Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Is anyone with me on this? Is it possible to come to a bipartisan agreement that neither should be running? Or is our judgement and thirst for our team to be in power disabling our brains?
If Fetterman wins, will Democrats still deny the existence of election fraud?
Is election fraud going to be the permanent security blanket of the GOP to help them cope with any loss? If your man can't beat a vegetable it must be cheating? He should win overwhelmingly even if cheating was or is involved. Why the "if"? They won't cheat either way? This is becoming such a stupid and annoying narrative.
I don't want Fetterman to win at all. However if Oz can't hand him his own head it is Oz who is the failure. This shouldn't even be a close enough contest to cheat in anyway.
Early voting critical to a flawed candidate and pre debates. the reason early voting must be restricted to a week before the election, with very limited exceptions.
slight of hand political strategy by dems crosses over to unethical.
the debate was a last ditch attempt by dems to get a sympathy vote for fetterman and hope that Oz would live up to the dems claim that Oz was a bully and mocked fetterman's medical condition.
No reason to have that one and only debate that close to the election. No other goal than to trip up oz and get sympathy for fetterman in a race which all claim with be of a razor thin margin. Dems just need a few sympathy votes to win.
Useless debate, after at least 1 million votes had already been cast.
See, no fraud, no rigged election, just strategically tipped to favor fetterman and a host of flawed dem candidates. Plus, we have the media covering for fetterman, as if they were actively engaged in his campaign.
The fact that 24% of the respondents said that Fetterman won speaks volumes about their critical thinking skills.
Fetterman's performance was the stuff of PR team nightmares, as it came off as a mix of Tourette's and tequila.
Pushing the debate to the late date was definitely an intentional attempt to help Fetterman.
All I can think is that some people will say Fetterman was right on the issues. I don't feel that way but it's a bit like the aborti9n issue. You can debate all day and your side is always right no matter how poorly sp9ken the argument is.
I doubt those 24% even watched the debate, well at least for the hope of humanity.
Even if they did watch, it wouldn't tell us anything we don't already know about democrats. We all know "yellow dog democrats" are no myth or urban legend.
The radical uber leftists who couldn't care less if Fetterman could speak, or not.
The only care about themselves, and their radical agenda...America comes in a distant second.
These radicals HATE America, & want to destroy it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
