Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Lawsuit filed yesterday 11-24 by group Amistad Project in Wisconsin Supreme Court.
read lawsuit here: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-c...Petition-1.pdf
or search 'Amistad Project Wisconsin lawsuit'
affects over 150,000 'votes'.
I read it - it details some MAJOR election fraud in Wisconsin, including evidence of certain(big D) cites illegally accepting millions$$ to implement unauthorized election procedures, in violation of Michigan state election laws = fraud!
Why would Wisconsin care about Michigan's election laws?
Sorry to break your heart but indefinitely confined is self certified with no definition.
Estimates do not count. Only hard proof will be accepted. This like every other lawsuit will be dismissed. I don't even the conservatives on the state supreme court will be willing to throw away all those votes without good evidence. All of them voted early in person, so you will need a very good reason for them to throw away their own vote.
Why would Wisconsin care about Michigan's election laws?
Sorry to break your heart but indefinitely confined is self certified with no definition.
Estimates do not count. Only hard proof will be accepted. This like every other lawsuit will be dismissed. I don't even the conservatives on the state supreme court will be willing to throw away all those votes without good evidence. All of them voted early in person, so you will need a very good reason for them to throw away their own vote.
Looks to me that the document refers to Wisconsin.
Another lawsuit that will go nowhere. Fail, fail and fail again seems to me the Trump MO. It's absurd. And even if this suit was won, which is doubtful (a federal court had previously rejected the claim that Mark Zuckerberg with his millions given through one of his foundations had "illegally circumvented Wisconsin's absentee voter laws," which is at the heart of this suit--yes, it's that crazy) and the court voided thousands of the Wisconsin ballots and the choice of “presidential electors†reverted to the Republican-dominated state legislature (a lot of "ands" and "ifs" here), Trump would still not win the election (Wisconsin has only 10 electoral votes, and he needs considerably more than that).
The suit is simply a variation on a theme that has already been rejected in a previous court.
Last edited by Moving415; 11-25-2020 at 01:17 PM..
Not necessarily "obvious". Trump's crack legal team did confuse counties in Michigan and Minnesota recently.
That's why they're paid the big bucks.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
