When Democrats lose seats in the house and senate, who/what will they blame? (house seat, unemployment)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In their heart of hearts they will probably blame George Bush. IMO they'll think GWB created an impossible situation that a clueless ideologue like Obama couldn't possibly fix, and when he couldn't walk on water like he promised everyone, the voters turned their backs on the Democrats.
In their heart of hearts they will probably blame George Bush. IMO they'll think GWB created an impossible situation that a clueless ideologue like Obama couldn't possibly fix, and when he couldn't walk on water like he promised everyone, the voters turned their backs on the Democrats.
"Since World War II, the president's party has lost House seats in 14 of 16 midterm elections with an average loss of 23 seats""
Of course this is a fact that most wingers have no clue about. They think if Dems lose around this amount of seats or less, it's all about them.....LOL
How many threads started by right wingers that have no clue about the subject they post about????
What will be their response?
1) Err well I knew this I was just testing you.
2) 23 seat average loss? I don't believe it....Hannity would have told me if it were true!
3) I don't respond to "liberul's facts"......they're "shrill".
4) Padcrasher you and your "fancy book lernin" are not welcome here! Now Git!
Last edited by padcrasher; 05-16-2010 at 11:27 PM..
Mods, please close this thread, the OP is trying to flame.
Maybe I can use this one for all the race baiting and teabagger threads from the left.
The Dems will use every excuse above to blame their losses on. Remember anything else would mean taking personal responsibility and they will have none of that!
Who/what will the Democrats blame in November when they lose most of their power to do anything?
Oh God, NO....here we go again.
My guess: "We inherited this mess from GW so no matter what......it wasn't our fault......it was Bush's fault."
It will ALWAYS be Bush's fault since BO can do NO wrong!
It doesn't matter if its 20 years from now........and if they got to keep their messiah in the Oval office for 2 terms and unemployment had gone to 12%, the war still dragging on in Afghaniland...AND with NO economic recovery truly happening whatsoever.
It would still be Bush's fault!
Mods, please close this thread, the OP is trying to flame.
LOL, now that's classic!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
