Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Robert Gibbs dances circles around Sean Hannity who falls into his own morass of hipocracy. Both Robert Gibbs and Sean Hannity gain little ground in this arguement, which shows how pointless the William Ayers arguement really is.
What he failed to note was that Hannity brought this kook on his show as a credible supporter of Hannity's ideology. These other guest Hannity mentioned were brought and treated as hostile witnesses. So Hannity does indeed covort and cooperate with known full blown racists.
Robert Gibbs dances circles around Sean Hannity who falls into his own morass of hipocracy. Both Robert Gibbs and Sean Hannity gain little ground in this arguement, which shows how pointless the William Ayers arguement really is.
Maybe something is wrong with the link. The video I just watched showed Hannity asking a question that was never answered. Instead Gibb throws out some nonsense about a guest on the program who's a Jew hater because he doesn't have and answer for Ayers or Wright. News programs bring on slime rags so that America will see them for what they are. Not answering the question speaks volumes. The fact that McCain has picked up a full percentage point while Obama has lost 0.8% in the last 48 hrs speaks volumes too. Obama has done a very effective job of framing the discussion to what he wants (Pie in the sky pipe dreams vs. Bushes' unpopularity). But now it is getting close to the actual election and America is asking who is this person who wants my vote? ...and why does he have an inner circle that would make Charles Manson wince! Why does he have the #1 most liberal voting record in the Senate? Why did he and the other dems fight GSE oversite measures tooth, nail and filibuster from 2003 to 2008. The rhetoric he keeps spouting off my have run its course because in the end everyone knows McCain and Bush are two different people and Bush isn't running.
Robert Gibbs dances circles around Sean Hannity who falls into his own morass of hipocracy. Both Robert Gibbs and Sean Hannity gain little ground in this arguement, which shows how pointless the William Ayers arguement really is.
Hannity most certainly lost that argument. He needs to calm down and make his point's rationally. I don't agree with all of Obama's associations (circumstantial evidence) but spouting off about one single member of his associations without much serious proof in a irrational way does not help you're cause.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
