Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-10-2018, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,466,801 times
Reputation: 14459

Advertisements

I try not to get involved in gang wars.

Let the criminals hash it out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-10-2018, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,639 posts, read 16,680,256 times
Reputation: 6081
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Yes you do understand.
No, i really dont, the argument doesnt make sense unless you assume everyone would have gotten behind Bernie, which you yourself has said isnt true.

Thats the entire point of yours and PCALMIKE's posts here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2018, 01:01 PM
 
3,121 posts, read 1,591,003 times
Reputation: 6462
The dems and their party lost the election. I wouldnt talk if I was them since they couldnt appeal to the whole country. Bernie was doing pretty good until the dirty dealing by the national committee. Keep the nonsense up and the D party will lose the next Presidential election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2018, 01:01 PM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,775 posts, read 18,542,411 times
Reputation: 34713
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Your post contradicts itself. He purposefully derailed a democratic candidate simply because they did not agree on a couple of issues.

That is clearly not "doing the bidding" of the party, as you put it.
You really love making statements that fail to address what the poster has written and that arrive at conclusions based on a misreading of information.

Also, Bernie Sanders did not purposefully derail anyone. He, like any other person had the right to do, mounted a serious primarily challenge during the 2016 Democrat nominating process. The Democrat Party was the natural fit for Sanders, given his many years of caucusing with the Democrat Party in the US Senate and supporting Democrat Party policies and causes. Yes, that is doing the bidding of the party and it would have continued had he been elected. That the DNC wanted no challenge to its preferred candidate and went out of its way to rig the system in her favor doesn't alter this point.

But the Democrat Party can continue to shoot itself in the foot with nonsense like this. I certainly think it only increases the chance that President Trump is reelected!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2018, 01:03 PM
 
21,991 posts, read 15,799,232 times
Reputation: 12954
I like Bernie a lot and I agree with him on many things. But I don't think he would be a good president for this country with the political climate we are in. I wish it were otherwise but it's not. As a liberal, I feel like we need a Democratic candidate in 2020 that is just as combative as Trump is but with intelligence and maturity. That's a huge weakness for Trump. I don't think we should nominate a woman because women don't support women. Because we don't have as strong a bench as I would like to see at this time, I would be open to Howard Schultz if he could win the Democratic nomination but a lot of things can happen between now and then.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Williepaws View Post
The dems and their party lost the election. I wouldnt talk if I was them since they couldnt appeal to the whole country. Bernie was doing pretty good until the dirty dealing by the national committee. Keep the nonsense up and the D party will lose the next Presidential election.
Trump does not appeal to the whole country!!! He's the first president in my lifetime that didn't remotely moderate after the election, he instead goes out of his way to provoke and insult the half of the country that pays the most in taxes. Trump won by 70,000 votes in three states and lost the popular vote by 3 million. If 35,000 voters had gone the other way in those three states, Trump would have lost. 35,000 is miniscule. Trump threaded the thinnest of needles and his supporters act like he has overwhelming support which he's never had.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2018, 01:08 PM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,775 posts, read 18,542,411 times
Reputation: 34713
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
No, you are not clear. We aren't trying to punish Sanders, we are telling him that if he wants to use the party's infrastructure and receive all its benefits, he has to join the party.

Why is this so hard for so many of you to understand?
Gotcha. So your party, in an attempt to ensure party loyalty for a man who has proven himself loyal to the party in everything but an official name change (what more could you ask for???), passes a rules change that does nothing more than anger a sizable number said man's supporters? https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...porters-634998

Yeah, seems really bright. NOT.

Of course, Sanders identified as a Democrat during the 2016 campaign: https://www.cnn.com/2016/02/03/polit...ll-highlights/

Quote:
Meanwhile, Sanders, a self-proclaimed democratic socialist, found himself defending his own credentials as a member of the Democratic Party, noting that the party's leadership on Capitol Hill has placed him in high-ranking positions on congressional committees."Of course I am a Democrat and running for the Democratic nomination," he said.
But, hey, I enjoy seeing this play out
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2018, 01:10 PM
 
21,991 posts, read 15,799,232 times
Reputation: 12954
It's amusing watching Trump supporters trying to stir the pot with Democrats. They did the same thing with Hillary in 2008, acting like "poor Hillary" when she lost only to disembowel her in 2016.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2018, 01:12 PM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,639 posts, read 16,680,256 times
Reputation: 6081
Quote:
Originally Posted by prospectheightsresident View Post
You really love making statements that fail to address what the poster has written and that arrive at conclusions based on a misreading of information.

Also, Bernie Sanders did not purposefully derail anyone. He, like any other person had the right to do, mounted a serious primarily challenge during the 2016 Democrat nominating process. The Democrat Party was the natural fit for Sanders, given his many years of caucusing with the Democrat Party in the US Senate and supporting Democrat Party policies and causes. Yes, that is doing the bidding of the party and it would have continued had he been elected. That the DNC wanted no challenge **** preferred candidate and went out of its way to rig the system in her favor doesn't alter this point.

But the Democrat Party can continue to shoot itself in the foot with nonsense like this. I certainly think it only increases the chance that President Trump is reelected!
No, you simply do not seem to understand the context of the discussion you dropped in to.

What i am talking about is not Sanders simply running in the primary, its he and his group/campaign continuing an internal party fight after having lost.

If you geniuinly didnt understand that, fine, but it looks more like you .... to quote yourself " really love making statements that fail to address what the poster has written and that arrive at conclusions based on a misreading of information. "
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2018, 01:14 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,574,937 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
I like Bernie a lot and I agree with him on many things. But I don't think he would be a good president for this country with the political climate we are in. I wish it were otherwise but it's not. As a liberal, I feel like we need a Democratic candidate in 2020 that is just as combative as Trump is but with intelligence and maturity. That's a huge weakness for Trump. I don't think we should nominate a woman because women don't support women. Because we don't have as strong a bench as I would like to see at this time, I would be open to Howard Schultz if he could win the Democratic nomination but a lot of things can happen between now and then.
Or, how about Michael Eric Dyson?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2018, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,775 posts, read 18,542,411 times
Reputation: 34713
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
No, you simply do not seem to understand the context of the discussion you dropped in to.

What i am talking about is not Sanders simply running in the primary, its he and his group/campaign continuing an internal party fight after having lost.

If you geniuinly didnt understand that, fine, but it looks more like you .... to quote yourself " really love making statements that fail to address what the poster has written and that arrive at conclusions based on a misreading of information. "
Nope, you just continue making assumptions/coming to conclusions that are false and ignore the context of my posts. But its not the first time you've done so and it won't be the last.

Do explain in detail how I contradicted myself (and objectively so), though, as you haven't done so now. I get that you may disagree with my analysis, and that's OK. But that hardly equates to what you claim it did.

And internal party fights are not inherently a bad thing and are happening with people who are "registered Democrats." Seriously, though, the internal party fighting wouldn't change if Sanders declared himself as a Democrat and registered to vote as a member of that party. This makes the proposed rule change even more loony and counterproductive to winning. But, again, I don't see that as a bad thing!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top