Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
no, but the liberals won't do anything to get them off the streets. most panhandlers are drug addicts, not mental cases. let's not forget the the panhandling guitar playing hippie that is allowed to beg on the streets. that really makes for a comfortable experience. reagan? what does he have to do with anything? did I say I was a reagan supporter? hell no! he didn't slash enough federal programs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashrob123
So, the "liberal" brought homelessness. That's a new one. I thought it started with the massive cuts in mental health hospitals that took place during the Regan administration. Gee, all along, we've all been wrong.
I don't need your definition to anything. this was a response to someone who had misused the term "racist." I know exactly what the word means. I have no problem with people voting. I have a problem with agendas. bringing in someone to vote for "your guy." that gets annoying.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashrob123
First of all, racism is more than racial prejudice so let's first use the correct term. The word that you are looking for is bigoted or prejudiced.
So, to rephrase, is it bigoted to vote for a black person just because they are black? Answer no. But it is bigoted to vote against someone because they are black (or white).
Voting for someone because you see it as a good thing isn't bigoted. It is only when you vote against someone that it becomes bad. I'm not voting for McCain because McCain is (in my opinion) the worst choice for a country in peril, not because he's white.
Who would have thought that people would actually be against bring in first time voters in America? Geesh, what are we coming to in this country.
but you claimed that most mixed people called themselves black. I have never heard that from anyone.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashrob123
Your friends do not total to the entire population of mixed black people in this nation. So, what you should have said is the people that I know call themselves mixed race not that all do.
There are entirely too many white racists in America in general, as well as the South and rural parts of America particularly, for Obama to ovecome. Obama is good for America and can get the country out of its current situation; but, although there are many color-blind whites, there are far too many white Americans who cannot see past skin color. Republicans will deny it, and others will refuse to admit it, but it is the sad the truth.
For every racist white I'll raise you a racist black. Dumbo followed one for 20 years and it cost him in spades. Say g'nite Dumbo.
Location: Moose Jaw, in between the Moose's butt and nose.
5,152 posts, read 8,526,069 times
Reputation: 2038
Quote:
Originally Posted by anifani821
Are you in the South? That is a helluva generalization you are making.
Please, you have to be hiding under a rock to know that the South is not the powder keg of black white racism in the US (compared to other parts of the US).
If not, then why was the ad that was used against Harold Ford in 2006 (the almost nude blonde white girl who said "I met Harold at the playboy party!") cost him the election in the race against Crocker (or whoever his GOP opponent was)?
Obama doesn't need the South, except for Virginia, and that's if he doesn't win Colorado.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.