Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Europe
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-14-2014, 10:43 AM
 
9,229 posts, read 9,763,680 times
Reputation: 3316

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by erasure View Post
Something like that, but in OP's case it's the other way around I guess; first he has to distort ( to blur) the general picture, and that's how "romantic hero" shows up in it; hence - no particular thoughts of "devil's business."
Are you a 10 year-old pupil or something? Devil?

Rommel, for example, refused to persecute Jewish soldiers despite the order. He also refused to execute captured British. He was forced to commit suicide by Hitler.

You don't seem to have any passion or knowledge of history, but keep talking like a naughty teenager. Do you know you look funny in other people's eyes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2014, 01:00 PM
 
1,600 posts, read 1,890,147 times
Reputation: 2066
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bettafish View Post
There is evidence. Controversial, of course.
Soviet offensive plans controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Soviet offensive plans controversy refers to the debate among historians on the question of whether Soviet Dictator Joseph Stalin was planning to invade Germany prior to Operation Barbarossa.
As Glantz pointed out, there are no proofs whatsoever that Stalin accepted Zhukov Plan which called for an attack on 6th July 1941.
Plus, all the thesis is based on Suvorov's thesis which has been widely disproved: Suvorov said the Red Army had an offensive stance and deployment when Barbarossa started out, it's false.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 01:38 PM
 
9,229 posts, read 9,763,680 times
Reputation: 3316
Quote:
Originally Posted by xander.XVII View Post
As Glantz pointed out, there are no proofs whatsoever that Stalin accepted Zhukov Plan which called for an attack on 6th July 1941.
Plus, all the thesis is based on Suvorov's thesis which has been widely disproved: Suvorov said the Red Army had an offensive stance and deployment when Barbarossa started out, it's false.
Well, since it was not something that really happened, we can only talk about speculations.
People can have very different opinions on what to believe and what not to believe.

IMO the Soviets did want to expand whenever there was a chance. Not necessarily because they want to rule other nations, but it was a character of communism at that time. They wanted to unify the world and build a new world, which they believed is good. Even China "exported revolutions" to neighboring countries after 1949.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 02:34 PM
 
26,789 posts, read 22,567,030 times
Reputation: 10040
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bettafish View Post
Are you a 10 year-old pupil or something? Devil?

Rommel, for example, refused to persecute Jewish soldiers despite the order. He also refused to execute captured British. He was forced to commit suicide by Hitler.

You don't seem to have any passion or knowledge of history, but keep talking like a naughty teenager. Do you know you look funny in other people's eyes?
Hon, it's called "metaphor" and I, being a 10 year old pupil know it, while you, being a 12 years old apparently don't.
(The rest still stands. )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 03:14 PM
 
26,789 posts, read 22,567,030 times
Reputation: 10040
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bettafish View Post
Well, since it was not something that really happened, we can only talk about speculations.
People can have very different opinions on what to believe and what not to believe.

IMO the Soviets did want to expand whenever there was a chance. Not necessarily because they want to rule other nations, but it was a character of communism at that time. They wanted to unify the world and build a new world, which they believed is good. Even China "exported revolutions" to neighboring countries after 1949.
Why am I not surprised to hear all that?
These were the ideas of early Bolsheviks in Russia, circa 1917-1924.
But already by 1926 the decision of "building the socialism in one country" has been made during the XIV conference of the Russian Communist party; the biggest proponent of this idea was Stalin himself, and from that point on that's where all efforts have been concentrated.
So nope, sorry - no plans for "expansion" for the Russians at that historic period; the opposite is nothing but a hearsay.
Overall when it comes to Russia vs Europe in terms of invasions, think about it in these terms; Russia is a huge country, sparsely populated, rich in natural resources and disorganized and mismanaged for the most part. Europe - is quite the opposite. So really, there is no need/ motivation for Russians to go and conquer Europe, while Europe can benefit a lot while conquering Russia. It's that simple.

Last edited by erasure; 02-14-2014 at 03:36 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 04:14 PM
 
9,229 posts, read 9,763,680 times
Reputation: 3316
Quote:
Originally Posted by erasure View Post
Why am I not surprised to hear all that?
These were the ideas of early Bolsheviks in Russia, circa 1917-1924.
But already by 1926 the decision of "building the socialism in one country" has been made during the XIV conference of the Russian Communist party; the biggest proponent of this idea was Stalin himself, and from that point on that's where all efforts have been concentrated.
So nope, sorry - no plans for "expansion" for the Russians at that historic period; the opposite is nothing but a hearsay.
Overall when it comes to Russia vs Europe in terms of invasions, think about it in these terms; Russia is a huge country, sparsely populated, rich in natural resources and disorganized and mismanaged for the most part. Europe - is quite the opposite. So really, there is no need/ motivation for Russians to go and conquer Europe, while Europe can benefit a lot while conquering Russia. It's that simple.
I already posted the wiki link. You can read it and draw your own conclusions.
The communism ideology was just one factor among many factors, there were also military/strategic considerations, etc.

As I said people believe what they want to believe and I never seen anyone convince another on internet either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 04:59 PM
 
90 posts, read 94,272 times
Reputation: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bettafish View Post
There is evidence. Controversial, of course.
Soviet offensive plans controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Soviet offensive plans controversy refers to the debate among historians on the question of whether Soviet Dictator Joseph Stalin was planning to invade Germany prior to Operation Barbarossa.
It is naive to ignore Poland because they were "quickly" (lasted longer than France who had larger military and more time to prepare) defeated by 4 invading nations (Germany, USSR, Slovakia and Prussia)

But Russia was still years away from a theoretical invasion of Germany/Central Europe because they knew Poland stood in the way. And let's remember what happened last time

Polish-Soviet War 1919-1921

According to American sociologist Alexander Gella "the Polish victory had gained twenty years of independence not only for Poland, but at least for an entire central part of Europe
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 05:22 PM
 
1,600 posts, read 1,890,147 times
Reputation: 2066
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bettafish View Post
Well, since it was not something that really happened, we can only talk about speculations.
People can have very different opinions on what to believe and what not to believe.

IMO the Soviets did want to expand whenever there was a chance. Not necessarily because they want to rule other nations, but it was a character of communism at that time. They wanted to unify the world and build a new world, which they believed is good. Even China "exported revolutions" to neighboring countries after 1949.
No doubt that USSR would've invaded, especially if Germany stuck up in the mud in the West.
Yet, there's no proof whatsoever that USSR was about to invade Germany just prior to Barbarossa.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 05:42 PM
 
Location: Finland
24,128 posts, read 24,821,814 times
Reputation: 11103
One reason for the Soviet offensive theory might be that Stalin didn't think Hitler would attack, the defenses were ill-prepared, and on the other hand Stalin didn't want to provoke Hitler, so the troops were just sitting there.
The Russian communications were broken down immediately after the initial attack, a very bad sign for a possible offensive.

If the Soviet Union would've plan an attack, it should've put all top-of-the-line equipment, like the new T-34, at the front lines, but they weren't. The VVS flew initially mainly old planes, and had only 39 (!) Mig-1 fighters available on 22 June, and around 200 IL-2 Sturmoviks!

No, the Soviet Union was definitely not planning an offensive being so ill prepared.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 06:11 PM
 
9,229 posts, read 9,763,680 times
Reputation: 3316
Quote:
Originally Posted by xander.XVII View Post
No doubt that USSR would've invaded, especially if Germany stuck up in the mud in the West.
Yet, there's no proof whatsoever that USSR was about to invade Germany just prior to Barbarossa.
The Barbarossa operation was certainly well before Stalin's attack plan, if there was any. No doubt the Soviets were not prepared.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Europe

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top