Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yeah, I think you're right. I was talkin' to another trainer here, about this conundrum, and he's in AA so he gets to listen to former drunk females tell stories about their drinking days all the time. He says they say that, yeah, liqour is alot tougher on the female bod than on guys, and wetting their panties is pretty common.
That--and wet farts too.
That's sorta gross.
Gee I'm glad I'm married to a tee-totaller and away from the party girl scene forever!
Thanks for oyur input; you're the only one who came up with a halfway intelligent answer!
1. Why wouldn't you pose this question in the Health Forum as opposed to the Fashion Forum?
2. Aren't you a recovering alcoholic yourself? You never heard "drunken females" discuss this at any meetings? FWIW, a party girl doesn't necessarily equate to an alcoholic (nor peeing in their panties) just as an alcoholic doesn't mean they're into partying.
3. I still don't see why someone would have to dispose of their panties because they accidentally peed in them. Washing machines are capable of a lot these days.
I still stand by my theory...they were screwin' with ya' and not in a way you'd like.
Last edited by TheImportersWife; 05-18-2011 at 02:34 PM..
1. Why wouldn't you pose this question in the Health Forum as opposed to the Fashion Forum?
2. Aren't you a recovering alcoholic yourself? You never heard "drunken females" discuss this at any meetings? FWIW, a party girl doesn't necessarily equate to an alcoholic (nor peeing in their panties) just as an alcoholic doesn't mean they're into partying.
3. I still don't see why someone would have to dispose of their panties because they accidentally peed in them. Washing machines are capable of a lot these days.
I still stand by my theory...they were screwin' with ya' and not in a way you'd like.
Your theory would merit some thought if these two young ladies had known I was overhearing them, or if they could have even seen me. But, as I was in my cubicle at the time, sitting down, on the computer, in our office, and they were outside the door and around a wall, in the foyer, I highly doubt they were even remotely aware of me being able to hear them. Sorry to squash your postulization.
And, uh, no..... there's no way I'd "like" them to be "screwin' with me, as you so eloquently put it, as I'm a happily married man!
But hey! Thanks for your interest. Again. It's good to see that you follow all my posts so closely. (obsessively?...)
Thanks for oyur input; you're the only one who came up with a halfway intelligent answer!
Well, around these forums if you use a capital letter and a period at the end of your sentence, then you automatically qualify for a highly intelligent answer, even if there is a bunch of $#@%^@%$!$#@!$ in between.
I have a theory, based on my um... "not so pure" younger days.
I do not like to put a pair back on after being umm... "excited by" and then "busy with" a young man and staying at least part of the night in his place... I might've thrown out a pair (or two ), and went home commando.
I have a theory, based on my um... "not so pure" younger days.
I do not like to put a pair back on after being umm... "excited by" and then "busy with" a young man and staying at least part of the night in his place... I might've thrown out a pair (or two ), and went home commando.
you seem like a fun chick.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.