Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-07-2008, 06:50 PM
 
Location: Sugar Land, TX
437 posts, read 631,332 times
Reputation: 73

Advertisements

Now that I have your attention, who should Obama pick as his running mate?

Last edited by da jammer; 05-07-2008 at 08:10 PM.. Reason: DM sent
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-07-2008, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Hilltop
100 posts, read 442,668 times
Reputation: 52
John Edwards
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2008, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,657 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239
Hillary Clinton would be my first choice. A united front would be awesome.

Kathleen Sebelius, Governor of Kansas, would be my second choice. She's a strong woman that could energize Hillary supporters reluctant to support Obama.

Bill Richardson, Governor of New Mexico, would be my third choice. He can help Obama with a group that has largely eluded him, Latinos.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2008, 07:04 PM
 
Location: Sugar Land, TX
437 posts, read 631,332 times
Reputation: 73
An Obama/Sebelius ticket would be my absolute dream. My husband teases me about Sebelius, reminding me that I was once this excited about Hillary.

I never realized until today that Richardson and Sebelius were nearly the same age. I was just about to beg Obama to throw us poor Boomer women a bone because Richardson has plenty of time...and then I saw that he's older than she is!

I knew that race would be an issue in this campaign (despite the HillBillies braying otherwise), but I hate that it's become such a central issue. Richardson versus Sebelius is basically Latinos versus white women. I think Barack can regain a large number of women back with Sebelius on the ticket; not just because she's a woman, but because she is a CAPABLE woman who is more than capable of being Commander-in-Chief. And unfortunately, there are far more white women for Barack to need support from than Latinos. I don't think Obama will lose more Latinos if he doesn't pick Richardson; I think his percentage with them will just stay consistently low. Whereas I can see million of Hillary voters stomping over to McCain because that big ol' meanie Obama had the NERVE to beat her in a primary campaign. That'll show us!

Regardless of who gets picked, I think they should make a pact that whoever becomes the VP will take the other candidate when s/he runs for president. So if Obama takes Richardson, and in 4-8 years Richardson runs for president, he should take Sebelius. If Obama takes Sebelius and Sebelius runs in 4-8 years, she should take Richardson. That way, we get them all in office and give them all (long) shots at the being POTUS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2008, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
2,014 posts, read 3,897,919 times
Reputation: 1725
Hands down Hillary, we need to unite the party .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2008, 07:16 PM
 
Location: Pinellas County, Florida
123 posts, read 346,809 times
Reputation: 29
Tell me more about ? Sebelius, who is she. I agree that Richardson may want to be the #2 guy but somehow I don't think he could get the vote out, AND he alignes himself w/the NRA which I hate. What about Hillary being VP. It could work unless they hate each other so much. I hope McCain chooses someone we all could dislike ( like Dem traitor Joe Liebernman ) . Personally I would like Edwards to come back on board but doubt that would happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2008, 07:18 PM
 
Location: Moose Jaw, in between the Moose's butt and nose.
5,152 posts, read 8,526,495 times
Reputation: 2038
Bryon Dorgan, North Dakota Senator.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2008, 07:18 PM
 
4,183 posts, read 6,523,345 times
Reputation: 1734
I like Mark Warner, former governor of Virginia. He is a southerner, a moderate, and has lots of executive experience. Another possibility is Evan Bayh. I also like Sebelius.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2008, 07:19 PM
 
Location: Washington state
7,211 posts, read 9,430,319 times
Reputation: 1895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chefkey View Post
Hands down Hillary, we need to unite the party .
Hillary's negatives are too high. Sebelius, Webb or Clark.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2008, 07:20 PM
 
58 posts, read 92,923 times
Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraKGrisgby View Post
An Obama/Sebelius ticket would be my absolute dream. My husband teases me about Sebelius, reminding me that I was once this excited about Hillary.

I never realized until today that Richardson and Sebelius were nearly the same age. I was just about to beg Obama to throw us poor Boomer women a bone because Richardson has plenty of time...and then I saw that he's older than she is!

I knew that race would be an issue in this campaign (despite the HillBillies braying otherwise), but I hate that it's become such a central issue. Richardson versus Sebelius is basically Latinos versus white women. I think Barack can regain a large number of women back with Sebelius on the ticket; not just because she's a woman, but because she is a CAPABLE woman who is more than capable of being Commander-in-Chief. And unfortunately, there are far more white women for Barack to need support from than Latinos. I don't think Obama will lose more Latinos if he doesn't pick Richardson; I think his percentage with them will just stay consistently low. Whereas I can see million of Hillary voters stomping over to McCain because that big ol' meanie Obama had the NERVE to beat her in a primary campaign. That'll show us!

Regardless of who gets picked, I think they should make a pact that whoever becomes the VP will take the other candidate when s/he runs for president. So if Obama takes Richardson, and in 4-8 years Richardson runs for president, he should take Sebelius. If Obama takes Sebelius and Sebelius runs in 4-8 years, she should take Richardson. That way, we get them all in office and give them all (long) shots at the being POTUS.

She would be a good choice. He could get the southern and midwest vote with her.
If he picks Hillary I may have to vote for McCain. I am tired of the Clintons and Bushes. The country needs new blood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top