Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Where do you get this stuff? First you have a thread about butt implants and now you ask about curves.
In any event,you do know you can be small and have large breasts,and vice versa.
I also have to tell you curves have nothing to do with large breasts or butt.
What matters most is the waist to hip ratio. Has to be 0.7 or less.
Doesn't matter if you are 110 pounds or 300 pounds,as long as you have the 0.7 ratio you are curvy.
A 51-38-44 isn't curvy at all,that's apple shaped.
A 34-30-46 is a pear,or coke bottle shape. Not considered hourglass,but may be considered curvy depending on who you ask.
In other words,curvy depends on the beholder.
Hips that big is obese! That is not curvy
I am 34 24 34... which I consider straight but at least its proportional.
So what do I do to get them down? Shave the bone?
They have always been over 45 inches ever since I was 12. Once I get down to my ideal weight my meausrements would look like 32b-26-42.(measurements pre weight gain) In other words,the more weight I lose the,the more disprortionate I become.
My ribcage(the underbust) is 30 inches.
I'm just not proportioned. Nothing I can do about that.
jersey that's way unhealthy and out of the norm. You're a .62 normally. But you contradicted yourself. You said you were always over 45 since 12 and that you were 42 pre-weight gain... If you were 45 with a 26 inch waist you are before weightgain very unhealthy if you were always over 46 inches... Being a .57 is very unhealthy on the charts at least.
I think curvy is more attractive, but it's harder to find clothing that fits and is flattering. Most fashion designers make clothes that only look good on coat hangers, not real women. For that reason I would rather be slim.
jersey that's way unhealthy and out of the norm. You're a .62 normally. But you contradicted yourself. You said you were always over 45 since 12 and that you were 42 pre-weight gain... If you were 45 with a 26 inch waist you are before weightgain very unhealthy if you were always over 46 inches... Being a .57 is very unhealthy on the charts at least.
Yes,I haven't worn a size 10 since.....5th grade? Your right,they would be 42,because they are always going to be 16 inches apart.
My mom always had to shop for womens sizes in jeans for me since I was 10.
You do know I'm saying most people with large hips bones won't lose fat there,
because that isn't fat making it big,its bone. I can feel the bones there now,and I'm 180. Any inches lost on me would be in my backside.,rather than the hips.
It would be pointless for me to have a goal of fitting in a size 10 jeans when I haven't done so in 20 years,before puberty.
Actually,that's not unhealthy to have that whr. It means you don't store fat around your vital organs.
Last edited by jerseygal4u; 08-25-2012 at 03:46 AM..
wow are you a guy or a girl? You started puberty around or after 5th grade.... That's kind of late for being a female js.
anyhow actually .7's are what's healthy not .6 or .5.
I didn't go through puberty until I was a senior in high school, at 17.
Some women don't ascribe to averages.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
