Quote:
Originally Posted by ryneone;5439583[FONT=Times New Roman
]Give one reason why she would not be better than her opponent? [/font]
|
1. She sounds really ignorant in her interviews, especially with Katie Couric and Charlie Gibson.
2. She lied about the bridge to nowhere as she supported it until the Gov't pulled the plug
3. She advocates pro life in cases of incest and rape
4. She also advocates 'abstinence only', despite that her teenage daughter is pregnant
5. She thinks Alaska's proximity to Russia makes her a viable VP candidate for dealing with Russia Foreign Policy in and of itself (i.e. see #1)
6. She did not know what the Bush Doctrine was, a very current and relevant ideology that is extremely relevant to this election (i.e. see #1)
7. She thinks that dinosaurs (who were extinct 65 million years ago), cohabited with humans 10,000 years ago (or less). More so, she thinks this (i.e. broader level: creationism) should be taught in U.S. Public Schools
8. She has pending criminal investigations in Alaska and is involved in a corruption probe
9. She wants to handle this nation's economics but earned a 'D' IN Economics
I only have one question for you as well. Do these specific things sit well with you?