Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Whatever happened, McCain gave "stump speech" answers, pretty much empty. Obama on the other hand was thoughtful and tried to give in-depth answers, even when he knew his honest answers were not going to be popular with most of the audience.
BTW...Keith Olbermann is talking about this on MSNBC right now...turn it on!
Some of Obama's answers didn't even make sense, never mind popularity.
ABC? Olberman? are these really trusted sources for news?
Vickilynn - funny you should say you found McCain scary. That's exactly my gut reaction listening to Obama. He's the candidate of change, all right. He's constantly changing.
As for the abortion issue, how can you trust a man to lead the country when he states that it's OK to kill a baby that survives an abortion, but answers the question of when is a baby entitled to human rights by saying, basically, he doesn't know...(ah, that's a deep question...it's above my pay grade..." Senator Obama, might that be at 6 months? might it be at 2 years? Maybe when he/she starts preschool? And this doesn't scare people? The man doesn't know WHAT he thinks, and votes however the mood strikes him at the moment, as he did on the Illinois bill dealing with this issue.
Poor bots. It's basically a concensus that obama the most generous messiah did not perform up to expectations.
So McCain got to church at 5:20 and was put in the cone. How many questions other than the two they were given, which were asked at the top of the interview could McCain have heard. Would it matter? Would his answers be different?
Most reasonable people seem to not have a problem and definitely believe McCain would not cheat.
Somebody quick! Find out if they have tv's in the Secret Service motorcade vehicles.
Poor bots. It's basically a concensus that obama the most generous messiah did not perform up to expectations.
So McCain got to church at 5:20 and was put in the cone. How many questions other than the two they were given, which were asked at the top of the interview could McCain have heard. Would it matter? Would his answers be different?
Most reasonable people seem to not have a problem and definitely believe McCain would not cheat.
Somebody quick! Find out if they have tv's in the Secret Service motorcade vehicles.
More blasphemy in a forum based on faith. Messiah wow blasphemy.
Wait perhaps you are trying to add Obama to this site and are saying his followers are doomed to Hell? http://www.falsemessiahs.com/
Whatever happened, McCain gave "stump speech" answers, pretty much empty. Obama on the other hand was thoughtful and tried to give in-depth answers, even when he knew his honest answers were not going to be popular with most of the audience.
BTW...Keith Olbermann is talking about this on MSNBC right now...turn it on!
I listen to both conservative, and liberal talk-show hosts--tv, and radio, to hear both sides, but Keith Olbermann is where I quit. I just can't listen to him. He is just too far left of the most left liberals. He isn't even funny, just vindictive, and bitter sounding to me. Whatever he says, I believe the opposite of.
Oh yeah, McCain didn't hear the broadcast of the event while in his motorcade and heard none of the questions.
The McCain camp has parsed their words on this subject in a way that would make Bill Clinton proud. Hearing is merely one sense - hearing does not exclude reading. Other people were around Mr. McCain at the time, presumably with blackberries/iphones and such. Saying he did not "hear the questions or answers" does not mean the same thing as saying that he had no knowledge of any of the questions or answers given before his appearance.
John McCain could lay this to rest very easily with a definitive statement as to what he knew before going into that event, but he hasn't. Why not?
The McCain camp has parsed their words on this subject in a way that would make Bill Clinton proud. Hearing is merely one sense - hearing does not exclude reading. Other people were around Mr. McCain at the time, presumably with blackberries/iphones and such. Saying he did not "hear the questions or answers" does not mean the same thing as saying that he had no knowledge of any of the questions or answers given before his appearance.
John McCain could lay this to rest very easily with a definitive statement as to what he knew before going into that event, but he hasn't. Why not?
Senator McCain could have avoided all of this by simply saying "sorry I'm late", when he hit the stage.
The McCain camp has parsed their words on this subject in a way that would make Bill Clinton proud. Hearing is merely one sense - hearing does not exclude reading. Other people were around Mr. McCain at the time, presumably with blackberries/iphones and such. Saying he did not "hear the questions or answers" does not mean the same thing as saying that he had no knowledge of any of the questions or answers given before his appearance.
John McCain could lay this to rest very easily with a definitive statement as to what he knew before going into that event, but he hasn't. Why not?
because Obama supporters won't believe him anyway, unless he says what they WANT to hear, everything will be disbelieved. So, why bother? The original question posed by OP has been answered, but some people still don't hear it.
McCain is the candidate for the thinking, rational, intelligent voter - not those caught in the "blind following the blind" syndrome of messiah Obama who promises to save us from ourselves by letting the government take over for us.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.