Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Boy you leftists really live in a fantasy world, as there is no such thing as a national popular vote.
As to voter fraud, maybe you would care to explain why former president Carter (D) and James Baker listed X amount of issues that allow voter fraud in 3rd world countries, yet the Democrats want such things here in America?
Even Mitch McConnell has admitted that there is no evidence of systemic voter fraud.
There is a national popular vote. It is the cumulative total of all votes for a candidate in a Presidential Election, and the Republican nominee has failed to receive the most votes 87.7% of the time in the last 30 years.
Now is an election determined by the national popular vote? No, but it clearly documents that among the nation’s voters, Republicans are very much a minority.
Last edited by Bureaucat; 08-25-2022 at 03:53 PM..
You are out of your mind, as even someone who has bias against black people would vote the lesser of two evils, whether they were on the left or right.
Walker might not be a great candidate, but he is certainly better than the leftist radical Warnock, who will vote for the radical left ideology for the next 6 years.
Walker might not be a great candidate, talk about understatement.
Boy you leftists really live in a fantasy world, as there is no such thing as a national popular vote.
As to voter fraud, maybe you would care to explain why former president Carter (D) and James Baker listed X amount of issues that allow voter fraud in 3rd world countries, yet the Democrats want such things here in America?
There is a national popular vote. It is the cumulative total of all votes for a candidate in a Presidential Election, and the Republican nominee has failed to receive the most votes 87.7% of the time in the last 30 years.
Now is an election determined by the national popular vote? No, but it clearly documents that among the nation’s voters, Republicans are very much a minority.
I don't recall the state of Georgia providing much investigatory analysis into the most flagrantly suspicious activities of the 'election' such as Ruby Freeman and her daughter's escapades in the middle of the night in the ballot counting room. Something about the Secretary of State, same guy who received 'donations' from Zuckerburg prior during that year and had line crossers from the Democrats recently help him clench the GOP nomination, dismissing it as part of the electoral process was the justification along with the fact they were suing some of the news outlets which portrayed them in a critical light; as if counteractive litigation alone is somehow proof positive of their innocence.
I don't believe election official Mariska Bodison's assertions of chain of custody documentation absence was ever addressed either. No doubt just another peculiar coincidence, though. Oddities heaped onto more oddities with little in the way of full clarification or clarification that isn't mired by what seems to be venality.
On the matter of popular vote, I can't say I have much confidence in the polls. Democrats seemingly manage to poll favourably ahead of Republicans on the national level. What is the insinuation of Democrats seemingly polling ahead no matter what the state of affairs may be even under their watch? The majority of American voters are so unabashedly in favour of the Democrats or opposed to the GOP that it doesn't matter how bad things get they'll always win in the popularity contest? If that's the case then the South Africa comparisons are very much appropriate.
I don't recall the state of Georgia providing much investigatory analysis into the most flagrantly suspicious activities of the 'election' such as Ruby Freeman and her daughter's escapades in the middle of the night in the ballot counting room. Something about the Secretary of State, same guy who received 'donations' from Zuckerburg prior during that year and had line crossers from the Democrats recently help him clench the GOP nomination, dismissing it as part of the electoral process was the justification along with the fact they were suing some of the news outlets which portrayed them in a critical light; as if counteractive litigation alone is somehow proof positive of their innocence.
I don't believe election official Mariska Bodison's assertions of chain of custody documentation absence was ever addressed either. No doubt just another peculiar coincidence, though. Oddities heaped onto more oddities with little in the way of full clarification or clarification that isn't mired by what seems to be venality.
On the matter of popular vote, I can't say I have much confidence in the polls. Democrats seemingly manage to poll favourably ahead of Republicans on the national level. What is the insinuation of Democrats seemingly polling ahead no matter what the state of affairs may be even under their watch? The majority of American voters are so unabashedly in favour of the Democrats or opposed to the GOP that it doesn't matter how bad things get they'll always win in the popularity contest? If that's the case then the South Africa comparisons are very much appropriate.
If issues weren’t addressed in a court of law it’s because they legally did not have merit, not because of some globalist or deep state plot.
The Republicans haven’t been the majority party within the total population for a very long time. Many of their policies just aren’t that popular.
I don't recall the state of Georgia providing much investigatory analysis into the most flagrantly suspicious activities of the 'election' such as Ruby Freeman and her daughter's escapades in the middle of the night in the ballot counting room. Something about the Secretary of State, same guy who received 'donations' from Zuckerburg prior during that year and had line crossers from the Democrats recently help him clench the GOP nomination, dismissing it as part of the electoral process was the justification along with the fact they were suing some of the news outlets which portrayed them in a critical light; as if counteractive litigation alone is somehow proof positive of their innocence.
I don't believe election official Mariska Bodison's assertions of chain of custody documentation absence was ever addressed either. No doubt just another peculiar coincidence, though. Oddities heaped onto more oddities with little in the way of full clarification or clarification that isn't mired by what seems to be venality.
On the matter of popular vote, I can't say I have much confidence in the polls. Democrats seemingly manage to poll favourably ahead of Republicans on the national level. What is the insinuation of Democrats seemingly polling ahead no matter what the state of affairs may be even under their watch? The majority of American voters are so unabashedly in favour of the Democrats or opposed to the GOP that it doesn't matter how bad things get they'll always win in the popularity contest? If that's the case then the South Africa comparisons are very much appropriate.
The claims of Ruby Freeman and her daughter bringing in suitcases of ballots has already been debunked over and over, Giuliani has never apologized to those two for his lies.
If issues weren’t addressed in a court of law it’s because they legally did not have merit, not because of some globalist or deep state plot.
The Republicans haven’t been the majority party within the total population for a very long time. Many of their policies just aren’t that popular.
You make it sound as though impartial pursuance of the truth was a universal objective of all the relevant people. If it were then debacles such as this January 6th 'committee' wouldn't be limiting the scope of their investigation to just rioters and Trump while hand waving facilitators of the incident that day.
A very long time, you say? You mean going back all the way to the 1930s during the time of the Roosevelt? When looking back over the historic party affiliations of Americans you've had more individuals identify with Democrats than Republicans even while in the midst of historic downturns such as Carter era. It's only in specific years such as 1995 that the Republicans were narrowly identified with larger affiliation.
I don't see how much of the current platform for the Democrats is supposed to resonate with voters or positively benefit their lives. A pursuance of ineffective and self-defeating 'green energy' is only driving up the cost of energy and by extension cost in goods and serves due to the interconnectedness of the sectors. The social agenda they push seems to be making an effort to insert CRT curriculum and transgenderism even to the youngest in the educational system. A continual failed interventionist policy in other countries which the Republicans are guilty of but Democrat politicians have expressed support for.
Can anyone imagining Walker actually co-authoring or even debating legislation? I don't think Walker has provided any genuine evidence that he'd be a good senator, in the sense of being able to make good legislation. I think his only merit, from the perspective of Republicans, is that he'd vote with the party.
Last edited by GABESTA535; 08-30-2022 at 09:23 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
