Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Europe
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-26-2016, 11:10 PM
 
Location: Russia
5,786 posts, read 4,239,218 times
Reputation: 1742

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
If "murderous tyrant" were a Wikipedia entry, Putin would probably be the accompanying picture.
Wiki? Oh, yea, this is the serious argument. Especially when everyone can write there whatever you want.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
He is indeed murderous, and responsible for deaths of tens of thousands
What do you mean?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-28-2016, 06:44 AM
 
Location: Ubique
4,320 posts, read 4,209,783 times
Reputation: 2822
Quote:
Originally Posted by serabal View Post
You don't undestand one simple thing. If Russia would wanted to invade Baltic States or Ukraine, they would be Russian territory in a short time. We don't need them.
That's sour grapes, because you can't have them. That would be suicidal for Russia. US / NATO / EU would be all over you, destabilize and demolish Russia economically.


Quote:
Originally Posted by serabal View Post
Russians believe in the power of soul and they believe in something more great than a man could be.
I don't know if 150 million Russians think like you, but highly doubt it. I want to believe though that many Russians are civilized, and think that man (or woman) is the sovereign.

I think some of them understand Enlightment, that we all are born with liberty and individuality to think for ourselves, not subdue our spirit to the lords or the collective, and that man (not religion or a cult) is at the top of the pyramid. I believe that there are Russian who reject group-think and servitude to the state or collective, or that "greater-than-man" tyrannical slogans.

You just might not be amongst them.


Quote:
Originally Posted by botticelli View Post
Murderous tyrants or not, it really matters to those who care. I guess it is fine for the US to murder countless civilians overseas with its drones - well as long as it is democratically decided, guess there is no murderous tyrant, just a murderous country.
I do not apologize. That's the cost of war. Do not attack me and my family, then go an hide under a woman's skirt. If you can't come out on the open and fight me like a man, then unfortunately I have to come and obliterate you in every hole, cave, rock you hide under.

These are the same cockroaches who blow up their own women and children, and then crying foul.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2016, 12:04 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,348,051 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry10 View Post
I do not apologize. That's the cost of war. Do not attack me and my family, then go an hide under a woman's skirt. If you can't come out on the open and fight me like a man, then unfortunately I have to come and obliterate you in every hole, cave, rock you hide under.

These are the same cockroaches who blow up their own women and children, and then crying foul.
And, of course, it's the typical Kremlin propaganda of "blame the U.S."

The U.S. is not engaged in these military activities. That's a 100% Kremlin lie. The world community is involved in these military activities. Obviously the U.S. is the leading actor, because the U.S. military is better funded than the rest of the world's defense forces combined. Very few countries even have serious military drone technology.

But it isn't a unilateral U.S. action; it's only occurring because the world community has agreed that fighting ISIS, Al Quaeda is a worthwhile endeavor. Of course, Putin seeks to aid ISIS by meddling in Syria and supporting Assad, but that's another story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2016, 12:11 PM
 
5,214 posts, read 4,025,201 times
Reputation: 3468
Here Putin calls out Romania/Poland. I'm happy Bulgaria at least didn't agree with NATO(nazi anglo turkish organization) and hasn't joined the polish/roma kurvi, while just saying it "considers the option":

Putin says Romania, Poland may now be in Russia's cross-hairs | Reuters
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2016, 12:28 PM
 
26,789 posts, read 22,567,030 times
Reputation: 10040
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry10 View Post
That's sour grapes, because you can't have them. That would be suicidal for Russia. US / NATO / EU would be all over you, destabilize and demolish Russia economically.
There is no "sour grapes" for Russia ( although some "die hard" imperial-minded Russians might feel this way.) Russia really doesn't need Baltic countries too much for geopolitical purposes. We are in the age of nuclear weapons - the need for buffer states in Scandinavian direction is not big. And as for access to the Baltic sea - Russia already has it.
As for "demolishing" Russia - may I remind again that we live in the age of nuclear weapons?


Quote:
I do not apologize. That's the cost of war. Do not attack me and my family, then go an hide under a woman's skirt. If you can't come out on the open and fight me like a man, then unfortunately I have to come and obliterate you in every hole, cave, rock you hide under.

These are the same cockroaches who blow up their own women and children, and then crying foul.
Huh? No, that would be more appropriate to be told by Russians actually - "do not attack me and my family," not Americans so much. Yet you see a lot of complaints here, when it comes to "the cost of war." And a lot of demands for Russians to apologize.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2016, 12:38 PM
 
26,789 posts, read 22,567,030 times
Reputation: 10040
P.S. Oh, and regarding this -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry10 View Post
I don't know if 150 million Russians think like you, but highly doubt it. I want to believe though that many Russians are civilized, and think that man (or woman) is the sovereign.

I think some of them understand Enlightment, that we all are born with liberty and individuality to think for ourselves, not subdue our spirit to the lords or the collective, and that man (not religion or a cult) is at the top of the pyramid. I believe that there are Russian who reject group-think and servitude to the state or collective, or that "greater-than-man" tyrannical slogans.

You just might not be amongst them.
This is what I have to say - of course Russians are different - they have different opinions, but judging by the gist of your post here, I'd say great Russian writer M. Bulgakov already addressed people like you in his "The Master and Margarita" book once and for all)))

(From "The Master and Margarita," Chapter I "Never talk to strangers.")

****
"May I join you?" enquired the foreigner politely, and as the two friends moved somewhat unwillingly aside he adroitly placed himself between them and at once joined the conversation. "If I am not mistaken, you were saying that Jesus never existed, were you not?" he asked, turning his green left eye on Berlioz. "No, you were not mistaken," replied Berlioz courteously. "I did indeed say that."
"Ah, how interesting!" exclaimed the foreigner.
"What the hell does he want?" thought Bezdomny and frowned.
"And do you agree with your friend?" enquired the unknown man, turning to Bezdomny on his right.
"A hundred per cent!" affirmed the poet, who loved to use pretentious numerical expressions.
"Astounding!" cried their unbidden companion. Glancing furtively round and lowering his voice he said: "Forgive me for being so rude, but am I right in thinking that you do not believe in God either?" He gave a horrified look and said: "I swear not to tell anyone!"
"Yes, neither of us believes in God," answered Berlioz with a faint smile at this foreign tourist's apprehension. "But we can talk about it with absolute freedom."
The foreigner leaned against the backrest of the bench and asked, in a voice positively squeaking with curiosity:
"Are you... atheists?"
"Yes, we're atheists," replied Berlioz, smiling, and Bezdomny thought angrily: "Trying to pick an argument, damn foreigner!"
"Oh, how delightful!" exclaimed the astonishing foreigner and swiveled his head from side to side, staring at each of them in turn.
"In our country there's nothing surprising about atheism," said Berlioz with diplomatic politeness. "Most of us have long ago and quite consciously given up believing in all those fairy-tales about God."
At this the foreigner did an extraordinary thing — he stood up and shook the astonished editor by the hand, saying as he did so:
"Allow me to thank you with all my heart!"
"What are you thanking him for?" asked Bezdomny, blinking.
"For some very valuable information, which as a traveller I find extremely interesting," said the eccentric foreigner raising his forefinger meaningfully.
This valuable piece of information had obviously made a powerful impression on the traveller, as he gave a frightened glance at the houses as though afraid of seeing an atheist at every window.
"No, he's not an Englishman," thought Berlioz. Bezdomny thought: "What I'd like to know is — where did he manage to pick up such good Russian?" and frowned again.
"But might I enquire," began the visitor from abroad after some worried reflection, "how you account for the proofs of the existence of God, of which there are, as you know, five?"
"Alas!" replied Berlioz regretfully. "Not one of these proofs is valid, and mankind has long since relegated them to the archives. You must agree that rationally there can be no proof of the existence of God."
"Bravo!" exclaimed the stranger. "Bravo! You have exactly repeated the views of the immortal Emmanuel on that subject. But here's the oddity of it: he completely demolished all five proofs and then, as though to deride his own efforts, he formulated a sixth proof of his own."
"Kant's proof," objected the learned editor with a thin smile, "is also unconvincing. Not for nothing did Schiller say that Kant's reasoning on this question would only satisfy slaves, and Strauss simply laughed at his proof."
As Berlioz spoke he thought to himself: "But who on earth is he? And how does he speak such good Russian?"
"Kant ought to be arrested and given three years in Solovki asylum for that 'proof' of his!" Ivan Nikolayich burst out completely unexpectedly.
"Ivan!" whispered Berlioz, embarrassed.
But the suggestion to pack Kant off to an asylum not only did not surprise the stranger but actually delighted him
"Exactly, exactly!" he cried and his green left eye, turned on Berlioz glittered. "That's exactly the place for him! I said to him myself that morning at breakfast: 'If you'll forgive me, professor, your theory is no good. It may be clever but it's horribly incomprehensible. People will think you're mad.'"
Berlioz's eyes bulged. "At breakfast... to Kant? What is he rambling about?" he thought.
"But," went on the foreigner, unperturbed by Berlioz's amazement and turning to the poet, "sending him to Solovki is out of the question, because for over a hundred years now he has been somewhere far away from Solovki and I assure you that it is totally impossible to bring him back."
"What a pity!" said the impetuous poet.
"It is a pity," agreed the unknown man with a glint in his eye, and went on: "But this is the question that disturbs me — if there is no God, then who, one wonders, rules the life of man and keeps the world in order?"
"Man rules himself," said Bezdomny angrily in answer to such an obviously absurd question.
"I beg your pardon," retorted the stranger quietly, "but to rule one must have a precise plan worked out for some reasonable period ahead. Allow me to enquire how man can control his own affairs when he is not only incapable of compiling a plan for some laughably short term, such as, say, a thousand years, but cannot even predict what will happen to him tomorrow?"
"In fact," here the stranger turned to Berlioz, "imagine what would happen if you, for instance, were to start organizing others and yourself, and you developed a taste for it — then suddenly you got... he, he... a slight heart attack..." at this the foreigner smiled sweetly, as though the thought of a heart attack gave him pleasure..." Yes, a heart attack," he repeated the word sonorously, grinning like a cat, "and that's the end of you as an organizer! No one's fate except your own interests you any longer. Your relations start lying to you. Sensing that something is amiss you rush to a specialist, then to a charlatan, and even perhaps to a fortune-teller. Each of them is as useless as the other, as you know perfectly well. And it all ends in tragedy: the man who thought he was in charge is suddenly reduced to lying prone and motionless in a wooden box and his fellow men, realizing that there is no more sense to be had of him, incinerate him.
"Sometimes it can be even worse: a man decides to go to Kislovodsk," — here the stranger stared at Berlioz — "a trivial matter you may think, but he cannot because for no good reason he suddenly jumps up and falls under a tram! You're not going to tell me that he arranged to do that himself? Wouldn't it be nearer the truth to say that someone quite different was directing his fate?" The stranger gave an eerie peal of laughter.
Berlioz had been following the unpleasant story about the heart attack and the tram with great attention and some uncomfortable thoughts had begun to worry him. "He's not a foreigner... he's not a foreigner," he thought, "he's a very peculiar character... but I ask you, who is he?.."

Needless to say this was written back in Stalin's times ))))
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2016, 02:17 PM
 
26,789 posts, read 22,567,030 times
Reputation: 10040
Link to the previous quote from Bulgakov's book.

Never Talk to Strangers (Fiction Extracts at Davar Web Site)

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2016, 02:31 PM
 
26,789 posts, read 22,567,030 times
Reputation: 10040
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
And, of course, it's the typical Kremlin propaganda of "blame the U.S."
It depends. Kremlin doesn't always like to blame the US, because SOME in Kremlin were willing collaborators with Clintons, participating hand in hand in crimes of the 90ies.

Quote:
The U.S. is not engaged in these military activities. That's a 100% Kremlin lie. The world community is involved in these military activities. Obviously the U.S. is the leading actor,



Quote:
But it isn't a unilateral U.S. action; it's only occurring because the world community has agreed that fighting ISIS, Al Quaeda is a worthwhile endeavor.
You've got it all wrong NOLA, with your usual delusions in your head. US is NOT fighting Al-Qaeda - it's siding with it, as it sided with radical Islam in Afghanistan in the 80ies))))

You need at least read articles in "respectful Western Media" from time to time that you like to refer to so much)))


"Washington's refusal to jointly fight al-Qaida's branch in Syria has contributed to an escalation of fighting in the war-torn country, Russia's Defense Ministry said Friday.
The Russians proposed last week that Russia and the U.S.-led anti-Islamic State coalition launch joint action against the Nusra Front, but the U.S. military said its contacts with Russia are only to maintain airspace safety in the crowded skies over Syria."


Russia Deplores US Refusal to Jointly Fight Nusra in Syria - ABC News



Quote:
Of course, Putin seeks to aid ISIS by meddling in Syria and supporting Assad, but that's another story.
Putin already "aided ISIS" in Palmira.
Where were the US troops to cleanse this ancient city from Islamic bozos I'd like to know?
And where was the "world community" I'm asking you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2016, 04:08 PM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,387,876 times
Reputation: 1387
Serbia (with Macedonia and Montenegro), then Belarus and then perhaps Bulgaria i think are the most pro-Russian, the others are pro-American. Ukraine, i still think is split in that respect albeit mostly pro-American.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2016, 04:54 PM
 
Location: Ubique
4,320 posts, read 4,209,783 times
Reputation: 2822
Quote:
Originally Posted by erasure View Post
Link to the previous quote from Bulgakov's book.

Never Talk to Strangers (Fiction Extracts at Davar Web Site)

I did read the whole thing you posted and even linked to, but I find your response strange and incomprehensible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Europe

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top