Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-18-2020, 11:17 AM
 
10,758 posts, read 4,346,172 times
Reputation: 5826

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dspguy View Post
Clinton had more paths to victory but she neglected those mid-western states. Trump won the 2016 election on 300,000 votes in his favor out of 27,000,000 votes cast in FL, NC, MI, WI, NC and earned all 90 of those Electoral Votes. That's a tiny margin of 1.1% in those states. A win is a win and the rest is history.

Whether you like CNN or not, there are many pollsters out there that have nothing to do with CNN. While I think it is too early to draw conclusions from polls for an event that is more than 5 months away, there is a consensus across polls in Biden's favor. Sure, maybe one poll here and there has Trump up by 1 and the rest of Biden up by 3,4 or 5.

If come October, the polls have Biden up by 6 or more nationally and up by 4 or more in most of those battleground states, I think it should be the end of hearing about how "wrong the polls are."
2016 proved the state polls are too unreliable (even the day before the election, let alone in May LMAO), for example Hillary led Wisconsin by 6.5 in November according to RealClearPolitics, and Trump won Wisconsin!

Hillary's RCP average lead in the national poll was 7.1 on October 18th, and I don't believe Biden will even be leading the national poll by October 18th, because right now he's completely protected in the basement and he's still only managing a 4.5 lead (and that was 6.3 on April 29th!), so I'd be surprised if Biden is even leading by July....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-18-2020, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Cape Cod
24,490 posts, read 17,232,699 times
Reputation: 35784
I think we should all have learned by now not to trust polls but what is shocking about this one is that CNN didn't bury it seeing that their guy came out on the bottom.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2020, 01:24 PM
 
5,938 posts, read 4,699,219 times
Reputation: 4631
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAGAalot View Post
2016 proved the state polls are too unreliable (even the day before the election, let alone in May LMAO), for example Hillary led Wisconsin by 6.5 in November according to RealClearPolitics, and Trump won Wisconsin!

Hillary's RCP average lead in the national poll was 7.1 on October 18th, and I don't believe Biden will even be leading the national poll by October 18th, because right now he's completely protected in the basement and he's still only managing a 4.5 lead (and that was 6.3 on April 29th!), so I'd be surprised if Biden is even leading by July....
No, it doesn't prove state polls are unreliable. Most polls were close to the actual result. It is simply harder to forecast something that is a near 50/50 chance vs the chances of the Harlem Globetrotters defeating the Washington Genreals.

I provided a list earlier of 4 polls - not even cherry picked (well, the Wisconsin one was). Most polls are right - the actual result winds up with a vote margin within the margin of error. CA, FL and NH were just picked out of thin-air. I had to go out of the way to find one not within the margin of error.

Just because there's a few polls that are "wrong" doesn't mean the entire concept of polls are wrong.

If you got a bad cup of coffee at McDonald's would you never go there again? Well maybe :P But it doesn't mean every cup of coffee at McDonald's, Starbucks, Dunkin Donuts is bad. If they were ALL bad, those businesses wouldn't exist. And neither would polls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2020, 01:28 PM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,294,358 times
Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrie22 View Post
...Hillary did

but this is a CNN poll....CNN that flat out lies and makes up news....CNN that can't even get the names of states right
CNN doesn’t conduct their own polls. They contract with established polling firms as do other networks like ABC, CBS, Fox News and NBC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2020, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,872 posts, read 9,536,978 times
Reputation: 15590
Is this thread now going to be the designated thread for all Trump-Biden polls?
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
There seems to be a myth among the Trumpies that if only polls of likely voters were counted, Trump would be trouncing Biden. For example, this:

Unfortunately for them, that's simply not true.

This month so far we have the following. Note that these are polls of likely, not registered, voters:

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com...eral/national/

May 14: Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus - 728 LV - Biden +9
May 11: Redfield & Wilton Strategies - 1,500 LV - Biden +8
May 7: Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus - 758 LV - Biden +7
May 6: Change Research - 1,489 LV - Biden +3
May 4: Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus - 765 LV - Biden +4
May 3: YouGov - 1,671 LV - Biden +6
----------------------------------------------------
Average for May: Biden +6.16%

Since the beginning of this month, there is not a single nationwide poll of likely voters that shows Trump ahead. And in the results so far, Biden has generally been extending his lead as the month has progressed.
Anyway, a new one out today ...

May 18: Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus - 780 LV - Biden +10
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2020, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,897,671 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by dspguy View Post
No, it doesn't prove state polls are unreliable. Most polls were close to the actual result. It is simply harder to forecast something that is a near 50/50 chance vs the chances of the Harlem Globetrotters defeating the Washington Genreals.

I provided a list earlier of 4 polls - not even cherry picked (well, the Wisconsin one was). Most polls are right - the actual result winds up with a vote margin within the margin of error. CA, FL and NH were just picked out of thin-air. I had to go out of the way to find one not within the margin of error.

Just because there's a few polls that are "wrong" doesn't mean the entire concept of polls are wrong.

If you got a bad cup of coffee at McDonald's would you never go there again? Well maybe :P But it doesn't mean every cup of coffee at McDonald's, Starbucks, Dunkin Donuts is bad. If they were ALL bad, those businesses wouldn't exist. And neither would polls.
Not Starbucks is bad when they don't have a Christmas cup...

Any polls that don't support whomever is their preferred candidate is wrong. That is why I try to go with aggregate data than individual polls. For states that isn't as easy to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2020, 02:14 PM
 
5,938 posts, read 4,699,219 times
Reputation: 4631
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
Not Starbucks is bad when they don't have a Christmas cup...

Any polls that don't support whomever is their preferred candidate is wrong. That is why I try to go with aggregate data than individual polls. For states that isn't as easy to do.
A site that does a great job with polls is 538. They examine the history of a particular pollster and the bias they have (this can be measured against actual election results). And as long as they continue polling using that methodology, they can have a reasonable idea of how biased that poll is.

The polls they generally ignore are candidates' internal polling. Those are generally a waste of time.

While I'm not down on RCP, I feel like they just average all the polls together - regardless of whether that pollster is historically accurate or whether they used 100 voters or 2000 voters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2020, 03:52 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,872 posts, read 9,536,978 times
Reputation: 15590
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
Is this thread now going to be the designated thread for all Trump-Biden polls?

Anyway, a new one out today ...

May 18: Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus - 780 LV - Biden +10
And another:

Harris Poll: 1,708 LV - Biden +6

Last edited by James Bond 007; 05-18-2020 at 04:13 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2020, 04:42 PM
 
38 posts, read 13,625 times
Reputation: 32
Polls are always "correct", of course.

Let me tell you: Democrats are done for 2020, not a chance. Battleground states aren't like deluded coastal big cities...people in them are seeing right through this non-epidemic flu BS now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2020, 04:48 PM
 
21,932 posts, read 9,503,108 times
Reputation: 19456
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach43ofus View Post
This poll was taken before Joe lied about not knowing about the Flynn railroad.

Now all Americans know Joe commited Treason, 7 was part of a Coup D'etat. That will cause a lot of moderate Dems & Independents to stay home.

Joe's enthusiasm rate was 28% BEFORE being involved in Treason....crimes against the state. What might it be now? 18%?
It will still be 28%. 28% of the people in this country would vote for Charles Manson if he were the Democrat nominee.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top