Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-23-2018, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,201 posts, read 19,282,267 times
Reputation: 38273

Advertisements

Quote:
Six-term U.S. Rep. Doug Lamborn of Colorado Springs should be kept off the Republican primary ballot this year, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled Monday in a decision that — if upheld — could end the longtime conservative lawmaker’s congressional career.

The ruling finds in favor of a lawsuit that contended Lamborn didn’t properly petition his way onto the ballot because of problems with those he hired to gather signatures for his re-election bid.
https://www.denverpost.com/2018/04/2...f-2018-ballot/

This district would remain red, but it would be yet another GOP incumbent out of office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-23-2018, 04:34 PM
 
Location: Long Island
8,840 posts, read 4,819,280 times
Reputation: 6479
You would think he would know by now he needed valid signatures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 05:37 PM
 
79,908 posts, read 44,336,218 times
Reputation: 17209
Why was it so hard for him to find someone in state to gather signatures?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 06:58 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,226 posts, read 22,453,297 times
Reputation: 23866
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Why was it so hard for him to find someone in state to gather signatures?
I guess we would have to read the court records to find the answer to that question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 07:13 PM
 
37,313 posts, read 60,009,828 times
Reputation: 25342
are there any reasons to appeal the verdict? Likely to go to Supreme Court?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 07:14 PM
 
37,313 posts, read 60,009,828 times
Reputation: 25342
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Why was it so hard for him to find someone in state to gather signatures?
You mean he used a firm from outside Colorado
Or they hired people from outside the state?
I can't read the link--paywall
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 07:39 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,570,771 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
You mean he used a firm from outside Colorado
Or they hired people from outside the state?
I can't read the link--paywall
The Denver District Court ruled that one of the gatherers was not a resident, and invalidated 58 signatures he collected. It found that the other — who had gathered more 269 signatures — was.

But the Colorado Supreme Court, which reviewed the case upon appeal, rejected the lower court’s ruling on the residency of the second gatherer, Ryan Tipple, which was based off the legal theory that he intended to move to the state.

“Tipple’s stated intent to live in Colorado in the future is relevant only if he has a fixed habitation in Colorado to which he presently intends to return,” the Supreme Court’s ruling said. “The record reveals none. … All of the objective record evidence regarding his residency at the time he circulated the petition for the Lamborn Campaign indicated that his primary place of abode was in California.”

The ruling left Lamborn 58 signatures short of 1,000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 07:43 PM
 
37,313 posts, read 60,009,828 times
Reputation: 25342
Yes--got it to open--thanks though
Found this comment interesting “The Colorado Supreme Court just provided an avenue to have a federal court strike down residency requirements for candidate circulators,” Deputy Colorado Secretary of State Suzanne Staiert said in a statement
You don't usually see someone happy (?) to have its Supreme Court leave open an opportunity for a FEDERAL court to rewrite its Constitution...
And I bet that does not happen for this case...

Sloppy work on the part of the firm he hired to do the canvassing...
Wonder if it was someone in his own campaign who failed to do proper oversight==ouch!
Given the size of his district (which seems solid GOP) what percentage is 1000 signatures?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 08:11 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,219 posts, read 19,524,553 times
Reputation: 5314
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
Yes--got it to open--thanks though
Found this comment interesting “The Colorado Supreme Court just provided an avenue to have a federal court strike down residency requirements for candidate circulators,” Deputy Colorado Secretary of State Suzanne Staiert said in a statement
You don't usually see someone happy (?) to have its Supreme Court leave open an opportunity for a FEDERAL court to rewrite its Constitution...
And I bet that does not happen for this case...

Sloppy work on the part of the firm he hired to do the canvassing...
Wonder if it was someone in his own campaign who failed to do proper oversight==ouch!
Given the size of his district (which seems solid GOP) what percentage is 1000 signatures?
Not sure if someone not registered with the party can sign, but as of the end of March there were a little over 182,000 Registered Republicans in the district (almost double the amount of Democrats).

The district is centered around Colorado Springs, and Trump won it by 24 so should be very safe for the GOP, but this is certainly a big screw up, especially for someone who has been in Congress for almost 12 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2018, 01:46 AM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,636 posts, read 16,622,096 times
Reputation: 6066
Never understood this rule. I guess it's a way to keep from having 3,000 names on the ballot , but meh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top