Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-04-2019, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,228 posts, read 22,475,003 times
Reputation: 23885

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Incorrect. ( As usual)
Tell that to Mitt Romney. Or Karl Rove. Big money no longer counts like it once did in our most recent elections.

That's why the Koch brothers quit making political donations entirely. They were just throwing their money away in the millions. Money just doesn't count. If anything it tends to work against the candidate who has too much of it.

The biggest donors saw the end was coming after 2016, and 2018 cinched it with the smaller big donors.

The Mercers have quit along with the Kochs, and almost all the others have followed their lead. The only big money that remains comes from individual crackpots, mostly old men, who have more to throw away than they'll ever need.

What does count now are the small donations. The $20 donations that pinch the person. Those donations mean that person is willing to work for the candidate, will stand out in the rain all day to vote. $20 dollars indicates a committed voter. $10,000,000 does not.

The $20 demands a lot more work for the candidate to obtain, but the payoff for the work is much better. Taking the big money is seen now as being a cop-out and toadying up to the ultra-wealthy.

In 2016, the only big money donor who was safe from those charges was the NRA, and now they're too broke to donate anything at all.

As always, Trump is oblivious to all this, so he'll spend like crazy. But since he's crazy, spending it won't help him win 2020.

Last edited by banjomike; 07-04-2019 at 01:47 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-04-2019, 01:49 PM
 
16,955 posts, read 16,804,391 times
Reputation: 10408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye77 View Post
Good on President Trump. Whatever happens in 2020, he is the greatest President in my long, long lifetime.


I tried to rep you but I ran out of rep points! This is true. This is your President for 2020!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2019, 01:54 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,230 posts, read 19,537,439 times
Reputation: 5330
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
It was initially $30,000,000. But a lot of it was "written off" meaning the taxpayers covered it. The RNC will be holding their convention in Charlotte in 2020. They are known for paying their bills.



Trump of course is out raising any of the Democrats by wide margin. $105,000,000 in the 2nd quarter is massive.
He didn't raise $105 million. Why are you lying about that? Trump raised $54 million, the RNC raised $51 million. They combined for $105 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2019, 02:38 PM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,747,311 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by banjomike View Post
.....

As always, Trump is oblivious to all this, so he'll spend like crazy. But since he's crazy, spending it won't help him win 2020.
Hmmmmm Nope.



The beat the 17 GOP contenders spending less than $30M of his own money. And he beat the pantsuit off Hillary Clinton spending a fraction of they money she spent.



You guys simply make up BS then repeat it as fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2019, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,831 posts, read 7,446,331 times
Reputation: 8966
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
WOW!

Crooked Pollsters say that Trump stands no chance of winning 2020, just like they did in 2016. Yet Trump fills venues with 10s of 1000s of people and now this.

Donald Trump Announces Massive $105 Million Second Quarter Fundraising Haul ‘No Democrat candidate can match this level of enthusiasm’

Real America stands with Trump.
If 2016 proved anything it's that money no longer really matters in our elections.

2020 will depend on turnout and whether enough people who hate the maniac (we know its a majority) turn out to oust him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2019, 03:42 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,687,695 times
Reputation: 9169
Money doesn't buy elections, just ask Meg Whitman how that worked out in the 2010 California gubernatorial race......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top