Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wilson, I have a question for you. I once read that a study had been conducted, and they found that large breasted women were more intelligent and had higher IQs than smaller breasted women. In your experience, would you say this is true?
I'd say it's *******s, since I've known both small and large breasted women who have been either really dumb or really intelligent, and I never correlated breast size with that. But that's just me.
That has to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard of. How could large breasts which are just bags of fat increase IQ?
OP, I can't believe you even mentioned that you read that larger breasts correlate to a higher IQ and you would seriously ask that Wilson fellow to validate it. That has to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard and no that has NOTHING to do with the size of what's on your chest but on the size of what's between your ears.
That has to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard of. How could large breasts which are just bags of fat increase IQ?
I'm sure the OP was addressing whether the same genetic codes that yield large breasts yield high intelligence. You know that peope study this stuff and while I am no expert on the subject, I can look at the shape of your hand and fingers and make a pretty good prediction of your intelligence. No kidding. Its called Cheirognomy.
I'm sure the OP was addressing whether the same genetic codes that yield large breasts yield high intelligence. You know that peope study this stuff and while I am no expert on the subject, I can look at the shape of your hand and fingers and make a pretty good prediction of your intelligence. No kidding. Its called Cheirognomy.
Interesting....Im assuming that isnt the same thing as palm reading is it?
Interesting....Im assuming that isnt the same thing as palm reading is it?
No, palm reading is called Chiromancy. The study of lines of the hand. I don't know anything about that. It looks like BS, but what do I know?
No doubt about Cheirognomy though. You could stick your hand through a hole in a wall and I could tell a lot about you. There are a lot of good books. Completely different than reading the lines on the palm.
Think for a moment about how much you can tell from looking at a person's face. We all go through life contorting our face to smiles or serious or sexy or whatever and so the genetic material causing the face to appear a certain way is somewhat distorted. Still, you can tell a lot about a person from their face. There is just as much if not more genetic determinates in the hand and, for the most part it remains unspoiled for evaluation because people don't try to portray their hands a certain way.
No, palm reading is called Chiromancy. The study of lines of the hand. I don't know anything about that. It looks like BS, but what do I know?
No doubt about Cheirognomy though. You could stick your hand through a hole in a wall and I could tell a lot about you. There are a lot of good books. Completely different than reading the lines on the palm.
Think for a moment about how much you can tell from looking at a person's face. We all go through life contorting our face to smiles or serious or sexy or whatever and so the genetic material causing the face to appear a certain way is somewhat distorted. Still, you can tell a lot about a person from their face. There is just as much if not more genetic determinates in the hand and, for the most part it remains unspoiled for evaluation because people don't try to portray their hands a certain way.
Oh ok..thanks for the clarification...learning a lot here.
I don't know what biology class you were in, but I'm pretty certain that women don't have breasts because men like them. Men like large breasts because it's a sign of fertility.,,,.
No, men see large boobs and we just want to jump them, no child rearing comes to mind.
Therefore, if porn and the media have presented a completely hairless look, it looks more like the dude onscreen is getting it on with a pre-pubescent girl than a fully grown women. More and more, men prefer the 'bikini wax' look.
What does that say about men's preferences? Shouldn't an abundant bush signal availability, too?
One benefit of the shaved look is seeing the action, porn in the 70's was like watching the Spike channel on cable.
My wife sported the full bush when we dated. We picked up where we dropped off ten years later and I find she now has shaved, she did it for herself.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But the first problem is you have no idea what a man is yet. They don't know it either. The guys you call men still play with toys.,,,.
