Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So by the same logic, if polls overestimate Biden by 2.8%, Biden will win by 9.2%!!!!
It way to early to predict anything based on polls 18 months prior to the election. Oh, I am sorry 17 months. even if it wasn't too early, how many other polls showed Clinton way ahead with a few months, weeks or even days to go. Don't crack the champaign bottle quiet yet.
Actually- polls were accurate. Too many people ignored margin of error- all the states Hillary lost (except Wi) were either Trump leads or a HRC lead within the margin of error. A lead within the margin should be considered a tie. She performed within MOE by winning the popular vote by 2% as well.
The significance of two of those polls would be exceeding MOE. But in truth they don't matter for an entirely different reason- we're still 17 months from the election and its too early to have a good assessment.
not months ahead of time: she had a huge lead, plus she did in many or the national polls almost up to election day.
Biden has no chance against Trump...seriously the guy has no stage presence, passion or enthusiasm, looks just like Trump describes him "sleepy guy"... Elizabeth Warren or Pete Buttigeg (sp) has a much better chance at Trump. Of course the dems will nominate Biden and he will predictably lose... deja vu what happened with Hillary.
NC swing state, esp. w/ Charlotte, Raleigh, W/S, Greensboro and Wilmington, large cities leaning democratic. Outlying areas very red.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.