Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-04-2009, 06:21 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,616,189 times
Reputation: 1680

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tennis702 View Post
There are likely to be three moderate-to-liberal retirements from the Supreme Court during the first term of the Obama administration: John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Experts Predict Supreme Court Retirements and Likely Replacements | ABA Journal - Law News Now

Among these or others, who do you think would be likely replacements:

Jennifer Granholm, Governor of Michigan
Howard Dean, ex-Governor of Vermont
Deval Patrick, Governor of Massachusetts
Hillary Clinton, Senator from New York
Valerie Jarrett, long-time advisor to Barack Obama
Andrew Cuomo, New York Attorney General

hmmm...Maybe 4 if you throw in Scalia....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-04-2009, 06:25 AM
 
Location: Home is where the heart is
15,402 posts, read 28,970,587 times
Reputation: 19090
Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm View Post
hmmm...Maybe 4 if you throw in Scalia....
Now that's a happy thought to start off the week. I hope you're right (but I have a feeling he'll be around until he turns 99... and maybe long after that...)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2009, 07:41 AM
 
4,104 posts, read 5,314,744 times
Reputation: 1256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooperkat View Post
Barack's second Supreme Court appointment will be the one that breaks the camel's back.

This is the first step for Barack. The second step will be of enormous importance to him. He will make the Supreme Court a very liberal legislative body.


Constitutionalists can kiss their butts goodbye.
Ironic that he was a Professor of Constitutional law, don't you think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2009, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,616,189 times
Reputation: 1680
I'm curious,
Which President's are responsible for the "liberal" Supreme Court Justices currently on the Court?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2009, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Home is where the heart is
15,402 posts, read 28,970,587 times
Reputation: 19090
Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm View Post
I'm curious,
Which President's are responsible for the "liberal" Supreme Court Justices currently on the Court?
Most were nominated by republicans.

John G. Roberts (Chief Justice) was nominated by George W. Bush
Souter was nominated by George H.W. Bush (papa bush).
Clarence Thomas was nominated by George H.W. Bush
Samuel Alito was nominated by George W. Bush
John Paul Stevens was nominated by Ford
Antonin Scalia was nominated by Reagan
Anthony Kennedy was nominated by Reagan
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was nominated by Clinton
Stephen Breyer was nominated by Clinton
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2009, 05:31 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,616,189 times
Reputation: 1680
The Republicans sure love their "liberal" Justices.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 12:39 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,406,766 times
Reputation: 18436
That steely-eyed conservative Roberts had a seizure last year. Hopefully this means that his days are numbered. The guy gives me the creeps. Would be great to replace him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 05:24 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,990,690 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Barack's second Supreme Court appointment will be the one that breaks the camel's back.
Not if he is replacing one of the liberals. The ideology make-up would stay the same.

Granted, that person would then be sitting on the court for a while.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 06:38 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,837,665 times
Reputation: 24863
I can only hope for a nominee that understands the role of the Constitution in protecting the individual from coercion by government and corporations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 07:19 AM
 
Location: Houston, TX
1,305 posts, read 3,492,844 times
Reputation: 1190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upton View Post
Me too, Stevens is 88, Ginsburg 75..but Souter? Kennedy, Breyer, and Scalia are all older....man wouldn't it be a bonus if Scalia were to retire.
We can dream.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top