Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:02 PM
 
Location: NEPA
43 posts, read 87,634 times
Reputation: 32

Advertisements

I don't see how anybody can still, in today's modern society, see the appeal of the obviously masturbatory process of presidential voting.

There seems to be some ideology and fantastical belief that somehow, our individual vote counts, in any way at all, in swaying the odds to directly affect the outcome. Folks, if you believe this, please do me a favor and pull your head out of your ass.

Eight years ago, George W. Bush was elected as the 43rd president of the United States of America, beating Al Gore and whoever else ran that year (you know, the guys the media doesn't tell you about). How is this possible, considering Gore gathered over 540,000 more popular votes than Bush?

The electoral vote. You know, from the "state-appointed party-affiliated electors" for the US presidential candidate who has won a majority of the popular vote in that state. Bush won the electoral vote 271-266. So, despite a majority of popular votes going to Gore, Bush gets in. And we all know how well that worked out.*

But that wasn't the only instance of popular votes meaning basically nothing. Benjamin Harrison received 233 electoral votes to Grover Cleveland's 168, winning the presidency. But Harrison lost the popular vote by more than 90,000 votes. Before that, Rutherford B. Hayes won the election (by a margin of one electoral vote), but he lost the popular vote by more than 250,000 ballots to Samuel J. Tilden.

And somehow, in 1824, John Quincy Adams lost both the popular vote (by 38,000 votes) AND the electoral vote (99-84). Andrew Jackson was the winner in both categories, but John Quincy Adams was elected president. Figure that one out.

The system is flawed. It always has been.

All this nonsense about electoral votes, electoral college, red states, blue states, winning states, swing states, republican, democrat, green party, left wing, right wing...only exists to complicate the process and create excuses as to why a candidate can gather more overall votes and not win the election.

The next president is already chosen. Whoever the higher-ups want in will get in, regardless of what we want and how we vote. I don't know who will win and I frankly don't give two ****s. Just keep this in mind if you decide to waste precious moments of your life by voting: election day has a higher percentage of traffic accidents AND fatalities resulting from such accidents than any other day.

Exercise your right NOT to vote.

I think the late, great George Carlin said it the best:


YouTube - George Carlin - I Dont Vote



* I'm kind of glad that we didn't end up with a president who believes that human beings are causing the temperature of the Earth to rise. Hey Al, care to explain to me how the Ice Age 10,000 years ago ended, and the 6 before that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:07 PM
 
1,867 posts, read 4,089,944 times
Reputation: 593
Let's just be anarchists too and shun all government!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:12 PM
 
Location: NEPA
43 posts, read 87,634 times
Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by quelinda View Post
Let's just be anarchists too and shun all government!
No, just standard practices, such as voting, that we all know are flawed for the benefit of the government and not for the citizens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:13 PM
 
9,848 posts, read 30,369,845 times
Reputation: 10517
The electoral college isn't perfect, but you failed to suggest an alternative. And please don't say it should just be based on the popular vote as that has even more flaws.

Your vote does count. Go vote!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:16 PM
 
Location: WA
4,242 posts, read 8,800,328 times
Reputation: 2376
If voting is masturbatory, I think I did it wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:18 PM
 
1,302 posts, read 3,315,756 times
Reputation: 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by North_Raleigh_Guy View Post
The electoral college isn't perfect, but you failed to suggest an alternative. And please don't say it should just be based on the popular vote as that has even more flaws.

Your vote does count. Go vote!
Why would a popular vote, for the Presidency, be flawed? Aside from concerns about Mickey Mouse getting elected, etc, I am curious as to your concerns. Seriously. As for other alternatives why not proportional representation of the electoral college based on the popular vote within each state? Much of the Democratic primary was done this way. That way in a Democratic enclave like California Republicans would view their vote as actually mattering on a national level. Open to all polite debate.

JRP
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:27 PM
 
Location: NEPA
43 posts, read 87,634 times
Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by North_Raleigh_Guy View Post
The electoral college isn't perfect, but you failed to suggest an alternative.
I'm simply trying to educate those who believe they live in a perfect world. I'm not a miracle-worker. I know that something is wrong, but most people don't. Maybe someone will come up with something if they actually opened their eyes to reality instead of the media.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jrprofess View Post
Why would a popular vote, for the Presidency, be flawed?
Because it becomes just that: a popularity contest. Plus the fact that Leroy Schmidt from the backwoods of Alabama has, in addition to his three teeth, a couch on his lawn, a wife who's also his sister, and less of an understanding of politics than my dog's chew toys...he has the right to vote.

Do you really want HIS vote to count?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:32 PM
 
1,302 posts, read 3,315,756 times
Reputation: 347
[quote=Falconer84;5985613]I'm simply trying to educate those who believe they live in a perfect world. I'm not a miracle-worker. I know that something is wrong, but most people don't. Maybe someone will come up with something if they actually opened their eyes to reality instead of the media.



Because it becomes just that: a popularity contest. Plus the fact that Leroy Schmidt from the backwoods of Alabama has, in addition to his three teeth, a couch on his lawn, a wife who's also his sister, and less of an understanding of politics than my dog's chew toys...he has the right to vote.

Do you really want HIS vote to count?[/quote]

You can't play that game in a democracy. All votes count, of legal age, or they do not. It would be impossible to determine who's vote should count. I would take your last scenario over an election where the popular vote winner is the loser...why not a proportional electoral vote then?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:32 PM
 
11,135 posts, read 14,235,124 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by Falconer84 View Post
I don't see how anybody can still, in today's modern society, see the appeal of the obviously masturbatory process of presidential voting.

There seems to be some ideology and fantastical belief that somehow, our individual vote counts, in any way at all, in swaying the odds to directly affect the outcome. Folks, if you believe this, please do me a favor and pull your head out of your ass.
I am all in favor of ending our electoral college, especially in this day in age.

However, while I understand where the cynicism arises from in most people folks and there is some truth to it, but it is a self fulfilling prophecy. After all, I wish everyone wouldn't vote except for me.

Imagine if you were a soldier storming the beaches at Normandy and you said to yourself, 'if I ran away it wouldn't matter one bit as to the outcome of this war' and you would be right. However if every soldier thought this then we might all be speaking German. Maybe it is your duty to die, to take a bullet for the guy next to you so that he can kill one of the enemy.

I see this as trying to apply an economic type principle to politics where when you do simple math, no one voter means much but collectively they do. I also think it is a flawed way of looking at things. (unless of course everyone decides not to except for me)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:43 PM
 
Location: NEPA
43 posts, read 87,634 times
Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jrprofess View Post
You can't play that game in a democracy. All votes count, of legal age, or they do not. It would be impossible to determine who's vote should count.
Yet the electoral system decides that only certain votes in certain states count.


Quote:
Originally Posted by TnHilltopper View Post
Imagine if you were a soldier storming the beaches at Normandy and you said to yourself, 'if I ran away it wouldn't matter one bit as to the outcome of this war' and you would be right. However if every soldier thought this then we might all be speaking German. Maybe it is your duty to die, to take a bullet for the guy next to you so that he can kill one of the enemy.
I think this is an unfair comparison when you consider the consequences of not fighting in a war are far greater than not voting.

Nobody has the duty to do anything.

If you want to vote, go for it. Knock yourself out. I just want people to realize that they are not accomplishing much when they do.

People need to open their eyes to the world around them and see how things work, and question them when they don't, instead of accepting everything at face value.

Go back to bed, America. Your government is in control.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top