Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-28-2008, 02:51 PM
 
13,721 posts, read 19,251,067 times
Reputation: 16971

Advertisements

Democratic Convention 2008

HILLARY SUPPORTER DEMOCRATS STOLE NOMINATION FROM HILLARY on Technorati

The Green Papers
2008 Presidential Primaries, Caucuses, and Conventions [SIZE=6]Democratic Convention
[/SIZE]
Presidential Nominating Process
Automatic selection of unpledged delegates: Saturday 1 March 2008
Rules and Bylaws Committee Meeting: Saturday 31 May 2008
45th Democratic National Convention: Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August 2008 CandidatePopular
VoteDelegate VotesHard TotalFloor VoteClinton, Hillary Rodham17,857,446 48.04%1,730.5 39.17%341.5 7.73%Obama, Barack Hussein17,584,649 47.31%1,747.5 39.55%1,549.5 35.07%Edwards, John Reid994,022 2.67%32.0 0.72% Uncommitted293,075 0.79%908.0 20.55% Richardson, William B. "Bill", III104,051 0.28% Kucinich, Dennis J.99,962 0.27% Biden, Joseph Robinette "Joe", Jr.79,754 0.21% Gravel, Mike35,303 0.09% Dodd, Christopher J. "Chris"34,663 0.09% No Preference31,255 0.08% Blank, Void, Scattering28,698 0.08% (others)25,871 0.07% Uninstructed861 0.00% Scattering468 0.00% Undecided42 0.00% (available) (not voting) 2,527.0 57.20%Total37,170,120 100.00%4,418.0 100.00%4,418.0 100.00%4,418 total delegate votes - 2,316 district / 794 at large; 456 Pledged PLEOs; 771 Unpledged PLEOs; 81 Unpledged add-ons
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-28-2008, 03:20 PM
 
13,721 posts, read 19,251,067 times
Reputation: 16971
No wonder Bill is out campaigning for McCain. The nomination was Hillary's and the DNC stole it from her. Look at the numbers from thegreenpapers.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2008, 03:25 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
385 posts, read 626,286 times
Reputation: 193
Seriously? How old is this? Republicans were trying to make the claim that Obama stole this from Hillary months ago. Just because you joined CD in August doesn't mean that you get to re-hash old and tired false arguments that you missed out on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2008, 03:26 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,910,188 times
Reputation: 4459
the primaries and the general election should be determined by popular vote and the 3rd party candidate should get equal air time during the presidential debates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2008, 03:29 PM
 
13,721 posts, read 19,251,067 times
Reputation: 16971
Quote:
Originally Posted by boywithstick View Post
Seriously? How old is this? Republicans were trying to make the claim that Obama stole this from Hillary months ago. Just because you joined CD in August doesn't mean that you get to re-hash old and tired false arguments that you missed out on.
You have all of 100 posts. The information is relevant. People are getting ready to vote for someone who has no business being president of the United States. He was NOT vetted properly and he never should have been the nominee to begin with; it was stolen from Hillary. So yes, I am very serious. You want to complain about Palin's vetting? Well here Obama is the potential PRESIDENT - not VP - and he has questionable things in his background that have not been investigated AND he should never have gotten the nomination to begin with. If you don't think this is serious, think again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2008, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Major Metro
1,083 posts, read 2,292,676 times
Reputation: 364
Are you just going to repost thread topics all day today?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2008, 03:31 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,974,480 times
Reputation: 4555
What's the name of this person who should be "vetting" Obama???.....LOL

Spreading kooky conspiracy smears and not knowing the meaning of simple words go hand in hand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2008, 03:32 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
385 posts, read 626,286 times
Reputation: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by luzianne View Post
You have all of 100 posts. The information is relevant. People are getting ready to vote for someone who has no business being president of the United States. He was NOT vetted properly and he never should have been the nominee to begin with; it was stolen from Hillary. So yes, I am very serious. You want to complain about Palin's vetting? Well here Obama is the potential PRESIDENT - not VP - and he has questionable things in his background that have not been investigated AND he should never have gotten the nomination to begin with. If you don't think this is serious, think again.
Quantity does not equal quality. You obviously don't understand what the word vetted means, but that's already being discussed in another thread. Obama was selected by Democrats over Hillary. That's a done deal. Clinton is on board with Obama being president and supports him 100%. Get over it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2008, 03:37 PM
 
Location: Albemarle, NC
7,730 posts, read 14,154,199 times
Reputation: 1520
Quote:
Originally Posted by boywithstick View Post
Quantity does not equal quality. You obviously don't understand what the word vetted means, but that's already being discussed in another thread. Obama was selected by Democrats over Hillary. That's a done deal. Clinton is on board with Obama being president and supports him 100%. Get over it.
Hillary even stopped the count and handed Obama the nomination to try to heal these scars. I don't believe that many of these people will be able to vote for McCain when it comes. If spite is a reason to vote a certain candidate, then I vote for Satan. Some people in this country deserve it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2008, 03:39 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,974,480 times
Reputation: 4555
Maybe "Libby" should have vetted Obama?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top