Should America follow the lead of: Kentucky, West Virginia and Puerto Rico? (vote, campaign)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Seems like the good citizens of Kentucky, West Virginia and Puerto Rico have figured it out. Why shouldn't the Super Delgates follow their lead and nominate Hillary. It is all about what works in America and those states can lead us to what works yesterday, today and tomorrow.
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,766,887 times
Reputation: 3587
Why would America want to follow the lead of some racist backwards back woods state that doesn't even matter to the country? And Puerto Rico cannot even vote in November so nobody cares about them,
Hmmmm not according to Hillary and her team. They are holding these states out as proof of what America needs. Thank you for your post, hopefully the Super Delegates will read it and ignore those returns as not being trend setting.
Seems like the good citizens of Kentucky, West Virginia and Puerto Rico have figured it out. Why shouldn't the Super Delgates follow their lead and nominate Hillary. It is all about what works in America and those states can lead us to what works yesterday, today and tomorrow.
Woot
Hillary
Maybe because the Super Delegates can see through phony tears and lies. Hillary has contradicted herself more times than OJ Simpson has made an A.. of himself. If chosen as the candidate, there will be so much dirt on Hillary Clinton that the republicans will bury her in the first month of the general election campaigning.
Why would America want to follow the lead of some racist backwards back woods state that doesn't even matter to the country? And Puerto Rico cannot even vote in November so nobody cares about them,
you are entitled to your opinion, perhaps some super delegates will read it and concur.
Hmmmm not according to Hillary and her team. They are holding these states out as proof of what America needs. Thank you for your post, hopefully the Super Delegates will read it and ignore those returns as not being trend setting.
I think you mean that more people have actually cast their vote for her than him. It also has to do with they have been able to vote after the country has learned more about Obama.
As for KevK get a reality check get out more. Most of the people in these states don't live in the back woods. Sorry not everyone agrees with the coasts.
Hmmm seems to me we should be due for a new Obama gets blown out thread celebrating the wisdom of Puerto Rico. You know the headings in here. We had them after Kentucky and West Virginia so those posters must think those states have tremendous merit that should be emulated.
Hmmm seems to me we should be due for a new Obama gets blown out thread celebrating the wisdom of Puerto Rico. You know the headings in here. We had them after Kentucky and West Virginia so those posters must think those states have tremendous merit that should be emulated.
Did you miss the whole point of they voted after we learned more about him?
I missed your answer to the OP question which is do you believe:
A.America should follow their lead.
B. America should not follow their lead
C. You are passing on the question
D. None of the above you want to change the focus of the thread to make a point
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.