Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Is it that the first ones are just a bit bigger, as in have more body fat than the second group? or is it their inherent build/ bone structure? Could someone with a body type like the first group ever be able to achieve the narrow torso and waistline like those in the second?
I have wide hips and pelvis, hipbones and ribs that are spaced far apart, and a very short waist that just goes in and out sharply rather than a smooth curve; and I was always jealous of girls with those super narrow torsos. Is it a matter of getting super lean and toned? Or just not going to happen no matter what?
No bashing please, I know it's a minor thing and only health matters blah blah, just curious
Other than the last gal in group #2 (who looks too thin IMO), there really isnt that much of a difference except for overall "hotness" which the girls in the first two pics of group #2 seem to have more of than group #1. The darker skinned girl in group #2 is beautiful. The others are just "meh". Most seem to be the "B" team as far as Victoria's Secret models go. Click on the link that takes you to the lingere pages instead of the swimsuit pages and you'll see women who look healthier and sexier.
Other than the last gal in group #2 (who looks too thin IMO), there really isnt that much of a difference except for overall "hotness" which the girls in the first two pics of group #2 seem to have more of than group #1. The darker skinned girl in group #2 is beautiful. The others are just "meh". Most seem to be the "B" team as far as Victoria's Secret models go. Click on the link that takes you to the lingere pages instead of the swimsuit pages and you'll see women who look healthier and sexier.
What I was referring to is the waist/ midsection/ love handle area, which also seems to relate to pelvis width. The girls in the first group look noticeably 'thicker' through the midsection, with what looks like slight love handles, even though you can see they're very fit and by definition as models I'm sure are in fantastic shape. Which is why I'm wondering how much of it is just build and genetics, or is it fat..
Looks like the women in the second group have longer torsos and possibly lower body fat. The women in the first group have the high hip bone/shorter torso thing going on, which can make the waistline appear thicker.
Looks like the women in the second group have longer torsos and possibly lower body fat. The women in the first group have the high hip bone/shorter torso thing going on, which can make the waistline appear thicker.
I was thinking something along these lines. The 2nd group seem to have thinner structure above the waist break, almost straight lined.
And just on my preference, which is really what judging looks is about, the first group appear healthier, for lack of a better word.
Post more pics. There's not enough info yet for me to give you an educated opinion.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
