Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-10-2018, 03:05 AM
 
33,315 posts, read 12,575,437 times
Reputation: 14947

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cruitr View Post
Who is older... Trump or Hillary?
I didn't vote for either one of them, but didn't Trump keep up a more hectic schedule in the closing weeks of the campaign (that took more stamina) ?

Even if that didn't end up actually being the case....wasn't it the perception?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-10-2018, 03:06 AM
 
Location: Coastal San Diego
5,024 posts, read 7,583,417 times
Reputation: 4055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Lee View Post
I hope the dem party lets her run again.

Attachment 199779



The question should be, who is in better shape for their age, we all should know by now that it is not fall down Hillary.
When do we get to see Trump's medical records?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 03:49 AM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,608 posts, read 16,586,021 times
Reputation: 6055
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Donald may be less of a war monger. I'll give you that. He pretends to avoid wars while Hillary makes up pretend stuff to get us involved.
It it helps you sleep at night to operate off of such a false premise, then go right ahead, but at some point in your life, you will have to have a mental reckoning with yourself.

As far as I know, Clinton was no more of a "hawk" than anyone else, with the exception of random "doves" who claim we shouldnt do anything.

Those people are so deep in the minority that none of them could ever come close to the Presidency. Even Sanders when questioned on the issue said he would use force.

So again, your arguments dont make sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 04:31 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,305,539 times
Reputation: 27863
Quote:
Originally Posted by tillman7 View Post
Why not? Hillary won in 2016 and knows Donald Trump knows she did. The demographics are in her favor in 2020, but Putin is in Donald Trump's favor in 2020.
Hillary won? Hummmm

That sure looks like Trump that is running the country.

What am I missing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 04:36 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,273,228 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
It it helps you sleep at night to operate off of such a false premise, then go right ahead, but at some point in your life, you will have to have a mental reckoning with yourself.

As far as I know, Clinton was no more of a "hawk" than anyone else, with the exception of random "doves" who claim we shouldnt do anything.

Those people are so deep in the minority that none of them could ever come close to the Presidency. Even Sanders when questioned on the issue said he would use force.

So again, your arguments dont make sense.
There hasn't been a war she hasn't either supported or helped push us into it. I will sleep fine at night.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 05:28 AM
 
827 posts, read 662,303 times
Reputation: 1395
our new Supreme Court judge is named!
Grab the popcorn, kids! This meltdown is going to be fun to watch!


Make the democrats cry again, Elect President Trump 2020.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 06:08 AM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,457,569 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by turkey-head View Post
Not even the DNC is stupid enough to allow this.
Oh yes they are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 06:22 AM
 
Location: Florida & Cebu, Philippines
2,805 posts, read 3,258,176 times
Reputation: 2910
Quote:
Originally Posted by cruitr View Post
When do we get to see Trump's medical records?
When would we get to see Hillary's real medical records.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDa9eArn4SQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 06:32 AM
 
14,994 posts, read 23,916,093 times
Reputation: 26539
Quote:
Originally Posted by emm74 View Post
And no, I haven't lost that argument, there has been a push to eliminate the EC for decades now, and eventually fairness will prevail. One person, one vote will mean something, even if people in smaller states lose their small state privilege of controlling elections.
Dude...reality check time. You lost the argument. It was all the talk a year and a half ago, it's disappeared into nothingness. No matter that the system works and you want to fix something that is not broken - in that presidents elected seem to switch off between DEM and GOP every other election - but it part of our constitution. It will mean a two thirds vote in each house, if by some miracle it passes there it will then need a ratification in 38 states to change the constitution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2018, 07:15 AM
 
5,937 posts, read 4,705,227 times
Reputation: 4631
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
A quick google search says there were 4 or 5 other candidates, One being the Governor of New York, another being the Senator from Tennessee, Stevenson simply beat them at the convention.
He surely did. And there were 5 other candidates. But were they actual contenders? Or were they the "Jim Webbs", "Lincoln Chaffees" and Martin O'Malleys?"

Back in 1956, only 18 states held primaries. The other 32 states, the state parties selected the candidates. It wasn't like the people said "Yeah, let's give this guy another shot!" This seemed to be mostly a closed door political elitist nomination.

This is mostly academic. I do find it intriguing yet unsurprising that we haven't had repeat nominations since then (aside from Nixon). In the case of Hillary, as much as a dislike the primary process and their superdelegates, in theory the party could help quash any attempt at her running by refusing support. She could of course still run and she could win, superdelegates be-damned. I think it really depends on whether she wants to do it and how much she "owns" the DNC still.

I'd rather she didn't. Been there, done that. She had her shot. She lost (fair or not fair). We all need to move on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top