Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ooh another liberal making an unfounded accusation and then creating criticizism..
Who claimed he was an effective speaker?
Unlike Democrats, I prefer to research facts, not just vote on someone ability to "speak"..
Ohhh - another mindless, reflexive response against all things liberal..
He did post facts - that you ingored them is not his fault...
He said that Bush scared us into believing that Iraq was obtaining nuclear weapons. and that is a fact...
Bush explicitly warned us over and over that Saddam was working to build nukes. He implicitly warned us that Al Queda would get them by painting a picture of cooperation between Saddam and Al Queda...
Ohhh - don't you just hate those pesky 'facts' that you don't like which shoot down your position - and then you demand that people dig up more facts???
Ohhh - another mindless, reflexive response against all things liberal..
He did post facts - that you ingored them is not his fault...
He said that Bush scared us into believing that Iraq was obtaining nuclear weapons. and that is a fact...
Bush explicitly warned us over and over that Saddam was working to build nukes. He implicitly warned us that Al Queda would get them by painting a picture of cooperation between Saddam and Al Queda...
Ohhh - don't you just hate those pesky 'facts' that you don't like which shoot down your position - and then you demand that people dig up more facts???
.....
Oddly enough, the very same ones you listed were used by Clinton.. Care to try again? Topic is Bush and his ability to speak "effective".. NOTHING you've said even discuss the topic..
Ooh another liberal making an unfounded accusation and then creating criticizism..
Who claimed he was an effective speaker?
Unlike Democrats, I prefer to research facts, not just vote on someone ability to "speak"..
Are you kidding me with this post? Asking the president of the greatest country to be an effective speaker is now all of sudden asking to much? I mean grant it this minor requirement was probably a huge challenge for bush but sheeesh some of your rhetoric is simply asinine.
I would suggest that there were two Bushes, the Bush of 2000 spoke in terms of a populist moderate conservative, a likable guy, from a likable family. His views were conservative but the skewed to the middle and were coached in a style that were straight forward and seemingly with out averse.
The George Bush of 2004, was a fear mongering, swaggering, No Nothing who played on the fears of a still traumatized nation.
Are you kidding me with this post? Asking the president of the greatest country to be an effective speaker is now all of sudden asking to much? I mean grant it this minor requirement was probably a huge challenge for bush but sheeesh some of your rhetoric is simply asinine.
Not what I said, but the irony in Democrats ONLY voting for someone because of their effective speaking isnt lost..
Maybe thats what seperates Democrats from Republicans, Demcrats want people to be able to listen to the speakers tone of their voice, Republicans want to hear whats actually being said..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hit the nail on the head here..
