|
03-25-2008, 12:05 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Santa Monica
4,714 posts, read 8,262,682 times
Reputation: 1052
|
|
|
McCain made the remark that U.S. troops might be in Iraq for another 100 years. Bad move on his part.
|
|
03-25-2008, 12:33 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Here
11,555 posts, read 13,479,658 times
Reputation: 6917
|
|
|
Funny thing is, Obama's cheif military advisor General Merrill “Tony” McPeak made that IDENTICAL statement. Go figure.
|
|
03-25-2008, 12:46 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Western North Carolina
7,275 posts, read 9,834,728 times
Reputation: 16897
|
|
|
Let's not forget the fact that Barack Obama is the ONLY candidate out of the three running who voted AGAINST this war in the first place.
|
|
03-25-2008, 12:56 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Chicago
4,687 posts, read 9,777,804 times
Reputation: 3195
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 01Snake
Funny thing is, Obama's cheif military advisor General Merrill “Tony” McPeak made that IDENTICAL statement. Go figure.
|
Your ability to read, comprehend, and analyze leaves a bit to be desired. McPeak's statement was made in 2003 before the war started. He was saying that in the context of what a post-war Iraq would look like, saying that, if it's successful, we'll be there for 100 years.
As the hundreds of millions of dollars in establishing a fortress like embassy and a number of permanent bases show, he was right. It was the plan, contrary to Bush's misleading claims of "staying there as long as necessary, and not a moment longer".
To make an argument that this statement is the equivolent to John McCain directly claiming, 5 years and 4000 dead into the war, that we should be there 100 years is laughable.
Last edited by jdiddy; 03-25-2008 at 01:26 PM..
|
|
03-25-2008, 01:24 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Here
11,555 posts, read 13,479,658 times
Reputation: 6917
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdiddy
Your ability to read, comprehend, and analyze leaves a bit to be desired. McPeak's statement was made in 2003 before the war started. He was saying that in the context of what a post-war Iraq would look like, saying that, if it's successful, we'll be there for 100 years.
As the hundreds of millions of dollars in establishing a fortress like embassy and a number of permanent bases, he was right. It was the plan, contrary to Bush's misleading claims of "staying there as long as necessary, and not a moment longer".
To make an argument that this statement is the equivolent to John McCain directly claiming, 5 years and 4000 dead into the war, that we should be there 100 years is laughable.
|
Your ability to interpret what McCain said leaves a lot to be desired. |
|
03-25-2008, 01:28 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Chicago
4,687 posts, read 9,777,804 times
Reputation: 3195
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 01Snake
Your ability to interpret what McCain said leaves a lot to be desired.
|
Quote:
Q: President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years — (cut off by McCain)
McCAIN: Make it a hundred.
Q: Is that … (cut off)
McCAIN: We’ve been in South Korea … we’ve been in Japan for 60 years. We’ve been in South Korea 50 years or so. That would be fine with me. As long as Americans …
Q: [tries to say something]
McCAIN: As long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed. That’s fine with me, I hope that would be fine with you, if we maintain a presence in a very volatile part of the world where Al Queada is training and equipping and recruiting and motivating people every single day.
|
So he didn't say we should be there for 100 years? What does "Make it a hundred" mean then? |
|
03-25-2008, 01:28 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Here
11,555 posts, read 13,479,658 times
Reputation: 6917
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by montanamom
Let's not forget the fact that Barack Obama is the ONLY candidate out of the three running who voted AGAINST this war in the first place.
|
How did he vote against the war when he wasn't even in the Senate yet??  |
|
03-25-2008, 01:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Here
11,555 posts, read 13,479,658 times
Reputation: 6917
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdiddy
So he didn't say we should be there for 100 years? What does "Make it a hundred" mean then?
|
Sure he did, meaning having an embassy there like we do in several other countries. He did not mean, like the Dems love to imply, that he wants to remain in Iraq fighting as we are now for a 100 years. |
|
03-25-2008, 03:52 PM
|
|
|
|
2,215 posts, read 3,518,502 times
Reputation: 507
|
|
|
Yes Obama said he would never make a decision on his own about Iraq and would seek the advice of military experts and his cabinet to make these decisions. Holy crap, if it were left up to the military experts on the ground then Obama will have us there for the same time frame as McCain!
Only McCain has the knowledge to make quicker, better more in depth decisions because he is a military man and Obama, well, he wouldn't last one day in any boot camp.
|
|
03-25-2008, 04:05 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,098 posts, read 38,162,222 times
Reputation: 4936
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by montanamom
Let's not forget the fact that Barack Obama is the ONLY candidate out of the three running who voted AGAINST this war in the first place.
|
Ah - no. He did not "VOTE" against the war. |
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
