Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which Candidate has the best platform to address the needs of the TROOPS returning from Wars?
Senator McCain, clearly has the best policy and plan for the troops overseas. 2 22.22%
Senator Obama, has the best policy to address the needs of our returning troops. 7 77.78%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-02-2008, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,623,334 times
Reputation: 1680

Advertisements

Which Candidate has the best platform to address the needs of the TROOPS returning from Wars?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-02-2008, 02:27 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,999,957 times
Reputation: 4555
Don't know off hand but that pales in comparison as to just getting the troops returning from War to begin with.

Obama would have us out of there sooner than McCain would.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2008, 02:32 PM
 
26,242 posts, read 49,145,261 times
Reputation: 31846
Obama, by a mile.

Read Obama's page to see all the STEPS he plans to take for our vets. Barack Obama | Change We Can Believe In | Veterans

Obama also voted for the new GI bill, which McCain did NOT.

Since the new GI bill passed, the Army has MET it's enlistment goals.

Obama got involved to fix the disgrace at Walter Reed Medical Center, which McCain did NOT.

McCain is a jerk, won't support the troops, though he sure doesn't mind sending them off to war, repeatedly.

If anyone REALLY wants to see just how BADLY our vets are treated, read this: Injured Veterans Fight for Healthcare in Major Lawsuit
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2008, 02:35 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,999,957 times
Reputation: 4555
Also even if McCain had some big plan to help them after they come home would it matter???

He's just dying to send the to Iran to start another war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2008, 03:08 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,208,282 times
Reputation: 21745
Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm View Post
Which Candidate has the best platform to address the needs of the TROOPS returning from Wars?
They volunteered to go there and you want me to throw money at them because it wasn't like the video game?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2008, 03:11 PM
 
Location: Wallace, Idaho
3,352 posts, read 6,670,599 times
Reputation: 3591
Ron Paul.

Oh, wait, the party machinery rejected him.

How about Kucinich?

Oh, never mind. Same deal ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2008, 03:11 PM
 
7,381 posts, read 7,702,857 times
Reputation: 1266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike from back east View Post
Obama, by a mile.

Read Obama's page to see all the STEPS he plans to take for our vets. Barack Obama | Change We Can Believe In | Veterans

Obama also voted for the new GI bill, which McCain did NOT.

Since the new GI bill passed, the Army has MET it's enlistment goals.

Obama got involved to fix the disgrace at Walter Reed Medical Center, which McCain did NOT.

McCain is a jerk, won't support the troops, though he sure doesn't mind sending them off to war, repeatedly.

If anyone REALLY wants to see just how BADLY our vets are treated, read this: Injured Veterans Fight for Healthcare in Major Lawsuit
The new GI bill that was passed will reduce RETENTION, the most important aspect of the new military. I have a son in the Army and he would benefit immensely from the new bill. However, it will reduce the effectiveness of the military by replacing seasoned military with new recruits. Thus, the reason most Reps opposed it. Of course, liberals don't care about the military's effectiveness, only controlling citizens by providing everything for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2008, 03:14 PM
 
Location: Va Beach
3,507 posts, read 13,468,779 times
Reputation: 1034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
They volunteered to go there and you want me to throw money at them because it wasn't like the video game?
This is the problem I have with comments like these. I am a veteran and I do approve this message: Our military should be honored, not made out to be some video game player. They have come home in body bags, they have come home dismembered and wounded for a cause. On Sept 11th, 3,000 innocent lives were lost and over 3,000 military lives were lost. Just because you are sitting home at your computer, doesn't mean they are wasting their time. I would prefer my tax dollars go to our military men and women who are mothers, fathers, sons and daughters than to a person who is too lazy to work, to enhance themselves on a new career, or just because they think it is owed to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2008, 03:16 PM
 
1,535 posts, read 2,065,810 times
Reputation: 455
This is an easy one:


September 2007: McCain voted against the Webb amendment calling for adequate troop rest between deployments. At the time, nearly 65% of people polled in a CNN poll indicted that "things are going either moderately badly or very badly in Iraq.

July 2007: McCain voted against a plan to drawdown troop levels in Iraq. At the time, an ABC poll found that 63% thought the invasion was not worth it, and a CBS News poll found that 72% of respondents wanted troops out within 2 years.

March 2007: McCain was too busy to vote on a bill that would require the start of a drawdown in troop levels within 120 days with a goal of withdrawing nearly all combat troops within one year. Around this time, an NBC News poll found that 55% of respondents indicated that the US goal of achieving victory in Iraq is not possible. This number has not moved significantly since then.

February 2007: For such a strong supporter of the escalation, McCain didn’t even bother to show up and vote against a resolution condemning it. However, at the time a CNN poll found that only 16% of respondents wanted to send more troops to Iraq (that number has since declined to around 10%), while 60% said that some or all should be withdrawn. This number has since gone up to around 70%.

June 2006: McCain voted against a resolution that Bush start withdrawing troops but with no timeline to do so.

May 2006: McCain voted against an amendment that would provide $20 million to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for health care facilities.

April 2006: McCain was one of only 13 Senators to vote against $430,000,000 for the Department of Veteran Affairs for Medical Services for outpatient care and treatment for veterans.

March 2006: McCain voted against increasing Veterans medical services funding by $1.5 billion in FY 2007 to be paid for by closing corporate tax loopholes.

March 2004: McCain once again voted for abusive tax loopholes over veterans when he voted against creating a reserve fund to allow for an increase in Veterans' medical care by $1.8 billion by eliminating abusive tax loopholes. Jeez, McCain really loves those tax loopholes for corporations, since he voted for them over our veterans' needs.

October 2003: McCain voted to table an amendment by Senator Dodd that called for an additional $322,000,000 for safety equipment for United States forces in Iraq and to reduce the amount provided for reconstruction in Iraq by $322,000,000.

April 2003: McCain urged other Senate members to table a vote (which never passed) to provide more than $1 billion for National Guard and Reserve equipment in Iraq related to a shortage of helmets, tents, bullet-proof inserts, and tactical vests.

August 2001: McCain voted against increasing the amount available for medical care for veterans by $650,000,000. To his credit, he also voted against the 2001 Bush tax cuts, which he now supports making permanent, despite the dire financial condition this country is in, and despite the fact that he indicated in 2001 that these tax cuts unfairly benefited the very wealthy at the expense of the middle class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2008, 03:17 PM
 
26,242 posts, read 49,145,261 times
Reputation: 31846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
They volunteered to go there and you want me to throw money at them because it wasn't like the video game?
Typical GOP hatefulness towards our troops, who are also on the GOP YOYO plan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top