Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, she doesn't look her age. Sinead O'Connor looks her age. Cameron Diaz looks her age. Sandra Bullock looks her age. Kristin Davis, on the other hand, could legitimately pass for 33, 34. She definitely looks a good 15 years younger than she actually is.
Pfff please show me a 33 year old woman with crows feet, wrinkles as deep as Kristen then I will agree with you. A 33 year old woman doesn't have eyelids that sag like that. People get REAL!!!
Again she is very pretty but she doesn't look 33, not even 40. Check those pictures again, and also check her pictures in Wikipedia
People need to stop this fantasy that you can look 10 or 20 years younger than what you are. That is BS, even for celebrities. You can look good for your age but that is it. Kristen will probably be another Sally Field who will look great all the way to her mid sixties... For her age. Only a clueless person would think another one looks decades younger.
Everyone ages more or less the same but some families have genes that make them look attractive as they age. That and great plastic surgery, professional cosmetics, a life style that doesn't take a toll on their bodies, the time to take care of themselves, use of illegal drugs, a nanny, housekeeper, cook and a personal trainer.
Solely going on the pictures provided and what I have seen of these two in the media, I much prefer Richardson's comfortability in flaunting her body, but have always had a crush on Davis, so I picked her, though it was a tough decision.
Kristin Davis is just so pretty. Her bone structure has helped her age well but there are rumours that suggest she uses Botox. I imagine almost every single women in Hollywood does to some degree or another.
David does not look mid 30s. Interpreting 'gorgeous' as 'young' is inaccurate. She really does have a lot of age around the eyes. But so what? Still lovely.
I'm not a guy so my vote doesn't count but I picked Richardson even though I adore Kristen and think she is so lovely even if she has aged.
Wow, I was so shocked by the pic of Shine Head O'Conner though. She used to be so gorgeous even without hair. What the heck happened to her? Did she just let herself go?
And as for Sandra Bullock looking old, personally, I don't think so. She's obviously not 34 anymore but she is still a real beauty with a great figure. My husband's friend has a thing for her and I tease him about it, especially when she broke up with her biker man. What was his name? Hum, oops fame didn't remember his name. Too bad, so sad.
Kristin Davis is, and always has been, an incredible beauty. She floors the competition in the age 45 and over competition, everyone is battling for second place. (Makeup does take off 10 years)
2011, Africa:
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Genome Lottery
