Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Should we be in Iraq for 100 years?...and how do you think McSame would vote in this poll?...ohh, he'd probably change his vote once every three hours, just like he does everything else YouTube - John McCain vs. John McCain
Should we be in Iraq for 100 years?...and how do you think McSame would vote in this poll?...ohh, he'd probably change his vote once every three hours, just like he does everything else YouTube - John McCain vs. John McCain
Grampie McSame first said 100 years, then it was 50 years and then he said maybe 4 years for troop withdrawal. Now he is saying that setting a "withdrawal date" is not that important. OKAY FLIP FLOPPER or another senior moment. You decide!
Grampie McSame first said 100 years, then it was 50 years and then he said maybe 4 years for troop withdrawal. Now he is saying that setting a "withdrawal date" is not that important. OKAY FLIP FLOPPER or another senior moment. You decide!
Maybe he thought someone would reference Japan and Korea.
But that would take an audience with a three-digit IQ.
Japan and Korea are two examples of the government wasting money. Both nations are more than capable of defending themselves and do not need us wasting time and money on them. McSame wants to repeat the same old mistakes of the past...for crying out loud, we still have several bases in western Europe that serve no purpose but to defend the west from the Soviet Union, ABOUT TWENTY YEARS AFTER THE USSR WENT BUY-BUY!
That is not fiscal responsibility, that is not smaller government, that is the same old same old.
Japan and Korea are two examples of the government wasting money. Both nations are more than capable of defending themselves and do not need us wasting time and money on them. McSame wants to repeat the same old mistakes of the past...for crying out loud, we still have several bases in western Europe that serve no purpose but to defend the west from the Soviet Union, ABOUT TWENTY YEARS AFTER THE USSR WENT BUY-BUY!
That is not fiscal responsibility, that is not smaller government, that is the same old same old.
I served at one of those bases in Europe, talk about a waste of money. Totally useless base with no purpose in it at all. Thankfully they axed it in the last round of base closings.
I served at one of those bases in Europe, talk about a waste of money. Totally useless base with no purpose in it at all. Thankfully they axed it in the last round of base closings.
One down, several more to go.
You get a rep for that one, soldier!
I had a friend who was stationed in Deutschland, and he said it was like a working-vacation with ****-poor accomidations. He, and no one he served with, could understand what they, in 1998, where doing in Europe keeping an eye on a long dead Soviet Union.
Maybe he thought someone would reference Japan and Korea.
But that would take an audience with a three-digit IQ.
Because we need to deplete our treasury for troops in Japan just incase the rising sun wishes to rise again? What's another nation under occupation among friends?
Then again, I must be the 137 IQ outlier record.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
FLIP FLOPPER or another senior moment. You decide!
