Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Not this R woman and many more like me that I know.
We also do not appreciate that it is now a state issue as the state of FL as well as many other states will use that to violated womens' rights.
an R woman that was ok with the courts making up law in 1973 and big government that is mad that it went to the states like they should have done in 1973. You must be a Rockefeller Republican.
an R woman that was ok with the courts making up law in 1973 and big government that is mad that it went to the states like they should have done in 1973. You must be a Rockefeller Republican.
The court didn't make up law in 1973. They declared a TX law unconstitutional.
The states have proven over and over again they are incapable of effectively governing when it comes to fundamental human rights.
Kavanaugh's opinion in Dobbs says it is up to the states OR feds. What kind of Republican are you calling him?
The court didn't make up law in 1973. They declared a TX law unconstitutional.
Yes they did. Abortion is not mention in the U.S. constitution. They violated the 10th amendment.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Yes they did. Abortion is not mention in the U.S. constitution. They violated the 10th amendment.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
9th amendment; 14 amendment. Lots of words not in the Constitution.
Textual interpretation of the Constitution which basically amounts to sounding out the words like a kindergartener while disregarding the overarching context of the entire document is the height of stupidity.
Don't we all have a right to decide what's best for our bodies. Or do you think our bodies should be controlled by government taking away our choices and forcing their personal beliefs on us.
9th amendment; 14 amendment. Lots of words not in the Constitution.
Textual interpretation of the Constitution which basically amounts to sounding out the words like a kindergartener while disregarding the overarching context of the entire document is the height of stupidity.
However, its really not the topic of this thread.
You open the can of worms about Roe, which is the #1 issue for you in all your posts. Why don't you make up more law and say eating food is a constitutional right.
Don't we all have a right to decide what's best for our bodies. Or do you think our bodies should be controlled by government taking away our choices and forcing their personal beliefs on us.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
