Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-08-2019, 12:03 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,834 posts, read 7,436,378 times
Reputation: 8966

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
Godwin's law threshold achieved.

And no, I will not be bullied or shouted down by you. Not now. Not ever.
Godwin's law comparisons are absurd. That is a point that says your argument is not logical if all you have is insults.

What I have are facts and science, what you have is irrational fear and lack of understanding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-08-2019, 12:06 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,546,133 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Godwin's law comparisons are absurd. That is a point that says your argument is not logical if all you have is insults.

What I have are facts and science, what you have is irrational fear and lack of understanding.
If you want to talk about the socialist left's global warming alarmism agenda, please go do it somewhere else. This is an election related thread in the election subforum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2019, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,834 posts, read 7,436,378 times
Reputation: 8966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
If you want to talk about the socialist left's global warming alarmism agenda, please go do it somewhere else. This is an election related thread in the election subforum.
Negative.

It is one of the biggest issues in the Dem primary, because most people voting in the Dem primary are not denialists and understand the urgency of the issue.

Hence, I will bring it up anytime I so choose in a discussion about the Dem primary. I don't get the impression that you will even be voting in the Dem primary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2019, 12:19 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,546,133 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Negative.

It is one of the biggest issues in the Dem primary, because most people voting in the Dem primary are not denialists and understand the urgency of the issue.

Hence, I will bring it up anytime I so choose in a discussion about the Dem primary. I don't get the impression that you will even be voting in the Dem primary.
I WILL be voting in the Democrat primary.

All you do with this Nazi holocaust comparative "Denialist" accusations is demonstrate what a bully you aspire to be and how intolerant you are of others. Also, that you favor doctrinaire, "Politically correct" speech codes applied to everyone in the political sphere - all compliant with your leftist approved narratives - and anyone who dares not to comply will be attacked with the most nasty and incendiary rhetoric that you can muster - or worse.

That is what this is and that is what you are doing here, regardless of whether you are willing to take responsibility for your attitudes and your actions or not (it appears not).

This is what the cultural Marxism embracing Democrat left has become in our country. If you guys loose this election against Trump - as you should - this will be at the core of the reason why.

Last edited by Spartacus713; 09-08-2019 at 12:29 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2019, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,834 posts, read 7,436,378 times
Reputation: 8966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
All you do with this Nazi holocaust comparative "Denialist" accusations is demonstrate what a bully you aspire to be and how intolerant you are of others.
I find it quite hilarious that you keep saying I have violated Godwin's law when you are the ONLY one in this thread who has mentioned Nazis or made comparisons to Nazis. LOL!

Regardless of whether you are voting in the Dem primary, you clearly are an uninformed Trumpist and thus I will decline to accept your proscription for what topics of discussion are acceptable in a Dem primary thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2019, 12:24 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,546,133 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
I find it quite hilarious that you keep saying I have violated Godwin's law when you are the ONLY one in this thread who has mentioned Nazis or made comparisons to Nazis. LOL!

Regardless of whether you are voting in the Dem primary, you clearly are not a democrat and thus I will decline to accept your proscription for what topics of discussion are acceptable in a Dem primary thread.
So you are refusing to take responsibility for your attitudes and your actions. Just as I predicted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2019, 04:06 PM
 
Location: Florida
14,968 posts, read 9,860,278 times
Reputation: 12092
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Deniers is a fit label.

There is no longer any reason to debate the reality of climate change.

Denying it is just as absurd in 2019 as denying evolution or claiming the earth is flat, or claiming the moon landing was a hoax, or any of the other absurd fact free denialist movements that reject factual scientifically based basic realities.

The science is clear and unequivocal.

I learned in grade school (a private right wing religious school by the way) that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and that greenhouse gasses cause warming. These facts did not use to be controversial. It's why Venus has a higher surface temperature than Mercury despite being farther from the sun.

The fact that CO2 concentration has increased 50% since the industrial revolution and deniers think there is some alternative explanation for this other than the billions of tons of carbon liberated from captured dead sources and pumped into the atmosphere is beyond absurd.
However 99% of science say life begins at conception. See how this denying thing works? but I digress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2019, 04:14 PM
 
Location: New York Area
35,262 posts, read 17,166,428 times
Reputation: 30413
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Deniers is a fit label.

There is no longer any reason to debate the reality of climate change.
The thirty-year moving average mean for NYC from July 10 to August 10, roughly, was 77° in the 1960's (covering the 1930's, 1940's and 1950's). The thirty-year moving average mean for NYC from July 10 to August 10, roughly, is 77° in the current decade (covering the 1980's, 1990's and the "double-oughts" or 2000-2009).

The thirty-year moving average mean for NYC for most of January, was 32 or 33° in the 1960's (covering the 1930's, 1940's and 1950's). The thirty-year moving average mean for NYC for most of January, roughly, is 32° or 33° in the current decade (covering the 1980's, 1990's and the "double-oughts" or 2000-2009).

Not much change. And actual temperatures are a reality check for a so-called "global" trend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2019, 04:35 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,834 posts, read 7,436,378 times
Reputation: 8966
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
The thirty-year moving average mean for NYC from July 10 to August 10, roughly, was 77° in the 1960's (covering the 1930's, 1940's and 1950's). The thirty-year moving average mean for NYC from July 10 to August 10, roughly, is 77° in the current decade (covering the 1980's, 1990's and the "double-oughts" or 2000-2009).

The thirty-year moving average mean for NYC for most of January, was 32 or 33° in the 1960's (covering the 1930's, 1940's and 1950's). The thirty-year moving average mean for NYC for most of January, roughly, is 32° or 33° in the current decade (covering the 1980's, 1990's and the "double-oughts" or 2000-2009).

Not much change. And actual temperatures are a reality check for a so-called "global" trend.
The average temperature has already increased almost 2 deg F since the industrial revolution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2019, 04:41 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,546,133 times
Reputation: 10096
Thanks for hijacking this election related thread for non-elec5ion related discussion. Appreciate it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top