U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-23-2008, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,321 posts, read 43,460,776 times
Reputation: 7117

Advertisements

RealClearPolitics - 2008 Elections - Democratic Vote Count

What will they do about MI & FL
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-23-2008, 06:41 AM
j33
 
4,626 posts, read 13,680,936 times
Reputation: 1719
Well, given Obama's name wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan, I suspect that the most reasonable course of action would be to split the delegates evenly between both candidates or not seat them at all.

To award the delegates as they stand currently, given that both MI and FL choseto disregard the DNC, and the candidates both expressed their support of not seating the delegates and both agreed not to campaign in the states would be undemocratic, and quite frankly, insane.


Now, tell me, how many times must we go over this?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2008, 06:58 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,318 posts, read 21,547,678 times
Reputation: 18436
Quote:
Originally Posted by j33 View Post
Well, given Obama's name wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan, I suspect that the most reasonable course of action would be to split the delegates evenly between both candidates or not seat them at all.

To award the delegates as they stand currently, given that both MI and FL choseto disregard the DNC, and the candidates both expressed their support of not seating the delegates and both agreed not to campaign in the states would be undemocratic, and quite frankly, insane.


Now, tell me, how many times must we go over this?
Thanks for this post. My God, I am so sick of these Hillary supporters and their meaningless sense of desperation over MI and FL. Those 2 states DON'T MATTER. Who knows what would've happened in either state if Obama had campaigned in them or even been on the ballot in MI. He cut Hillary's 25% lead in PA to 9.4% in 2 weeks! Imagine what he could've accomplished in MI. MI is going Dem in the GE anyways.

FL, I'm skeptical of because they always seem to pick the wrong candidate and they don't know how to collect and tally votes correctly. Better they sit this one out. They'll have their chance to pick the wrong candidate YET AGAIN in the GE when they are sucked in by McCain.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2008, 07:10 AM
 
439 posts, read 586,905 times
Reputation: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by j33 View Post
Well, given Obama's name wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan, I suspect that the most reasonable course of action would be to split the delegates evenly between both candidates or not seat them at all.

To award the delegates as they stand currently, given that both MI and FL choseto disregard the DNC, and the candidates both expressed their support of not seating the delegates and both agreed not to campaign in the states would be undemocratic, and quite frankly, insane.


Now, tell me, how many times must we go over this?
Clinton did hold a big fundraiser in FL just before the election there so she was in the State. At the beginning the Democrats should have removed all names off the ballot in these two states. All voter in both States new that their vote would not count. So some of the blame has to be given to the Democratic Party.

I have to tell you Clinton would not even be going there if she was not behind. Let us too remember how the democrat nominee is chosen. Delegates. Not popular votes. Over the coarse of this campaign Clinton has tried hard to move the goal post. Rules are in place for this very reason. If she doesn't come out of this race with more delegates then she isn't going to be the Nominee. Simply as that. She tries to make this an issue all the time.

Hillary follow the rules and if you win you win if you lose you lose. The rest is not important. She has been with the Democratic Party long enough to know this. So what she is doing is misleading by stating all the others when she knows its the delegates that manner. And I think the SD's will go with the person that has followed the rules and has the most delegates at the end of this in June. They will not go against the people's vote if they want to win this election in November.

These polls that they take regarding Hillary's people not voting for Obama or Obama's people not voting for Hillary is stupid. The only way this would come into play is if the SD's give this to Clinton if Obama is in the lead at the end. I don't think this will happen they can not be that stupid.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2008, 07:13 AM
 
1,126 posts, read 2,609,333 times
Reputation: 572
why don't vote again in both states?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2008, 07:14 AM
 
Location: Albemarle, NC
7,730 posts, read 13,683,155 times
Reputation: 1509
Hillary will fight tooth and nail to have Florida added to her delegates while splitting the MI delegates evenly.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2008, 07:14 AM
j33
 
4,626 posts, read 13,680,936 times
Reputation: 1719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasdrubal View Post
why don't vote again in both states?
That was suggested, but both states rejected it due to the cost of funding a new election.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2008, 07:17 AM
 
69,366 posts, read 61,792,619 times
Reputation: 9382
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Doesnt matter.. Popular vote does not elect the president.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2008, 07:27 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
2,662 posts, read 3,697,307 times
Reputation: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Hope. Hope they go away. It's amazing to see this change we can believe in translated into disenfranchising the voters of two states.

But this is one reason Hillary's stayed in. Will the supers vote based on the popular vote of the country -- which Hillary is currently winning.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2008, 07:37 AM
j33
 
4,626 posts, read 13,680,936 times
Reputation: 1719
Quote:
Originally Posted by LNTT_Vacationer View Post
Hope. Hope they go away. It's amazing to see this change we can believe in translated into disenfranchising the voters of two states.

.
What on earth are you talking about? The states and the party, and the candidates agreed on this course of action, and are now clucking on about it like it was a surprise.

That either candidate is now suddenly deciding that what they agreed to is now no longer the case is disingenuous. Is it not? If not, I'd be curious to hear your argument as to why not. What you presented above what not an argument as to why not.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top