U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-01-2008, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Chicago
509 posts, read 682,311 times
Reputation: 59

Advertisements

McCain has shown he can work across the isle, on many occasions.
This may not be one he is very proud of.
I would say this makes the Obama Rezco issue a draw.

Keating Five - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Keating Five were five United States Senators accused of corruption in 1989, igniting a major political scandal as part of the larger Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980s and early 1990s. The five senators, Alan Cranston (D-CA), Dennis DeConcini (D-AZ), John Glenn (D-OH), John McCain (R-AZ), Donald W. Riegle (D-MI), were accused of improperly aiding Charles H. Keating, Jr., chairman of the failed Lincoln Savings and Loan Association, which was the target of an investigation by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB).



In 1989, the Lincoln Savings and Loan Association of Irvine, Calif., collapsed. Lincoln's chairman, Charles Keating, was faulted for the thrift's failure. Keating, however, told the House Banking Committee that the FHLBB and its former chief Edwin J. Gray were pursuing a vendetta against him.
Gray testified that several U.S. senators had approached him and requested that he ease off on the Lincoln investigation. It came out that these senators had been beneficiaries of $300,000 (collective total) in campaign contributions from Keating. McCain received $112,000 by 1987 from Keating and Keating's relatives and employees to McCain's Senate campaign, more than any of the other Senators. [1] In September 1987 National Thrift News was the first media outlet to break the story.[2] In October 1989 The Arizona Republic reported that in addition to campaign contributions, McCain's wife and her father had invested $359,100 in a Keating shopping center in April 1986, a year before McCain met with the regulators. The paper also reported that the McCains, sometimes accompanied by their daughter and baby-sitter, had made at least nine trips at Keating's expense, sometimes aboard the American Continental Corporation (parent of Lincoln) jet. Three of the trips were made during vacations to Keating's opulent Bahamas retreat at Cat Cay. McCain also did not pay Keating for some of the trips until years after they were taken, after he learned that Keating was in trouble over Lincoln. [3] Lincoln Savings and Loan's collapse is said to have cost taxpayers $3.4 billion [4].
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-01-2008, 12:56 PM
 
31,625 posts, read 40,485,033 times
Reputation: 14258
Nah this is old very old, McCain will give ya some new ones to work with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2008, 01:04 PM
 
34,995 posts, read 38,652,070 times
Reputation: 6191
Well, no evidence was found against him to put him in the slams. He just got reprimanded. "don't do teh crooky tings anymorz k k"

Fun reading:
Betrayal, deceit, corruption and John McCain
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2008, 01:08 PM
 
3,566 posts, read 3,683,330 times
Reputation: 1364
Quote:
Originally Posted by LJS8510 View Post
McCain has shown he can work across the isle, on many occasions.
This may not be one he is very proud of.
I would say this makes the Obama Rezco issue a draw.

Keating Five - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Keating Five were five United States Senators accused of corruption in 1989, igniting a major political scandal as part of the larger Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980s and early 1990s. The five senators, Alan Cranston (D-CA), Dennis DeConcini (D-AZ), John Glenn (D-OH), John McCain (R-AZ), Donald W. Riegle (D-MI), were accused of improperly aiding Charles H. Keating, Jr., chairman of the failed Lincoln Savings and Loan Association, which was the target of an investigation by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB).



In 1989, the Lincoln Savings and Loan Association of Irvine, Calif., collapsed. Lincoln's chairman, Charles Keating, was faulted for the thrift's failure. Keating, however, told the House Banking Committee that the FHLBB and its former chief Edwin J. Gray were pursuing a vendetta against him.
Gray testified that several U.S. senators had approached him and requested that he ease off on the Lincoln investigation. It came out that these senators had been beneficiaries of $300,000 (collective total) in campaign contributions from Keating. McCain received $112,000 by 1987 from Keating and Keating's relatives and employees to McCain's Senate campaign, more than any of the other Senators. [1] In September 1987 National Thrift News was the first media outlet to break the story.[2] In October 1989 The Arizona Republic reported that in addition to campaign contributions, McCain's wife and her father had invested $359,100 in a Keating shopping center in April 1986, a year before McCain met with the regulators. The paper also reported that the McCains, sometimes accompanied by their daughter and baby-sitter, had made at least nine trips at Keating's expense, sometimes aboard the American Continental Corporation (parent of Lincoln) jet. Three of the trips were made during vacations to Keating's opulent Bahamas retreat at Cat Cay. McCain also did not pay Keating for some of the trips until years after they were taken, after he learned that Keating was in trouble over Lincoln. [3] Lincoln Savings and Loan's collapse is said to have cost taxpayers $3.4 billion [4].
You'll notice that there was only one Republican in that list. There's a reason for that. The Democrats wanted to make the scandal bipartisan so they included John McCain. The lead investigator for the Democrats, Robert Bennett (Bill Bennett's brother and a powerhouse Democrat lawyer) advised the committee to drop McCain from the investigation because there was no evidence to implicate him. The Dems refused because then the scandal would have revealed the "culture of corruption" to be entirely a feature of the Democrat party. Bennett recently reaffirmed those events. McCain has nothing to fear from the so-called Keating Five scandal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2008, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Washington state
7,208 posts, read 9,305,905 times
Reputation: 1895
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimMe View Post
You'll notice that there was only one Republican in that list. There's a reason for that. The Democrats wanted to make the scandal bipartisan so they included John McCain. The lead investigator for the Democrats, Robert Bennett (Bill Bennett's brother and a powerhouse Democrat lawyer) advised the committee to drop McCain from the investigation because there was no evidence to implicate him. The Dems refused because then the scandal would have revealed the "culture of corruption" to be entirely a feature of the Democrat party. Bennett recently reaffirmed those events. McCain has nothing to fear from the so-called Keating Five scandal.
The fact remains:

Quote:
McCain received $112,000 by 1987 from Keating and Keating's relatives and employees to McCain's Senate campaign, more than any of the other Senators.
For someone so innocent that's interesting to say the least.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2008, 01:16 PM
 
34,995 posts, read 38,652,070 times
Reputation: 6191
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimMe View Post
You'll notice that there was only one Republican in that list. There's a reason for that. The Democrats wanted to make the scandal bipartisan so they included John McCain. The lead investigator for the Democrats, Robert Bennett (Bill Bennett's brother and a powerhouse Democrat lawyer) advised the committee to drop McCain from the investigation because there was no evidence to implicate him. The Dems refused because then the scandal would have revealed the "culture of corruption" to be entirely a feature of the Democrat party. Bennett recently reaffirmed those events. McCain has nothing to fear from the so-called Keating Five scandal.
That's interesting, I never noticed they were all Ds. Wow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2008, 01:19 PM
 
34,995 posts, read 38,652,070 times
Reputation: 6191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upton View Post
The fact remains:

For someone so innocent that's interesting to say the least.
That's hugely interesting! Maybe.... he was paid to play his role...and... (blinded by all the money from the best selling novel, must stop typing)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top