 1,241. Because of the proportional system used by the Democratic Party to allocate delegates, Obama is widely expected to remain in front of Clinton in pledged delegates at the conclusion of the primary season.
Political prognosticators give Clinton more of a chance of catching, or even surpassing, Obama in the national popular vote but Pelosi argued that superdelegates should follow the pledged-delegate, not the popular-vote, leader.
"But what if one candidate has won the popular vote and the other candidate has won the delegates?" asked Stephanopoulos.
"But it's a delegate race," Pelosi replied. "The way the system works is that the delegates choose the nominee."
Pelosi's comments to Stephanopoulos, which were made in Washington, D.C., air Friday evening on ABC News' "World News with Charles Gibson."
The full interview with Pelosi airs Sunday morning on "This Week with George Stephanopoulos."
|
|
03-16-2008, 12:08 PM
|
|
|
|
377 posts, read 667,937 times
Reputation: 106
|
|
|
Could this just be the final cement needed to entomb the Clinton War Machine for now?
|
|
03-16-2008, 06:18 PM
|
|
|
|
1,318 posts, read 2,388,439 times
Reputation: 409
|
|
|
I really hope so before Hillary destroys everything. Some one needs to slap her and say "snap out of it" and do a little "Moonstruck" on her.
|
|
03-16-2008, 07:11 PM
|
|
|
|
7,289 posts, read 8,399,889 times
Reputation: 7756
|
|
|
Hilary's got nothing to lose. In 2012 she'll be too old to run again. If she loses now, she's bascially Ted Kennedy in a dress (or pants suit).
Why wouldn't she go all out now?
Obama is 46. Four years to get his act together and get a believable answer on Rev. Wright that will play in middle America, and definitive plans for the economy and health care would be beneficial.
Whoever is elected will probably only serve 4 years anyway due to the upcoming depression.
|
|
03-16-2008, 07:27 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Washington state
7,208 posts, read 9,131,268 times
Reputation: 1895
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fopt65
Hilary's got nothing to lose. In 2012 she'll be too old to run again. If she loses now, she's bascially Ted Kennedy in a dress (or pants suit).
Why wouldn't she go all out now?
Obama is 46. Four years to get his act together and get a believable answer on Rev. Wright that will play in middle America, and definitive plans for the economy and health care would be beneficial.
Whoever is elected will probably only serve 4 years anyway due to the upcoming depression.
|
If Hillary were to steal the nomination, though I wouldn't vote for McCain, my wishes would be for him to win. Several of those reasons you mentioned play into it and also I think it would be best for the Democratic party in the long run. I mean, can you imagine, the losses the Dems would suffer in the off year election of 2010 if Hillary was president? The party needs to be purged of the Clintons and the DLC once and for all. |
|
03-16-2008, 08:38 PM
|
|
|
|
5,274 posts, read 14,020,431 times
Reputation: 5874
|
|
|
I disagree with Pelosi.
The caususus doesn't really guage the popular vote. If there were a purely popular vote, Clinton may be the leader. Add to that, people within the party change their minds over time. Some lean towards one candidate and vote that way, but after they learn more about them, lean the other way.
I think the super delegates need to assess the situation their way and vote as they see fit.
|
|
03-16-2008, 09:22 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: New Jersey
316 posts, read 579,292 times
Reputation: 71
|
|
|
I'm not quite sure how anybody figures Hillary to win the popular vote: If she is slated to win any more states, that would probably be just PA.
Besides. Mrs. Pelosi speaks for the DNC. That is surely the majority of the opinion of all super delegates. Obama has this thing lined up one way or the other.
If Mrs. pelosi publicized her views, she must not have any worries doing so.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
