Obama team now vetting Bill Clinton finances (9/11, legal, Democrats)

[Cyber Queen]

Originally Posted by PG77

Well, let's haul Bush into a court of law and prove he is a liar. He lied to the American people and, therefore, has led to loss of life. Bill Clinton was dragged into court over something less relevant to the country and never took one life.

Hell if you can PROVE beyond a doubt that Bush lied I am right there with ya but until them he did not lie. There was undeniable proof that Clinton lied.


The difference here is with Bush it is speculation no hard evidence with Clinton there was hard evidence.

[PG77]

Originally Posted by dcadca

Hell if you can PROVE beyond a doubt that Bush lied I am right there with ya but until them he did not lie. There was undeniable proof that Clinton lied.


The difference here is with Bush it is speculation no hard evidence with Clinton there was hard evidence.

And I own a bridge in London.

[Cyber Queen]

Originally Posted by PG77

And I own a bridge in London.

Oh so I guess DNA is not proof to you. His ADMISSION that he lied is not proof. Ummmm maybe he should have videotaped it for you.

[Luiso]

Originally Posted by tigerlily

RD5050 excellent post. To put in a nutshell: When Clinton lied, no one died.

I agree but he did lie .
What complete lack of discretion of thinking to fool around while President.

The guy I think was in his 50s and he cant control himself ?

The fooling around part is his business the being reckless and stupid made it the countries business.

Again I do agree about "When Clinton lied, no one died"

[Luiso]

Originally Posted by dcadca

Hell if you can PROVE beyond a doubt that Bush lied I am right there with ya but until them he did not lie. There was undeniable proof that Clinton lied.


The difference here is with Bush it is speculation no hard evidence with Clinton there was hard evidence.

Yes with Bill Clinton there was "hard" evidence

[PG77]

Originally Posted by dcadca

Oh so I guess DNA is not proof to you. His ADMISSION that he lied is not proof. Ummmm maybe he should have videotaped it for you.

Look, I am not saying that Clinton didn't lie, OK? I am saying that Bush lied, too. Whether you choose to believe it then that is up to you.

[tigerlily]

Originally Posted by Luiso

I agree but he did lie .


The guy I think was in his 50s and he cant control himself ?

What does age have to do with it?

[Luiso]

Originally Posted by dcadca

Ahhhh ok this is the argument I was trying to make. A lie is a lie the difference between Bush and Clinton is that Clinton was PROVEN by his own words and actions to be a liar, Bush was not.

Putting aside Clintons lie but has to make you think where his head was at that he would make such a bad decision as Pres

[Luiso]

Originally Posted by tigerlily

What does age have to do with it?

He is was in his 50s thats old enough to know better in truth old enough to not have sex anymore.

40 should be the cut off age after that it seems gross

[PG77]

Originally Posted by Luiso

He is was in his 50s thats old enough to know better in truth old enough to not have sex anymore.

40 should be the cut off age after that it seems gross

Are you for real?